If you prioritize top-notch image quality, color accuracy, and HDR performance, the Asus PA27DCE, an OLED monitor with a larger screen and higher resolution, is suitable for HDR gaming, media consumption, and professional photo editing. However, it's a significant investment. Conversely, the Gigabyte G24F-2 is more budget-friendly, offers good refresh rates for casual gaming but has lower resolution and image clarity and isn't suited for serious HDR content or high-end photo editing. If costs are a concern and your focus is on gaming and general use, the Gigabyte may be the more practical choice. Give Feedback
this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the Asus PA27DCE (W-OLED)
Best in class for casual gaming
Very good for media consumption
Very good image clarity
Best in class contrast
Best in class response time
Advantages of the Gigabyte G24F-2 (IPS)
Good refresh rate
Key differences
Casual Gaming
9.6/10
5.7/10
3840 x 2160
RESOLUTION
1920 x 1080
60Hz
REFRESH RATE
170Hz
Inf:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
1100:1
200 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
300 nits
Unknown
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
Unknown
99.0 %
DCI-P3 COLOR GAMUT
95.0 %
Matte
COATING
Matte
The Asus PA27DCE (W-OLED) is best in class for casual gaming, while the Gigabyte G24F-2 (IPS) is poor.
Productivity
6.6/10
4.9/10
3840 x 2160
RESOLUTION
1920 x 1080
163 PPI
PIXELS PER INCH
92 PPI
Yes
ADJUSTABLE STAND
Yes
Matte
COATING
Matte
The Asus PA27DCE (W-OLED) is only fair for productivity, while the Gigabyte G24F-2 (IPS) is poor.
Media Consumption
8.4/10
5.4/10
3840 x 2160
RESOLUTION
1920 x 1080
Inf:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
1100:1
200 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
300 nits
Unknown
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
Unknown
Matte
COATING
Matte
The Asus PA27DCE (W-OLED) is very good for media consumption, while the Gigabyte G24F-2 (IPS) is poor.
Cost
$1,999
$140
$0
$500
$1,000
$1,500
$2,000
$2,500
$3,000
The Asus PA27DCE (W-OLED) has a price of $1,999 and the Gigabyte G24F-2 (IPS) costs $140.
HDR Gaming and Media Consumption
Yes
No
The Asus PA27DCE (W-OLED) is suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption while the Gigabyte G24F-2 (IPS) is not suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption.
Key similarities
Competitive Gaming
5.8/10
5.8/10
60Hz
REFRESH RATE
170Hz
0.1 ms
TOTAL RESPONSE TIME
8.0 ms
N/A
VARIABLE REFRESH RATE
48 - 180 Hz
No
STROBING / BFI
No
200 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
300 nits
The Asus PA27DCE (W-OLED) and Gigabyte G24F-2 (IPS) are both poor for competitive gaming.
Digital Photo Editing
Yes
Yes
Both the Asus PA27DCE (W-OLED) and Gigabyte G24F-2 (IPS) are suitable for digital photo editing.
HDR Video Editing and Color Grading
No
No
Both the Asus PA27DCE (W-OLED) and Gigabyte G24F-2 (IPS) are not suitable for HDR video editing and color grading.
Print Photo Editing
Yes
Yes
Both the Asus PA27DCE (W-OLED) and Gigabyte G24F-2 (IPS) are suitable for print photo editing.
Give feedback
We’re constantly working to improve.
How the Asus PA27DCE (W-OLED) and the Gigabyte G24F-2 (IPS) compare to other monitors
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec monitors team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest monitor information and makes it digestible for you.
By the numbers
210
Monitors evaluated
10,500
Monitors stats compiled
15
Proprietary Monitors ratings developed
117,200
Recommendations made
17,580
Consumer hours saved
About the monitor team
Joe Golden, Ph.D
CEO and Monitors Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.
Jason Lew
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.
Chandradeep Chowdhury
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.