A comparison of specs, key information, reviews, and best pricing from top retailers
Last updated -- hours ago | Report incorrect information
PA27DCE
Company ProductName Specs




GZ2711
Company ProductName Specs




What we think

Chevron down
PerfectRec Logo
The PerfectRec monitor team Learn more
Updated April 11, 2024·

If you're focused on high-end photo editing, the Asus PA27DCE, with its exceptional color accuracy and depth, stands out despite its higher cost; its suitability for HDR video editing is limited though. The Cooler Master GZ2711 offers better value, still shines in photo editing and casual gaming due to its high color accuracy, and has a significantly higher refresh rate, making it more suitable for competitive gaming. Both are OLED monitors, ensuring deep blacks and high contrast, but neither are ideal for tasks requiring peak brightness. The choice depends on whether competitive gaming and price are more important to you than top-notch color precision for professional photo work. Give Feedback

this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the Asus PA27DCE (W-OLED)
  • Very good for media consumption
  • Very good image clarity
Advantages of the Cooler Master GZ2711 (W-OLED)
  • Best in class for competitive gaming
  • Very good refresh rate
  • Good brightness

Key differences

Chevron down

Competitive Gaming

5.8
PA27DCE
GZ2711
9.6
60Hz
REFRESH RATE
240Hz
0.1 ms
TOTAL RESPONSE TIME
0.3 ms
N/A
VARIABLE REFRESH RATE
48 - 240 Hz
No
STROBING / BFI
No
200 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
450 nits
The Cooler Master GZ2711 (W-OLED) is best in class for competitive gaming, while the Asus PA27DCE (W-OLED) is poor.

Productivity

6.6
PA27DCE
GZ2711
5.8
3840 x 2160
RESOLUTION
2560 x 1440
163 PPI
PIXELS PER INCH
109 PPI
Yes
ADJUSTABLE STAND
Yes
Matte
COATING
Matte
The Asus PA27DCE (W-OLED) is only fair for productivity, while the Cooler Master GZ2711 (W-OLED) is poor.

Media Consumption

8.4
PA27DCE
GZ2711
7.9
3840 x 2160
RESOLUTION
2560 x 1440
Inf:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
Inf:1
200 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
450 nits
Unknown
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
Unknown
Matte
COATING
Matte
The Asus PA27DCE (W-OLED) is very good for media consumption, while the Cooler Master GZ2711 (W-OLED) is good.

Cost

$1,999
PA27DCE
GZ2711
$900
Product image
Product image

$0

$500

$1,000

$1,500

$2,000

$2,500

$3,000

The Asus PA27DCE (W-OLED) has a price of $1,999 and the Cooler Master GZ2711 (W-OLED) costs $900.

Key similarities

Chevron down

Casual Gaming

9.6
PA27DCE
GZ2711
9.7
3840 x 2160
RESOLUTION
2560 x 1440
60Hz
REFRESH RATE
240Hz
Inf:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
Inf:1
200 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
450 nits
Unknown
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
Unknown
99.0 %
DCI-P3 COLOR GAMUT
98.5 %
Matte
COATING
Matte
The Cooler Master GZ2711 (W-OLED) and Asus PA27DCE (W-OLED) are both best in class for casual gaming.

HDR Gaming and Media Consumption

Yes
PA27DCE
GZ2711
Yes
Both the Asus PA27DCE (W-OLED) and Cooler Master GZ2711 (W-OLED) are suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption.

Digital Photo Editing

Yes
PA27DCE
GZ2711
Yes
Both the Asus PA27DCE (W-OLED) and Cooler Master GZ2711 (W-OLED) are suitable for digital photo editing.

HDR Video Editing and Color Grading

No
PA27DCE
GZ2711
No
Both the Asus PA27DCE (W-OLED) and Cooler Master GZ2711 (W-OLED) are not suitable for HDR video editing and color grading.

Print Photo Editing

Yes
PA27DCE
GZ2711
Yes
Both the Asus PA27DCE (W-OLED) and Cooler Master GZ2711 (W-OLED) are suitable for print photo editing.

Give feedback

We’re constantly working to improve.

How the Asus PA27DCE (W-OLED) and the Cooler Master GZ2711 (W-OLED) compare to other monitors

Chevron down

Spec Comparison

Chevron down
Asus PA27DCE (W-OLED)Cooler Master GZ2711 (W-OLED)
Asus PA27DCE (W-OLED)Cooler Master GZ2711 (W-OLED)

GENERAL

Price
$1,999
$900
Screen Size
27"27"
Resolution
3840 x 21602560 x 1440
Screen Type
OLEDOLED
Screen Sub-type
W-OLEDW-OLED
Refresh Rate
60Hz240Hz

COLOR, CONTRAST & BRIGHTNESS

Native Contrast
Inf:1Inf:1
SDR Peak Brightness
200 nits450 nits
HDR Peak Brightness
UnknownUnknown
Suitable for HDR Gaming and Media Consumption
YesYes
sRGB Color Gamut
100 %100 %

MOTION CHARACTERISTICS

Total Response Time
0.1 ms0.3 ms
Variable Refresh Rate
N/A48 - 240 Hz
Strobing / BFI
NoNo
Persistence Blur Score
5/108/10
Ghosting Score
10/109.9/10

TEXT & IMAGE CLARITY

Pixels Per Inch
163 PPI109 PPI
Coating
MatteMatte
Text Clarity Score
6.9/106.6/10
Image Clarity Score
8/107/10

PORTS & CONNECTIVITY

HDMI 1.4 Ports
00
HDMI 2.0 Ports
30
HDMI 2.1 Ports
02
Micro HDMI Ports
00
DisplayPort 1.2 Ports
00

Give feedback

We're constantly perfecting our model

FAQs

Chevron down

Why trust us

Chevron down
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec monitors team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest monitor information and makes it digestible for you.

By the numbers

210
Monitors evaluated
10,500
Monitors stats compiled
15
Proprietary Monitors ratings developed
117,200
Recommendations made
17,580
Consumer hours saved

About the monitor team

Joe Golden, Ph.D

CEO and Monitors Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.

Jason Lew

Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.

Chandradeep Chowdhury

Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.

Featured in

Color LTT LogoGeekwire logo9to5 Mac logoPhone Arena LogoColor Daring Fireball logo