If you prioritize high-resolution image clarity and color accuracy for professional photo and video editing tasks, the Apple Pro Display XDR is an excellent choice, though it comes at a high price. However, if your main interest lies in competitive gaming, you'll benefit more from the Dell AW2524H's extremely high refresh rate and rapid response time, which are critical for fast-paced action; plus, it's significantly more affordable. The Pro Display XDR is also suitable for media consumption with superior brightness and color gamut, but for everyday productivity, the differences may not justify the cost over the Dell monitor. Give Feedback
this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the Apple Pro Display XDR (IPS FALD)
Good for casual gaming
Best in class for productivity
Very good for media consumption
Excellent text clarity
Excellent image clarity
Good contrast
Best in class brightness
Good color volume
Advantages of the Dell AW2524H (IPS)
Best in class for competitive gaming
Best in class refresh rate
Very good response time
Key differences
Casual Gaming
7.8/10
6.1/10
6016 x 3384
RESOLUTION
1920 x 1080
60Hz
REFRESH RATE
500Hz
1000:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
1031:1
1600 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
390 nits
1600 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
464 nits
98.7 %
DCI-P3 COLOR GAMUT
87.5 %
Glossy
COATING
Matte
The Apple Pro Display XDR (IPS FALD) is good for casual gaming, while the Dell AW2524H (IPS) is only fair.
Competitive Gaming
3.9/10
9.5/10
60Hz
REFRESH RATE
500Hz
20.0 ms
TOTAL RESPONSE TIME
5.5 ms
N/A
VARIABLE REFRESH RATE
20 - 500 Hz
No
STROBING / BFI
Yes
1600 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
390 nits
The Dell AW2524H (IPS) is best in class for competitive gaming, while the Apple Pro Display XDR (IPS FALD) is poor.
Productivity
9.8/10
4.9/10
6016 x 3384
RESOLUTION
1920 x 1080
216 PPI
PIXELS PER INCH
91 PPI
Yes
ADJUSTABLE STAND
Yes
Glossy
COATING
Matte
The Apple Pro Display XDR (IPS FALD) is best in class for productivity, while the Dell AW2524H (IPS) is poor.
Media Consumption
8.1/10
5.4/10
6016 x 3384
RESOLUTION
1920 x 1080
1000:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
1031:1
1600 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
390 nits
1600 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
464 nits
Glossy
COATING
Matte
The Apple Pro Display XDR (IPS FALD) is very good for media consumption, while the Dell AW2524H (IPS) is poor.
Cost
$4,999
$500
$0
$1,000
$2,000
$3,000
$4,000
The Apple Pro Display XDR (IPS FALD) has a price of $4,999 and the Dell AW2524H (IPS) costs $500.
HDR Gaming and Media Consumption
Yes
No
The Apple Pro Display XDR (IPS FALD) is suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption while the Dell AW2524H (IPS) is not suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption.
Digital Photo Editing
No
Yes
The Apple Pro Display XDR (IPS FALD) is not suitable for digital photo editing while the Dell AW2524H (IPS) is suitable for digital photo editing.
HDR Video Editing and Color Grading
Yes
No
The Apple Pro Display XDR (IPS FALD) is suitable for HDR video editing and color grading while the Dell AW2524H (IPS) is not suitable for HDR video editing and color grading.
Print Photo Editing
Yes
No
The Apple Pro Display XDR (IPS FALD) is suitable for print photo editing while the Dell AW2524H (IPS) is not suitable for print photo editing.
Give feedback
We’re constantly working to improve.
How the Apple Pro Display XDR (IPS FALD) and the Dell AW2524H (IPS) compare to other monitors
"Apple's Pro Display XDR provides exceptional color accuracy and build quality at a price that's quite competitive with those of reference-grade pro monitors. It's exquisite enough that swallowing the wildly extravagant cost of its Pro Stand is worth it."
"If you have the system for it, the Alienware AW2524H is the perfect display to show off next level frame rates and control response. With higher contrast and color volume than its 360 Hz competition, it currently has no equal."
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec monitors team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest monitor information and makes it digestible for you.
By the numbers
210
Monitors evaluated
10,500
Monitors stats compiled
15
Proprietary Monitors ratings developed
116,900
Recommendations made
17,535
Consumer hours saved
About the monitor team
Joe Golden, Ph.D
CEO and Monitors Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.
Jason Lew
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.
Chandradeep Chowdhury
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.