A comparison of specs, key information, reviews, and best pricing from top retailers
Last updated -- hours ago | Report incorrect information
PA329CV
Company ProductName Specs




G24F-2
Company ProductName Specs




What we think

Chevron down
PerfectRec Logo
The PerfectRec monitor team Learn more
Updated April 11, 2024·

If your priority is high-resolution digital photo editing with decent color accuracy, the Asus PA329CV might be more suitable due to its larger screen size and better color coverage for certain color spaces, which can be important for tasks like photo editing. However, the Gigabyte G24F-2 is a more budget-friendly option that still offers good color accuracy and could be better suited for competitive gaming due to its higher refresh rate and quick response time. Keep in mind though, the smaller size and lower resolution of the Gigabyte may not be ideal for productivity tasks that benefit from a larger workspace and sharper text clarity. If high dynamic range (HDR) content is a significant part of your use, neither of these monitors is particularly well-suited for HDR gaming or video editing. Give Feedback

this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the Asus PA329CV (IPS)
  • Good for productivity
  • Good text clarity
  • Good image clarity
Advantages of the Gigabyte G24F-2 (IPS)
  • Good refresh rate
  • Good response time

Key differences

Chevron down

Competitive Gaming

3.8
PA329CV
G24F-2
5.8
60Hz
REFRESH RATE
170Hz
15.0 ms
TOTAL RESPONSE TIME
8.0 ms
N/A
VARIABLE REFRESH RATE
48 - 180 Hz
No
STROBING / BFI
No
350 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
300 nits
The Gigabyte G24F-2 (IPS) and Asus PA329CV (IPS) are both poor for competitive gaming, though the Gigabyte G24F-2 (IPS) is somewhat better.

Productivity

7.7
PA329CV
G24F-2
4.9
3840 x 2160
RESOLUTION
1920 x 1080
137 PPI
PIXELS PER INCH
92 PPI
Yes
ADJUSTABLE STAND
Yes
Matte
COATING
Matte
The Asus PA329CV (IPS) is good for productivity, while the Gigabyte G24F-2 (IPS) is poor.

Media Consumption

6.5
PA329CV
G24F-2
5.4
3840 x 2160
RESOLUTION
1920 x 1080
1000:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
1100:1
350 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
300 nits
Unknown
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
Unknown
Matte
COATING
Matte
The Asus PA329CV (IPS) is only fair for media consumption, while the Gigabyte G24F-2 (IPS) is poor.

Cost

$529
PA329CV
G24F-2
$140
Product image
Product image

$0

$200

$400

$600

$800

The Asus PA329CV (IPS) has a price of $529 and the Gigabyte G24F-2 (IPS) costs $140.

Print Photo Editing

No
PA329CV
G24F-2
Yes
The Asus PA329CV (IPS) is not suitable for print photo editing while the Gigabyte G24F-2 (IPS) is suitable for print photo editing.

Key similarities

Chevron down

Casual Gaming

5.8
PA329CV
G24F-2
5.7
3840 x 2160
RESOLUTION
1920 x 1080
60Hz
REFRESH RATE
170Hz
1000:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
1100:1
350 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
300 nits
Unknown
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
Unknown
80.0 %
DCI-P3 COLOR GAMUT
95.0 %
Matte
COATING
Matte
The Asus PA329CV (IPS) and Gigabyte G24F-2 (IPS) are both poor for casual gaming.

HDR Gaming and Media Consumption

No
PA329CV
G24F-2
No
Both the Asus PA329CV (IPS) and Gigabyte G24F-2 (IPS) are not suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption.

Digital Photo Editing

Yes
PA329CV
G24F-2
Yes
Both the Asus PA329CV (IPS) and Gigabyte G24F-2 (IPS) are suitable for digital photo editing.

HDR Video Editing and Color Grading

No
PA329CV
G24F-2
No
Both the Asus PA329CV (IPS) and Gigabyte G24F-2 (IPS) are not suitable for HDR video editing and color grading.

Give feedback

We’re constantly working to improve.

How the Asus PA329CV (IPS) and the Gigabyte G24F-2 (IPS) compare to other monitors

Chevron down

Spec Comparison

Chevron down
Asus PA329CV (IPS)Gigabyte G24F-2 (IPS)
Asus PA329CV (IPS)Gigabyte G24F-2 (IPS)

GENERAL

Price
$529
$140
Screen Size
32"24"
Resolution
3840 x 21601920 x 1080
Screen Type
LEDLED
Screen Sub-type
IPSIPS
Refresh Rate
60Hz170Hz

COLOR, CONTRAST & BRIGHTNESS

Native Contrast
1000:11100:1
SDR Peak Brightness
350 nits300 nits
HDR Peak Brightness
UnknownUnknown
Suitable for HDR Gaming and Media Consumption
NoNo
sRGB Color Gamut
99.6 %125 %

MOTION CHARACTERISTICS

Total Response Time
15 ms8 ms
Variable Refresh Rate
N/A48 - 180 Hz
Strobing / BFI
NoNo
Persistence Blur Score
5/107.1/10
Ghosting Score
6/107.6/10

TEXT & IMAGE CLARITY

Pixels Per Inch
137 PPI92 PPI
Coating
MatteMatte
Text Clarity Score
7.9/106.2/10
Image Clarity Score
7.9/106.2/10

PORTS & CONNECTIVITY

HDMI 1.4 Ports
00
HDMI 2.0 Ports
22
HDMI 2.1 Ports
00
Micro HDMI Ports
00
DisplayPort 1.2 Ports
11

Give feedback

We're constantly perfecting our model

FAQs

Chevron down

Why trust us

Chevron down
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec monitors team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest monitor information and makes it digestible for you.

By the numbers

210
Monitors evaluated
10,500
Monitors stats compiled
15
Proprietary Monitors ratings developed
107,900
Recommendations made
16,185
Consumer hours saved

About the monitor team

Joe Golden, Ph.D

CEO and Monitors Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.

Jason Lew

Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.

Chandradeep Chowdhury

Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.

Featured in

Color LTT LogoGeekwire logo9to5 Mac logoPhone Arena LogoColor Daring Fireball logo