A comparison of specs, key information, reviews, and best pricing from top retailers
Last updated -- hours ago | Report incorrect information
Company ProductName Specs
Company ProductName Specs
What we think
The PerfectRec monitor team Learn more
Updated April 11, 2024·
If your priority is high-resolution digital photo editing with decent color accuracy, the Asus PA329CV might be more suitable due to its larger screen size and better color coverage for certain color spaces, which can be important for tasks like photo editing. However, the Gigabyte G24F-2 is a more budget-friendly option that still offers good color accuracy and could be better suited for competitive gaming due to its higher refresh rate and quick response time. Keep in mind though, the smaller size and lower resolution of the Gigabyte may not be ideal for productivity tasks that benefit from a larger workspace and sharper text clarity. If high dynamic range (HDR) content is a significant part of your use, neither of these monitors is particularly well-suited for HDR gaming or video editing. Give Feedback
this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the Asus PA329CV (IPS)
- Good for productivity
- Good text clarity
- Good image clarity
Advantages of the Gigabyte G24F-2 (IPS)
- Good refresh rate
- Good response time
Key differences
Competitive Gaming
3.8
5.8
60Hz
REFRESH RATE
170Hz
15.0 ms
TOTAL RESPONSE TIME
8.0 ms
N/A
VARIABLE REFRESH RATE
48 - 180 Hz
No
STROBING / BFI
No
350 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
300 nits
The Gigabyte G24F-2 (IPS) and Asus PA329CV (IPS) are both poor for competitive gaming, though the Gigabyte G24F-2 (IPS) is somewhat better.
Productivity
7.7
4.9
3840 x 2160
RESOLUTION
1920 x 1080
137 PPI
PIXELS PER INCH
92 PPI
Yes
ADJUSTABLE STAND
Yes
Matte
COATING
Matte
The Asus PA329CV (IPS) is good for productivity, while the Gigabyte G24F-2 (IPS) is poor.
Media Consumption
6.5
5.4
3840 x 2160
RESOLUTION
1920 x 1080
1000:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
1100:1
350 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
300 nits
Unknown
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
Unknown
Matte
COATING
Matte
The Asus PA329CV (IPS) is only fair for media consumption, while the Gigabyte G24F-2 (IPS) is poor.
Cost
$529
$140
$0
$200
$400
$600
$800
The Asus PA329CV (IPS) has a price of $529 and the Gigabyte G24F-2 (IPS) costs $140.
Print Photo Editing
No
Yes
The Asus PA329CV (IPS) is not suitable for print photo editing while the Gigabyte G24F-2 (IPS) is suitable for print photo editing.
Key similarities
Casual Gaming
5.8
5.7
3840 x 2160
RESOLUTION
1920 x 1080
60Hz
REFRESH RATE
170Hz
1000:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
1100:1
350 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
300 nits
Unknown
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
Unknown
80.0 %
DCI-P3 COLOR GAMUT
95.0 %
Matte
COATING
Matte
The Asus PA329CV (IPS) and Gigabyte G24F-2 (IPS) are both poor for casual gaming.
HDR Gaming and Media Consumption
No
No
Both the Asus PA329CV (IPS) and Gigabyte G24F-2 (IPS) are not suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption.
Digital Photo Editing
Yes
Yes
Both the Asus PA329CV (IPS) and Gigabyte G24F-2 (IPS) are suitable for digital photo editing.
HDR Video Editing and Color Grading
No
No
Both the Asus PA329CV (IPS) and Gigabyte G24F-2 (IPS) are not suitable for HDR video editing and color grading.
Give feedback
We’re constantly working to improve.
How the Asus PA329CV (IPS) and the Gigabyte G24F-2 (IPS) compare to other monitors
Spec Comparison
 |  | |
| Asus PA329CV (IPS) | Gigabyte G24F-2 (IPS) |
GENERAL | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Price | |||
$529 | $140 | ||
Screen Size | |||
Screen Size | 32" | 24" | |
Resolution | |||
Resolution | 3840 x 2160 | 1920 x 1080 | |
Screen Type | |||
Screen Type | LED | LED | |
Screen Sub-type | |||
Screen Sub-type | IPS | IPS | |
Refresh Rate | |||
Refresh Rate | 60Hz | 170Hz | |
COLOR, CONTRAST & BRIGHTNESS | |||
|---|---|---|---|
Native Contrast | |||
Native Contrast | 1000:1 | 1100:1 | |
SDR Peak Brightness | |||
SDR Peak Brightness | 350 nits | 300 nits | |
HDR Peak Brightness | |||
HDR Peak Brightness | Unknown | Unknown | |
Suitable for HDR Gaming and Media Consumption | |||
Suitable for HDR Gaming and Media Consumption | No | No | |
sRGB Color Gamut | |||
sRGB Color Gamut | 99.6 % | 125 % | |
MOTION CHARACTERISTICS | |||
|---|---|---|---|
Total Response Time | |||
Total Response Time | 15 ms | 8 ms | |
Variable Refresh Rate | |||
Variable Refresh Rate | N/A | 48 - 180 Hz | |
Strobing / BFI | |||
Strobing / BFI | No | No | |
Persistence Blur Score | |||
Persistence Blur Score | 5/10 | 7.1/10 | |
Ghosting Score | |||
Ghosting Score | 6/10 | 7.6/10 | |
TEXT & IMAGE CLARITY | |||
|---|---|---|---|
Pixels Per Inch | |||
Pixels Per Inch | 137 PPI | 92 PPI | |
Coating | |||
Coating | Matte | Matte | |
Text Clarity Score | |||
Text Clarity Score | 7.9/10 | 6.2/10 | |
Image Clarity Score | |||
Image Clarity Score | 7.9/10 | 6.2/10 | |
PORTS & CONNECTIVITY | |||
|---|---|---|---|
HDMI 1.4 Ports | |||
HDMI 1.4 Ports | 0 | 0 | |
HDMI 2.0 Ports | |||
HDMI 2.0 Ports | 2 | 2 | |
HDMI 2.1 Ports | |||
HDMI 2.1 Ports | 0 | 0 | |
Micro HDMI Ports | |||
Micro HDMI Ports | 0 | 0 | |
DisplayPort 1.2 Ports | |||
DisplayPort 1.2 Ports | 1 | 1 | |
Give feedback
We're constantly perfecting our model
More comparisons for you
Compare Asus PA329CV (IPS) vs. Dell U2723QE (IPS Black)
VS
Compare Asus PA329CV (IPS) vs. Gigabyte M32UC (VA)
VS
Compare Asus PA329CV (IPS) vs. KTC M27T20 (VA MiniLED)
VS
Compare Gigabyte G24F-2 (IPS) vs. AOC 24G2SPU (IPS)
VS
Compare Gigabyte G24F-2 (IPS) vs. Lenovo G24-20 (IPS)
VS
Compare Gigabyte G24F-2 (IPS) vs. KTC H27T22 (IPS)
VS
FAQs
Why trust us
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec monitors team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest monitor information and makes it digestible for you.
By the numbers
210
Monitors evaluated
10,500
Monitors stats compiled
15
Proprietary Monitors ratings developed
117,200
Recommendations made
17,580
Consumer hours saved
About the monitor team
Joe Golden, Ph.D
CEO and Monitors Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.
Jason Lew
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.
Chandradeep Chowdhury
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.
Featured in
