A comparison of specs, key information, reviews, and best pricing from top retailers
Last updated -- hours ago | Report incorrect information
PA329CV
Company ProductName Specs




32GQ850
Company ProductName Specs




What we think

Chevron down
PerfectRec Logo
The PerfectRec monitor team Learn more
Updated April 11, 2024·

If you prioritize high-resolution work for tasks like digital photo editing, the Asus PA329CV with its larger screen resolution will serve you well for productivity and precision work, while saving you money. However, if you're more interested in a fluid and responsive gaming experience, the LG 32GQ850, despite its higher cost, excels with better refresh rates and gaming features. It falls short in media consumption due to its lower screen resolution compared to the Asus but offers an immersive gaming experience due to its high refresh rate and gaming-oriented features. Give Feedback

this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the Asus PA329CV (IPS)
  • Good for productivity
  • Good text clarity
  • Good image clarity
Advantages of the LG 32GQ850 (IPS)
  • Very good refresh rate
  • Good response time

Key differences

Chevron down

Competitive Gaming

3.8
PA329CV
32GQ850
5.2
60Hz
REFRESH RATE
260Hz
15.0 ms
TOTAL RESPONSE TIME
8.0 ms
N/A
VARIABLE REFRESH RATE
48 - 260 Hz
No
STROBING / BFI
No
350 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
150 nits
The LG 32GQ850 (IPS) and Asus PA329CV (IPS) are both poor for competitive gaming, though the LG 32GQ850 (IPS) is somewhat better.

Productivity

7.7
PA329CV
32GQ850
5.0
3840 x 2160
RESOLUTION
2560 x 1440
137 PPI
PIXELS PER INCH
93 PPI
Yes
ADJUSTABLE STAND
Yes
Matte
COATING
Matte
The Asus PA329CV (IPS) is good for productivity, while the LG 32GQ850 (IPS) is poor.

Media Consumption

6.5
PA329CV
32GQ850
5.3
3840 x 2160
RESOLUTION
2560 x 1440
1000:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
1000:1
350 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
150 nits
Unknown
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
600 nits
Matte
COATING
Matte
The Asus PA329CV (IPS) is only fair for media consumption, while the LG 32GQ850 (IPS) is poor.

Cost

$529
PA329CV
32GQ850
$718
Product image
Product image

$200

$400

$600

$800

$1,000

$1,200

The Asus PA329CV (IPS) has a price of $529 and the LG 32GQ850 (IPS) costs $718.

Print Photo Editing

No
PA329CV
32GQ850
Yes
The Asus PA329CV (IPS) is not suitable for print photo editing while the LG 32GQ850 (IPS) is suitable for print photo editing.

Key similarities

Chevron down

Casual Gaming

5.8
PA329CV
32GQ850
5.8
3840 x 2160
RESOLUTION
2560 x 1440
60Hz
REFRESH RATE
260Hz
1000:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
1000:1
350 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
150 nits
Unknown
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
600 nits
80.0 %
DCI-P3 COLOR GAMUT
98.0 %
Matte
COATING
Matte
The Asus PA329CV (IPS) and LG 32GQ850 (IPS) are both poor for casual gaming.

HDR Gaming and Media Consumption

No
PA329CV
32GQ850
No
Both the Asus PA329CV (IPS) and LG 32GQ850 (IPS) are not suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption.

Digital Photo Editing

Yes
PA329CV
32GQ850
Yes
Both the Asus PA329CV (IPS) and LG 32GQ850 (IPS) are suitable for digital photo editing.

HDR Video Editing and Color Grading

No
PA329CV
32GQ850
No
Both the Asus PA329CV (IPS) and LG 32GQ850 (IPS) are not suitable for HDR video editing and color grading.

Give feedback

We’re constantly working to improve.

How the Asus PA329CV (IPS) and the LG 32GQ850 (IPS) compare to other monitors

Chevron down

Spec Comparison

Chevron down
Asus PA329CV (IPS)LG 32GQ850 (IPS)
Asus PA329CV (IPS)LG 32GQ850 (IPS)

GENERAL

Price
$529
$718
Screen Size
32"32"
Resolution
3840 x 21602560 x 1440
Screen Type
LEDLED
Screen Sub-type
IPSIPS
Local Dimming Zones
N/A16

COLOR, CONTRAST & BRIGHTNESS

Native Contrast
1000:11000:1
SDR Peak Brightness
350 nits150 nits
HDR Peak Brightness
Unknown600 nits
Suitable for HDR Gaming and Media Consumption
NoNo
sRGB Color Gamut
99.6 %135 %

MOTION CHARACTERISTICS

Total Response Time
15 ms8 ms
Variable Refresh Rate
N/A48 - 260 Hz
Strobing / BFI
NoNo
Persistence Blur Score
5/108.3/10
Ghosting Score
6/107.6/10

TEXT & IMAGE CLARITY

Pixels Per Inch
137 PPI93 PPI
Coating
MatteMatte
Text Clarity Score
7.9/106.3/10
Image Clarity Score
7.9/106.3/10

PORTS & CONNECTIVITY

HDMI 1.4 Ports
00
HDMI 2.0 Ports
20
HDMI 2.1 Ports
01
Micro HDMI Ports
00
DisplayPort 1.2 Ports
10

Give feedback

We're constantly perfecting our model

FAQs

Chevron down

Why trust us

Chevron down
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec monitors team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest monitor information and makes it digestible for you.

By the numbers

210
Monitors evaluated
10,500
Monitors stats compiled
15
Proprietary Monitors ratings developed
117,200
Recommendations made
17,580
Consumer hours saved

About the monitor team

Joe Golden, Ph.D

CEO and Monitors Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.

Jason Lew

Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.

Chandradeep Chowdhury

Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.

Featured in

Color LTT LogoGeekwire logo9to5 Mac logoPhone Arena LogoColor Daring Fireball logo