A comparison of specs, key information, reviews, and best pricing from top retailers
Last updated -- hours ago | Report incorrect information
PG34WCDM
Company ProductName Specs




34WQ73A
Company ProductName Specs




What we think

Chevron down
PerfectRec Logo
The PerfectRec monitor team Learn more
Updated April 11, 2024·

If you're a competitive gamer or someone who enjoys HDR gaming and watching high-dynamic-range content, the ASUS PG34WCDM with its superior contrast and color performance could be an excellent choice, despite its higher price. However, if you're focused on productivity or print photo editing and you're budget-conscious, the LG 34WQ73A with its adequate color accuracy, larger array of USB ports, and lower price could serve your needs well, though it won't match the ASUS's gaming or HDR capabilities. Keep in mind the ASUS also offers a wider variable refresh rate range and better response time, which reduces motion blur for a smoother gaming experience. Give Feedback

this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the Asus PG34WCDM (W-OLED)
  • Best in class for casual gaming
  • Good for media consumption
  • Very good refresh rate
  • Best in class contrast
  • Best in class response time
Advantages of the LG 34WQ73A (IPS)
  • Good text clarity

Key differences

Chevron down

Casual Gaming

9.5
PG34WCDM
34WQ73A
5.8
3440 x 1440
RESOLUTION
3440 x 1440
240Hz
REFRESH RATE
60Hz
Inf:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
1000:1
238 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
300 nits
716 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
Unknown
96.6 %
DCI-P3 COLOR GAMUT
Unknown
Matte
COATING
Matte
The Asus PG34WCDM (W-OLED) is best in class for casual gaming, while the LG 34WQ73A (IPS) is poor.

Competitive Gaming

5.6
PG34WCDM
34WQ73A
3.8
240Hz
REFRESH RATE
60Hz
1.1 ms
TOTAL RESPONSE TIME
10.0 ms
20 - 240 Hz
VARIABLE REFRESH RATE
N/A
Yes
STROBING / BFI
No
238 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
300 nits
The Asus PG34WCDM (W-OLED) and LG 34WQ73A (IPS) are both poor for competitive gaming, though the Asus PG34WCDM (W-OLED) is somewhat better.

Media Consumption

7.5
PG34WCDM
34WQ73A
5.9
3440 x 1440
RESOLUTION
3440 x 1440
Inf:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
1000:1
238 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
300 nits
716 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
Unknown
Matte
COATING
Matte
The Asus PG34WCDM (W-OLED) is good for media consumption, while the LG 34WQ73A (IPS) is poor.

Cost

$1,300
PG34WCDM
34WQ73A
$400
Product image
Product image

$0

$500

$1,000

$1,500

$2,000

The Asus PG34WCDM (W-OLED) has a price of $1,300 and the LG 34WQ73A (IPS) costs $400.

HDR Gaming and Media Consumption

Yes
PG34WCDM
34WQ73A
No
The Asus PG34WCDM (W-OLED) is suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption while the LG 34WQ73A (IPS) is not suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption.

Digital Photo Editing

Yes
PG34WCDM
34WQ73A
No
The Asus PG34WCDM (W-OLED) is suitable for digital photo editing while the LG 34WQ73A (IPS) is not suitable for digital photo editing.

Print Photo Editing

No
PG34WCDM
34WQ73A
Yes
The Asus PG34WCDM (W-OLED) is not suitable for print photo editing while the LG 34WQ73A (IPS) is suitable for print photo editing.

Key similarities

Chevron down

Productivity

5.7
PG34WCDM
34WQ73A
6.0
3440 x 1440
RESOLUTION
3440 x 1440
109 PPI
PIXELS PER INCH
110 PPI
Yes
ADJUSTABLE STAND
Yes
Matte
COATING
Matte
Although they have very similar scores, PerfectRec considers LG 34WQ73A (IPS) to be only fair for productivity, while the Asus PG34WCDM (W-OLED) is poor.

HDR Video Editing and Color Grading

No
PG34WCDM
34WQ73A
No
Both the Asus PG34WCDM (W-OLED) and LG 34WQ73A (IPS) are not suitable for HDR video editing and color grading.

Give feedback

We’re constantly working to improve.

How the Asus PG34WCDM (W-OLED) and the LG 34WQ73A (IPS) compare to other monitors

Chevron down

Spec Comparison

Chevron down
Asus PG34WCDM (W-OLED)LG 34WQ73A (IPS)
Asus PG34WCDM (W-OLED)LG 34WQ73A (IPS)

GENERAL

Price
$1,300
$400
Screen Size
34"34"
Resolution
3440 x 14403440 x 1440
Screen Type
OLEDLED
Screen Sub-type
W-OLEDIPS
Refresh Rate
240Hz60Hz

COLOR, CONTRAST & BRIGHTNESS

Native Contrast
Inf:11000:1
SDR Peak Brightness
238 nits300 nits
HDR Peak Brightness
716 nitsUnknown
Suitable for HDR Gaming and Media Consumption
YesNo
sRGB Color Gamut
100 %99 %

MOTION CHARACTERISTICS

Total Response Time
1.1 ms10 ms
Variable Refresh Rate
20 - 240 HzN/A
Strobing / BFI
YesNo
Persistence Blur Score
8/105/10
Ghosting Score
9.6/107.1/10

TEXT & IMAGE CLARITY

Pixels Per Inch
109 PPI110 PPI
Coating
MatteMatte
Text Clarity Score
6.6/107.1/10
Image Clarity Score
7/107.1/10

PORTS & CONNECTIVITY

HDMI 1.4 Ports
00
HDMI 2.0 Ports
02
HDMI 2.1 Ports
20
Micro HDMI Ports
00
DisplayPort 1.2 Ports
00

Give feedback

We're constantly perfecting our model

FAQs

Chevron down

Why trust us

Chevron down
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec monitors team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest monitor information and makes it digestible for you.

By the numbers

210
Monitors evaluated
10,500
Monitors stats compiled
15
Proprietary Monitors ratings developed
107,900
Recommendations made
16,185
Consumer hours saved

About the monitor team

Joe Golden, Ph.D

CEO and Monitors Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.

Jason Lew

Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.

Chandradeep Chowdhury

Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.

Featured in

Color LTT LogoGeekwire logo9to5 Mac logoPhone Arena LogoColor Daring Fireball logo