If you're a competitive gamer looking for the fastest refresh rates and minimal ghosting, the Asus PG27AQN would be a superior choice, despite its higher cost. However, for those who prioritize higher resolution for productivity or media consumption, the Asus VG28UQL1A, with its larger screen and higher pixel density, would serve better, also offering good performance for casual gaming. The VG28UQL1A might not match the PG27AQN in response times or refresh rates, making it less ideal for competitive gaming, but it does offer better suitability for digital photo and print editing due to its broader color gamut coverage. Give Feedback
this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the Asus PG27AQN (IPS)
Best in class for competitive gaming
Best in class refresh rate
Good brightness
Advantages of the Asus VG28UQL1A (IPS)
Good for casual gaming
Very good for productivity
Good for media consumption
Best in class response time
Key differences
Competitive Gaming
9.5/10
6.1/10
360Hz
REFRESH RATE
144Hz
5.6 ms
TOTAL RESPONSE TIME
1.0 ms
20 - 360 Hz
VARIABLE REFRESH RATE
48 - 144 Hz
Yes
STROBING / BFI
No
414 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
350 nits
The Asus PG27AQN (IPS) is best in class for competitive gaming, while the Asus VG28UQL1A (IPS) is only fair.
Productivity
6.5/10
8.8/10
2560 x 1440
RESOLUTION
3840 x 2160
109 PPI
PIXELS PER INCH
157 PPI
Yes
ADJUSTABLE STAND
Yes
Semi-Gloss
COATING
Matte
The Asus VG28UQL1A (IPS) is very good for productivity, while the Asus PG27AQN (IPS) is only fair.
Media Consumption
6.0/10
7.0/10
2560 x 1440
RESOLUTION
3840 x 2160
974:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
1000:1
414 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
350 nits
644 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
350 nits
Semi-Gloss
COATING
Matte
The Asus VG28UQL1A (IPS) is good for media consumption, while the Asus PG27AQN (IPS) is only fair.
Cost
$949
$611
$200
$400
$600
$800
$1,000
$1,200
$1,400
The Asus PG27AQN (IPS) has a price of $949 and the Asus VG28UQL1A (IPS) costs $611.
Print Photo Editing
No
Yes
The Asus PG27AQN (IPS) is not suitable for print photo editing while the Asus VG28UQL1A (IPS) is suitable for print photo editing.
Key similarities
Casual Gaming
6.7/10
7.2/10
2560 x 1440
RESOLUTION
3840 x 2160
360Hz
REFRESH RATE
144Hz
974:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
1000:1
414 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
350 nits
644 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
350 nits
92.0 %
DCI-P3 COLOR GAMUT
90.0 %
Semi-Gloss
COATING
Matte
Although they have very similar scores, PerfectRec considers Asus VG28UQL1A (IPS) to be good for casual gaming, while the Asus PG27AQN (IPS) is only fair.
HDR Gaming and Media Consumption
No
No
Both the Asus PG27AQN (IPS) and Asus VG28UQL1A (IPS) are not suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption.
Digital Photo Editing
No
No
Both the Asus PG27AQN (IPS) and Asus VG28UQL1A (IPS) are not suitable for digital photo editing.
HDR Video Editing and Color Grading
No
No
Both the Asus PG27AQN (IPS) and Asus VG28UQL1A (IPS) are not suitable for HDR video editing and color grading.
Give feedback
We’re constantly working to improve.
How the Asus PG27AQN (IPS) and the Asus VG28UQL1A (IPS) compare to other monitors
"The Asus ROG Swift PG27AQN is a motion clarity marvel. It’s the first 27-inch 1440p 360Hz monitor on the market, and also the first to use an Ultrafast IPS display. These advancements provide outstanding motion clarity across a broad range of refresh rates. Unfortunately, the monitor’s motion clarity does nothing for its image quality, which is just ok. To be clear, it’s a very nice looking monitor in many situations. However, the monitor’s contrast ratio is rather low. And while it can reach high levels of brightness in HDR, it lacks the nuance and contrast required to look great in HDR games."
"The Asus TUF Gaming VG28UQL1A is, in many ways, a great 4K gaming monitor. It has a sharp, accurate image with good contrast and excellent motion clarity. Luminance uniformity is its only weakness. The monitor’s $799 MSRP is relatively affordable for a 4K HDMI 2.1 monitor, as well."
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec monitors team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest monitor information and makes it digestible for you.
By the numbers
210
Monitors evaluated
10,500
Monitors stats compiled
15
Proprietary Monitors ratings developed
117,500
Recommendations made
17,625
Consumer hours saved
About the monitor team
Joe Golden, Ph.D
CEO and Monitors Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.
Jason Lew
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.
Chandradeep Chowdhury
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.