If budget is a concern and you need a monitor for tasks like photo editing or everyday productivity with sharp text and image clarity, the Asus PA329CV would be a solid choice; it's also good for casual gaming. On the other hand, if you're willing to invest in a premium monitor, prefer an immersive gaming experience with high contrast and color fidelity, and are interested in HDR content, the Asus PG34WCDM offers superior performance for gaming and watching movies, thanks to its higher refresh rate and OLED technology, but it's not as well-suited for productivity due to its lower resolution and curvature. Give Feedback
this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the Asus PA329CV (IPS)
Good for productivity
Good text clarity
Advantages of the Asus PG34WCDM (W-OLED)
Best in class for casual gaming
Good for media consumption
Very good refresh rate
Best in class contrast
Best in class response time
Key differences
Casual Gaming
5.8/10
9.5/10
3840 x 2160
RESOLUTION
3440 x 1440
60Hz
REFRESH RATE
240Hz
1000:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
Inf:1
350 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
238 nits
Unknown
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
716 nits
80.0 %
DCI-P3 COLOR GAMUT
96.6 %
Matte
COATING
Matte
The Asus PG34WCDM (W-OLED) is best in class for casual gaming, while the Asus PA329CV (IPS) is poor.
Competitive Gaming
3.8/10
5.6/10
60Hz
REFRESH RATE
240Hz
15.0 ms
TOTAL RESPONSE TIME
1.1 ms
N/A
VARIABLE REFRESH RATE
20 - 240 Hz
No
STROBING / BFI
Yes
350 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
238 nits
The Asus PG34WCDM (W-OLED) and Asus PA329CV (IPS) are both poor for competitive gaming, though the Asus PG34WCDM (W-OLED) is somewhat better.
Productivity
7.7/10
5.7/10
3840 x 2160
RESOLUTION
3440 x 1440
137 PPI
PIXELS PER INCH
109 PPI
Yes
ADJUSTABLE STAND
Yes
Matte
COATING
Matte
The Asus PA329CV (IPS) is good for productivity, while the Asus PG34WCDM (W-OLED) is poor.
Media Consumption
6.5/10
7.5/10
3840 x 2160
RESOLUTION
3440 x 1440
1000:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
Inf:1
350 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
238 nits
Unknown
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
716 nits
Matte
COATING
Matte
The Asus PG34WCDM (W-OLED) is good for media consumption, while the Asus PA329CV (IPS) is only fair.
Cost
$529
$1,300
$0
$500
$1,000
$1,500
$2,000
The Asus PA329CV (IPS) has a price of $529 and the Asus PG34WCDM (W-OLED) costs $1,300.
HDR Gaming and Media Consumption
No
Yes
The Asus PA329CV (IPS) is not suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption while the Asus PG34WCDM (W-OLED) is suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption.
Key similarities
Digital Photo Editing
Yes
Yes
Both the Asus PA329CV (IPS) and Asus PG34WCDM (W-OLED) are suitable for digital photo editing.
HDR Video Editing and Color Grading
No
No
Both the Asus PA329CV (IPS) and Asus PG34WCDM (W-OLED) are not suitable for HDR video editing and color grading.
Print Photo Editing
No
No
Both the Asus PA329CV (IPS) and Asus PG34WCDM (W-OLED) are not suitable for print photo editing.
Give feedback
We’re constantly working to improve.
How the Asus PA329CV (IPS) and the Asus PG34WCDM (W-OLED) compare to other monitors
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec monitors team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest monitor information and makes it digestible for you.
By the numbers
210
Monitors evaluated
10,500
Monitors stats compiled
15
Proprietary Monitors ratings developed
117,200
Recommendations made
17,580
Consumer hours saved
About the monitor team
Joe Golden, Ph.D
CEO and Monitors Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.
Jason Lew
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.
Chandradeep Chowdhury
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.