If you prioritize high-resolution digital photo editing with accurate colors, the Asus PA279CRV would serve you well due to its excellent color accuracy and higher pixels per inch. However, if you're looking for a broader screen for multitasking and enjoy gaming with a higher refresh rate and variable refresh rate support, the Gigabyte M34WQ offers a wider display and better gaming features like faster response times and a higher maximum refresh rate, at a lower price point. Neither monitor is particularly suited for HDR gaming or media consumption. Choose the Asus for photo editing precision or the Gigabyte for an immersive gaming and productivity experience. Give Feedback
this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the Asus PA279CRV (IPS)
Good for productivity
Very good text clarity
Very good image clarity
Advantages of the Gigabyte M34WQ (IPS)
Good response time
Key differences
Productivity
7.9/10
6.3/10
3840 x 2160
RESOLUTION
3440 x 1440
163 PPI
PIXELS PER INCH
110 PPI
Yes
ADJUSTABLE STAND
Yes
Matte
COATING
Matte
The Asus PA279CRV (IPS) is good for productivity, while the Gigabyte M34WQ (IPS) is only fair.
Media Consumption
6.6/10
6.0/10
3840 x 2160
RESOLUTION
3440 x 1440
920:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
1074:1
376 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
379 nits
436 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
372 nits
Matte
COATING
Matte
The Asus PA279CRV (IPS) and Gigabyte M34WQ (IPS) are both only fair for media consumption, though the Asus PA279CRV (IPS) is somewhat better.
Cost
$469
$330
$100
$200
$300
$400
$500
$600
$700
The Asus PA279CRV (IPS) has a price of $469 and the Gigabyte M34WQ (IPS) costs $330.
Print Photo Editing
Yes
No
The Asus PA279CRV (IPS) is suitable for print photo editing while the Gigabyte M34WQ (IPS) is not suitable for print photo editing.
Key similarities
Casual Gaming
5.8/10
5.9/10
3840 x 2160
RESOLUTION
3440 x 1440
60Hz
REFRESH RATE
144Hz
920:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
1074:1
376 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
379 nits
436 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
372 nits
98.5 %
DCI-P3 COLOR GAMUT
87.7 %
Matte
COATING
Matte
The Gigabyte M34WQ (IPS) and Asus PA279CRV (IPS) are both poor for casual gaming.
Competitive Gaming
4.9/10
4.5/10
60Hz
REFRESH RATE
144Hz
17.0 ms
TOTAL RESPONSE TIME
8.5 ms
48 - 60 Hz
VARIABLE REFRESH RATE
20 - 144 Hz
No
STROBING / BFI
Yes
376 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
379 nits
The Asus PA279CRV (IPS) and Gigabyte M34WQ (IPS) are both poor for competitive gaming.
HDR Gaming and Media Consumption
No
No
Both the Asus PA279CRV (IPS) and Gigabyte M34WQ (IPS) are not suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption.
Digital Photo Editing
Yes
Yes
Both the Asus PA279CRV (IPS) and Gigabyte M34WQ (IPS) are suitable for digital photo editing.
HDR Video Editing and Color Grading
No
No
Both the Asus PA279CRV (IPS) and Gigabyte M34WQ (IPS) are not suitable for HDR video editing and color grading.
Give feedback
We’re constantly working to improve.
How the Asus PA279CRV (IPS) and the Gigabyte M34WQ (IPS) compare to other monitors
"The ASUS PA279CRV is an excellent value 4K IPS monitor for color-critical work involving sRGB, Rec.709, DCI-P3 and Adobe RGB color spaces. On top of that, it features rich connectivity options, a robust design and plenty of additional features."
"If you want a 34″ 3440×1440 ultrawide gaming monitor with a fast response time speed, smooth VRR performance, vibrant colors and crisp details, the Gigabyte M34WQ is one of the best options below $450. Additionally, it has an ergonomic stand, rich connectivity options and plenty of extra features, such as a built-in KVM switch. Some users might not be pleased by its flat screen, but at a certain viewing distance, it feels completely natural."
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec monitors team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest monitor information and makes it digestible for you.
By the numbers
210
Monitors evaluated
10,500
Monitors stats compiled
15
Proprietary Monitors ratings developed
117,200
Recommendations made
17,580
Consumer hours saved
About the monitor team
Joe Golden, Ph.D
CEO and Monitors Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.
Jason Lew
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.
Chandradeep Chowdhury
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.