If your priority is crisp text and image clarity for productivity and digital photo editing, the Asus PA329CV with its higher resolution would serve you well, although it's at a higher price point. However, if you prefer a monitor that's better suited for casual to competitive gaming, with quicker response times and variable refresh rate to reduce screen tearing, the LG 32GP850 is the more cost-effective option, though it has a lower resolution which is not ideal for tasks requiring the highest image detail. Neither monitor is optimal for HDR gaming or HDR video editing, so if these are crucial for you, you might want to consider other options. Give Feedback
this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the Asus PA329CV (IPS)
Good for productivity
Good text clarity
Good image clarity
Advantages of the LG 32GP850 (IPS)
Good refresh rate
Good brightness
Very good response time
Key differences
Competitive Gaming
3.8/10
4.8/10
60Hz
REFRESH RATE
180Hz
15.0 ms
TOTAL RESPONSE TIME
6.2 ms
N/A
VARIABLE REFRESH RATE
20 - 180 Hz
No
STROBING / BFI
Yes
350 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
412 nits
The LG 32GP850 (IPS) and Asus PA329CV (IPS) are both poor for competitive gaming, though the LG 32GP850 (IPS) is somewhat better.
Productivity
7.7/10
5.0/10
3840 x 2160
RESOLUTION
2560 x 1440
137 PPI
PIXELS PER INCH
93 PPI
Yes
ADJUSTABLE STAND
Yes
Matte
COATING
Matte
The Asus PA329CV (IPS) is good for productivity, while the LG 32GP850 (IPS) is poor.
Media Consumption
6.5/10
5.5/10
3840 x 2160
RESOLUTION
2560 x 1440
1000:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
1037:1
350 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
412 nits
Unknown
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
430 nits
Matte
COATING
Matte
The Asus PA329CV (IPS) is only fair for media consumption, while the LG 32GP850 (IPS) is poor.
Cost
$529
$600
$200
$300
$400
$500
$600
$700
$800
$900
The Asus PA329CV (IPS) has a price of $529 and the LG 32GP850 (IPS) costs $600.
Key similarities
Casual Gaming
5.8/10
5.8/10
3840 x 2160
RESOLUTION
2560 x 1440
60Hz
REFRESH RATE
180Hz
1000:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
1037:1
350 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
412 nits
Unknown
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
430 nits
80.0 %
DCI-P3 COLOR GAMUT
95.5 %
Matte
COATING
Matte
The LG 32GP850 (IPS) and Asus PA329CV (IPS) are both poor for casual gaming.
HDR Gaming and Media Consumption
No
No
Both the Asus PA329CV (IPS) and LG 32GP850 (IPS) are not suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption.
Digital Photo Editing
Yes
Yes
Both the Asus PA329CV (IPS) and LG 32GP850 (IPS) are suitable for digital photo editing.
HDR Video Editing and Color Grading
No
No
Both the Asus PA329CV (IPS) and LG 32GP850 (IPS) are not suitable for HDR video editing and color grading.
Print Photo Editing
No
No
Both the Asus PA329CV (IPS) and LG 32GP850 (IPS) are not suitable for print photo editing.
Give feedback
We’re constantly working to improve.
How the Asus PA329CV (IPS) and the LG 32GP850 (IPS) compare to other monitors
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec monitors team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest monitor information and makes it digestible for you.
By the numbers
210
Monitors evaluated
10,500
Monitors stats compiled
15
Proprietary Monitors ratings developed
117,200
Recommendations made
17,580
Consumer hours saved
About the monitor team
Joe Golden, Ph.D
CEO and Monitors Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.
Jason Lew
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.
Chandradeep Chowdhury
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.