If you prioritize high-resolution work for tasks like digital photo editing, the Asus PA329CV with its larger screen resolution will serve you well for productivity and precision work, while saving you money. However, if you're more interested in a fluid and responsive gaming experience, the LG 32GQ850, despite its higher cost, excels with better refresh rates and gaming features. It falls short in media consumption due to its lower screen resolution compared to the Asus but offers an immersive gaming experience due to its high refresh rate and gaming-oriented features. Give Feedback
this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the Asus PA329CV (IPS)
Good for productivity
Good text clarity
Good image clarity
Advantages of the LG 32GQ850 (IPS)
Very good refresh rate
Good response time
Key differences
Competitive Gaming
3.8/10
5.2/10
60Hz
REFRESH RATE
260Hz
15.0 ms
TOTAL RESPONSE TIME
8.0 ms
N/A
VARIABLE REFRESH RATE
48 - 260 Hz
No
STROBING / BFI
No
350 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
150 nits
The LG 32GQ850 (IPS) and Asus PA329CV (IPS) are both poor for competitive gaming, though the LG 32GQ850 (IPS) is somewhat better.
Productivity
7.7/10
5.0/10
3840 x 2160
RESOLUTION
2560 x 1440
137 PPI
PIXELS PER INCH
93 PPI
Yes
ADJUSTABLE STAND
Yes
Matte
COATING
Matte
The Asus PA329CV (IPS) is good for productivity, while the LG 32GQ850 (IPS) is poor.
Media Consumption
6.5/10
5.3/10
3840 x 2160
RESOLUTION
2560 x 1440
1000:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
1000:1
350 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
150 nits
Unknown
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
600 nits
Matte
COATING
Matte
The Asus PA329CV (IPS) is only fair for media consumption, while the LG 32GQ850 (IPS) is poor.
Cost
$529
$718
$200
$400
$600
$800
$1,000
$1,200
The Asus PA329CV (IPS) has a price of $529 and the LG 32GQ850 (IPS) costs $718.
Print Photo Editing
No
Yes
The Asus PA329CV (IPS) is not suitable for print photo editing while the LG 32GQ850 (IPS) is suitable for print photo editing.
Key similarities
Casual Gaming
5.8/10
5.8/10
3840 x 2160
RESOLUTION
2560 x 1440
60Hz
REFRESH RATE
260Hz
1000:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
1000:1
350 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
150 nits
Unknown
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
600 nits
80.0 %
DCI-P3 COLOR GAMUT
98.0 %
Matte
COATING
Matte
The Asus PA329CV (IPS) and LG 32GQ850 (IPS) are both poor for casual gaming.
HDR Gaming and Media Consumption
No
No
Both the Asus PA329CV (IPS) and LG 32GQ850 (IPS) are not suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption.
Digital Photo Editing
Yes
Yes
Both the Asus PA329CV (IPS) and LG 32GQ850 (IPS) are suitable for digital photo editing.
HDR Video Editing and Color Grading
No
No
Both the Asus PA329CV (IPS) and LG 32GQ850 (IPS) are not suitable for HDR video editing and color grading.
Give feedback
We’re constantly working to improve.
How the Asus PA329CV (IPS) and the LG 32GQ850 (IPS) compare to other monitors
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec monitors team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest monitor information and makes it digestible for you.
By the numbers
210
Monitors evaluated
10,500
Monitors stats compiled
15
Proprietary Monitors ratings developed
117,200
Recommendations made
17,580
Consumer hours saved
About the monitor team
Joe Golden, Ph.D
CEO and Monitors Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.
Jason Lew
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.
Chandradeep Chowdhury
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.