A comparison of specs, key information, reviews, and best pricing from top retailers
Last updated -- hours ago | Report incorrect information
PA329CV
Company ProductName Specs




32GP850
Company ProductName Specs




What we think

Chevron down
PerfectRec Logo
The PerfectRec monitor team Learn more
Updated April 11, 2024·

If your priority is crisp text and image clarity for productivity and digital photo editing, the Asus PA329CV with its higher resolution would serve you well, although it's at a higher price point. However, if you prefer a monitor that's better suited for casual to competitive gaming, with quicker response times and variable refresh rate to reduce screen tearing, the LG 32GP850 is the more cost-effective option, though it has a lower resolution which is not ideal for tasks requiring the highest image detail. Neither monitor is optimal for HDR gaming or HDR video editing, so if these are crucial for you, you might want to consider other options. Give Feedback

this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the Asus PA329CV (IPS)
  • Good for productivity
  • Good text clarity
  • Good image clarity
Advantages of the LG 32GP850 (IPS)
  • Good refresh rate
  • Good brightness
  • Very good response time

Key differences

Chevron down

Competitive Gaming

3.8
PA329CV
32GP850
4.8
60Hz
REFRESH RATE
180Hz
15.0 ms
TOTAL RESPONSE TIME
6.2 ms
N/A
VARIABLE REFRESH RATE
20 - 180 Hz
No
STROBING / BFI
Yes
350 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
412 nits
The LG 32GP850 (IPS) and Asus PA329CV (IPS) are both poor for competitive gaming, though the LG 32GP850 (IPS) is somewhat better.

Productivity

7.7
PA329CV
32GP850
5.0
3840 x 2160
RESOLUTION
2560 x 1440
137 PPI
PIXELS PER INCH
93 PPI
Yes
ADJUSTABLE STAND
Yes
Matte
COATING
Matte
The Asus PA329CV (IPS) is good for productivity, while the LG 32GP850 (IPS) is poor.

Media Consumption

6.5
PA329CV
32GP850
5.5
3840 x 2160
RESOLUTION
2560 x 1440
1000:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
1037:1
350 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
412 nits
Unknown
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
430 nits
Matte
COATING
Matte
The Asus PA329CV (IPS) is only fair for media consumption, while the LG 32GP850 (IPS) is poor.

Cost

$529
PA329CV
32GP850
$600
Product image
Product image

$200

$300

$400

$500

$600

$700

$800

$900

The Asus PA329CV (IPS) has a price of $529 and the LG 32GP850 (IPS) costs $600.

Key similarities

Chevron down

Casual Gaming

5.8
PA329CV
32GP850
5.8
3840 x 2160
RESOLUTION
2560 x 1440
60Hz
REFRESH RATE
180Hz
1000:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
1037:1
350 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
412 nits
Unknown
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
430 nits
80.0 %
DCI-P3 COLOR GAMUT
95.5 %
Matte
COATING
Matte
The LG 32GP850 (IPS) and Asus PA329CV (IPS) are both poor for casual gaming.

HDR Gaming and Media Consumption

No
PA329CV
32GP850
No
Both the Asus PA329CV (IPS) and LG 32GP850 (IPS) are not suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption.

Digital Photo Editing

Yes
PA329CV
32GP850
Yes
Both the Asus PA329CV (IPS) and LG 32GP850 (IPS) are suitable for digital photo editing.

HDR Video Editing and Color Grading

No
PA329CV
32GP850
No
Both the Asus PA329CV (IPS) and LG 32GP850 (IPS) are not suitable for HDR video editing and color grading.

Print Photo Editing

No
PA329CV
32GP850
No
Both the Asus PA329CV (IPS) and LG 32GP850 (IPS) are not suitable for print photo editing.

Give feedback

We’re constantly working to improve.

How the Asus PA329CV (IPS) and the LG 32GP850 (IPS) compare to other monitors

Chevron down

Spec Comparison

Chevron down
Asus PA329CV (IPS)LG 32GP850 (IPS)
Asus PA329CV (IPS)LG 32GP850 (IPS)

GENERAL

Price
$529
$600
Screen Size
32"32"
Resolution
3840 x 21602560 x 1440
Screen Type
LEDLED
Screen Sub-type
IPSIPS
Refresh Rate
60Hz180Hz

COLOR, CONTRAST & BRIGHTNESS

Native Contrast
1000:11037:1
SDR Peak Brightness
350 nits412 nits
HDR Peak Brightness
Unknown430 nits
Suitable for HDR Gaming and Media Consumption
NoNo
sRGB Color Gamut
99.6 %100 %

MOTION CHARACTERISTICS

Total Response Time
15 ms6.2 ms
Variable Refresh Rate
N/A20 - 180 Hz
Strobing / BFI
NoYes
Persistence Blur Score
5/107.3/10
Ghosting Score
6/108/10

TEXT & IMAGE CLARITY

Pixels Per Inch
137 PPI93 PPI
Coating
MatteMatte
Text Clarity Score
7.9/106.3/10
Image Clarity Score
7.9/106.3/10

PORTS & CONNECTIVITY

HDMI 1.4 Ports
01
HDMI 2.0 Ports
22
HDMI 2.1 Ports
00
Micro HDMI Ports
00
DisplayPort 1.2 Ports
10

Give feedback

We're constantly perfecting our model

FAQs

Chevron down

Why trust us

Chevron down
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec monitors team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest monitor information and makes it digestible for you.

By the numbers

210
Monitors evaluated
10,500
Monitors stats compiled
15
Proprietary Monitors ratings developed
107,900
Recommendations made
16,185
Consumer hours saved

About the monitor team

Joe Golden, Ph.D

CEO and Monitors Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.

Jason Lew

Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.

Chandradeep Chowdhury

Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.

Featured in

Color LTT LogoGeekwire logo9to5 Mac logoPhone Arena LogoColor Daring Fireball logo