If you prioritize high resolutions and color accuracy for tasks such as digital photo editing, the Asus PA279CRV with its IPS panel would be a better choice. However, if competitive gaming is your main concern, the BenQ XL2566K offers superior refresh rates and response times, enhancing fast-paced gameplay but at a lower resolution and with less color fidelity. The Asus will perform better for productivity due to its higher resolution, which provides more screen real estate and clearer text. Neither is particularly suited for HDR gaming and media consumption. Choose the Asus for a balance of price, detail, and color or the BenQ for high-speed gaming performance. Give Feedback
this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the Asus PA279CRV (IPS)
Good for productivity
Very good text clarity
Very good image clarity
Advantages of the BenQ XL2566K (TN)
Excellent for competitive gaming
Best in class refresh rate
Very good response time
Key differences
Competitive Gaming
4.9/10
9.2/10
60Hz
REFRESH RATE
360Hz
17.0 ms
TOTAL RESPONSE TIME
5.2 ms
48 - 60 Hz
VARIABLE REFRESH RATE
20 - 360 Hz
No
STROBING / BFI
Yes
376 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
303 nits
The BenQ XL2566K (TN) is excellent for competitive gaming, while the Asus PA279CRV (IPS) is poor.
Productivity
7.9/10
4.8/10
3840 x 2160
RESOLUTION
1920 x 1080
163 PPI
PIXELS PER INCH
91 PPI
Yes
ADJUSTABLE STAND
Yes
Matte
COATING
Matte
The Asus PA279CRV (IPS) is good for productivity, while the BenQ XL2566K (TN) is poor.
Media Consumption
6.6/10
5.1/10
3840 x 2160
RESOLUTION
1920 x 1080
920:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
1131:1
376 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
303 nits
436 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
N/A
Matte
COATING
Matte
The Asus PA279CRV (IPS) is only fair for media consumption, while the BenQ XL2566K (TN) is poor.
Cost
$469
$599
$200
$300
$400
$500
$600
$700
$800
$900
The Asus PA279CRV (IPS) has a price of $469 and the BenQ XL2566K (TN) costs $599.
Digital Photo Editing
Yes
No
The Asus PA279CRV (IPS) is suitable for digital photo editing while the BenQ XL2566K (TN) is not suitable for digital photo editing.
Print Photo Editing
Yes
No
The Asus PA279CRV (IPS) is suitable for print photo editing while the BenQ XL2566K (TN) is not suitable for print photo editing.
Key similarities
Casual Gaming
5.8/10
5.9/10
3840 x 2160
RESOLUTION
1920 x 1080
60Hz
REFRESH RATE
360Hz
920:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
1131:1
376 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
303 nits
436 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
N/A
98.5 %
DCI-P3 COLOR GAMUT
N/A
Matte
COATING
Matte
The BenQ XL2566K (TN) and Asus PA279CRV (IPS) are both poor for casual gaming.
HDR Gaming and Media Consumption
No
No
Both the Asus PA279CRV (IPS) and BenQ XL2566K (TN) are not suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption.
HDR Video Editing and Color Grading
No
No
Both the Asus PA279CRV (IPS) and BenQ XL2566K (TN) are not suitable for HDR video editing and color grading.
Give feedback
We’re constantly working to improve.
How the Asus PA279CRV (IPS) and the BenQ XL2566K (TN) compare to other monitors
"The ASUS PA279CRV is an excellent value 4K IPS monitor for color-critical work involving sRGB, Rec.709, DCI-P3 and Adobe RGB color spaces. On top of that, it features rich connectivity options, a robust design and plenty of additional features."
"It’s not for everyone in the same way that a top fuel dragster isn’t everyone’s perfect daily driver. The BenQ Zowie XL2566K succeeds in delivering the fastest, sharpest and smoothest display for pro FPS players and that’s all it wanted to do. Its other limitations and premium price tag mean it’s a bespoke tool for a niche market, rather than another general gaming monitor for those who like playing games."
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec monitors team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest monitor information and makes it digestible for you.
By the numbers
210
Monitors evaluated
10,500
Monitors stats compiled
15
Proprietary Monitors ratings developed
116,900
Recommendations made
17,535
Consumer hours saved
About the monitor team
Joe Golden, Ph.D
CEO and Monitors Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.
Jason Lew
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.
Chandradeep Chowdhury
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.