A comparison of specs, key information, reviews, and best pricing from top retailers
Last updated -- hours ago | Report incorrect information
PG34WCDM
Company ProductName Specs




38WN95C
Company ProductName Specs




What we think

Chevron down
PerfectRec Logo
The PerfectRec monitor team Learn more
Updated April 11, 2024·

If you're heavily into competitive gaming and want the best performance with minimal ghosting, the Asus monitor with its high refresh rate and superior response time is an excellent choice, but keep in mind it falls short for productivity due to low text clarity and brightness. The LG monitor, on the other hand, offers good performance across the board for gaming, productivity, and media consumption with a larger screen and better image clarity at a slightly lower cost; however, it won't match the Asus for motion handling in fast-paced games. Neither are ideal for HDR content, but the Asus does provide a better HDR gaming experience. Give Feedback

this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the Asus PG34WCDM (W-OLED)
  • Best in class for casual gaming
  • Good for media consumption
  • Very good refresh rate
  • Best in class contrast
  • Best in class response time
Advantages of the LG 38WN95C (IPS)
  • Good text clarity
  • Good brightness

Key differences

Chevron down

Casual Gaming

9.5
PG34WCDM
38WN95C
6.1
3440 x 1440
RESOLUTION
3840 x 1600
240Hz
REFRESH RATE
144Hz
Inf:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
898:1
238 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
477 nits
716 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
692 nits
96.6 %
DCI-P3 COLOR GAMUT
94.1 %
Matte
COATING
Matte
The Asus PG34WCDM (W-OLED) is best in class for casual gaming, while the LG 38WN95C (IPS) is only fair.

Competitive Gaming

5.6
PG34WCDM
38WN95C
4.5
240Hz
REFRESH RATE
144Hz
1.1 ms
TOTAL RESPONSE TIME
7.1 ms
20 - 240 Hz
VARIABLE REFRESH RATE
20 - 144 Hz
Yes
STROBING / BFI
No
238 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
477 nits
The Asus PG34WCDM (W-OLED) and LG 38WN95C (IPS) are both poor for competitive gaming, though the Asus PG34WCDM (W-OLED) is somewhat better.

Productivity

5.7
PG34WCDM
38WN95C
6.6
3440 x 1440
RESOLUTION
3840 x 1600
109 PPI
PIXELS PER INCH
111 PPI
Yes
ADJUSTABLE STAND
Yes
Matte
COATING
Matte
The LG 38WN95C (IPS) is only fair for productivity, while the Asus PG34WCDM (W-OLED) is poor.

Media Consumption

7.5
PG34WCDM
38WN95C
6.2
3440 x 1440
RESOLUTION
3840 x 1600
Inf:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
898:1
238 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
477 nits
716 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
692 nits
Matte
COATING
Matte
The Asus PG34WCDM (W-OLED) is good for media consumption, while the LG 38WN95C (IPS) is only fair.

Cost

$1,300
PG34WCDM
38WN95C
$1,200
Product image
Product image

$600

$800

$1,000

$1,200

$1,400

$1,600

$1,800

$2,000

The Asus PG34WCDM (W-OLED) has a price of $1,300 and the LG 38WN95C (IPS) costs $1,200.

HDR Gaming and Media Consumption

Yes
PG34WCDM
38WN95C
No
The Asus PG34WCDM (W-OLED) is suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption while the LG 38WN95C (IPS) is not suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption.

Key similarities

Chevron down

Digital Photo Editing

Yes
PG34WCDM
38WN95C
Yes
Both the Asus PG34WCDM (W-OLED) and LG 38WN95C (IPS) are suitable for digital photo editing.

HDR Video Editing and Color Grading

No
PG34WCDM
38WN95C
No
Both the Asus PG34WCDM (W-OLED) and LG 38WN95C (IPS) are not suitable for HDR video editing and color grading.

Print Photo Editing

No
PG34WCDM
38WN95C
No
Both the Asus PG34WCDM (W-OLED) and LG 38WN95C (IPS) are not suitable for print photo editing.

Give feedback

We’re constantly working to improve.

How the Asus PG34WCDM (W-OLED) and the LG 38WN95C (IPS) compare to other monitors

Chevron down

Spec Comparison

Chevron down
Asus PG34WCDM (W-OLED)LG 38WN95C (IPS)
Asus PG34WCDM (W-OLED)LG 38WN95C (IPS)

GENERAL

Price
$1,300
$1,200
Screen Size
34"38"
Resolution
3440 x 14403840 x 1600
Screen Type
OLEDLED
Screen Sub-type
W-OLEDIPS
Local Dimming Zones
N/A4

COLOR, CONTRAST & BRIGHTNESS

Native Contrast
Inf:1898:1
SDR Peak Brightness
238 nits477 nits
HDR Peak Brightness
716 nits692 nits
Suitable for HDR Gaming and Media Consumption
YesNo
sRGB Color Gamut
100 %100 %

MOTION CHARACTERISTICS

Total Response Time
1.1 ms7.1 ms
Variable Refresh Rate
20 - 240 Hz20 - 144 Hz
Strobing / BFI
YesNo
Persistence Blur Score
8/106.6/10
Ghosting Score
9.6/107.9/10

TEXT & IMAGE CLARITY

Pixels Per Inch
109 PPI111 PPI
Coating
MatteMatte
Text Clarity Score
6.6/107.2/10
Image Clarity Score
7/107.2/10

PORTS & CONNECTIVITY

HDMI 1.4 Ports
00
HDMI 2.0 Ports
02
HDMI 2.1 Ports
20
Micro HDMI Ports
00
DisplayPort 1.2 Ports
00

Give feedback

We're constantly perfecting our model

FAQs

Chevron down

Why trust us

Chevron down
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec monitors team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest monitor information and makes it digestible for you.

By the numbers

210
Monitors evaluated
10,500
Monitors stats compiled
15
Proprietary Monitors ratings developed
97,400
Recommendations made
14,610
Consumer hours saved

About the monitor team

Joe Golden, Ph.D

CEO and Monitors Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.

Jason Lew

Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.

Chandradeep Chowdhury

Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.

Featured in

Color LTT LogoGeekwire logo9to5 Mac logoPhone Arena LogoColor Daring Fireball logo