If your focus is on professional HDR video editing or tasks requiring top-notch image clarity and color accuracy, the Apple Pro Display XDR excels, offering exceptional brightness and advanced color ranges suitable for print photo editing. However, if you're focused on digital photo editing with excellent text quality and you'd like to save a substantial amount of money, the Apple Studio Display is a very capable alternative, albeit with lower brightness and not quite as suitable for tasks demanding the highest HDR and color performance. Neither display is ideal for gaming due to their lower refresh rates, especially not for competitive gaming where high refresh rates and quick response times are critical. Both are excellent for general media consumption, but the Pro Display XDR will have a noticeable edge in HDR content. Choose based on whether the extra cost of the Pro Display XDR is justified for your specific professional needs. Give Feedback
this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the Apple Pro Display XDR (IPS FALD)
Good for casual gaming
Very good for media consumption
Good contrast
Best in class brightness
Good color volume
Advantages of the Apple Studio Display (IPS)
Best in class text clarity
Best in class image clarity
Key differences
Casual Gaming
7.8/10
6.1/10
6016 x 3384
RESOLUTION
5120 x 2880
60Hz
REFRESH RATE
60Hz
1000:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
1052:1
1600 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
584 nits
1600 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
N/A
98.7 %
DCI-P3 COLOR GAMUT
N/A
Glossy
COATING
Glossy
The Apple Pro Display XDR (IPS FALD) is good for casual gaming, while the Apple Studio Display (IPS) is only fair.
Competitive Gaming
3.9/10
5.0/10
60Hz
REFRESH RATE
60Hz
20.0 ms
TOTAL RESPONSE TIME
20.4 ms
N/A
VARIABLE REFRESH RATE
N/A
No
STROBING / BFI
No
1600 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
584 nits
The Apple Studio Display (IPS) and Apple Pro Display XDR (IPS FALD) are both poor for competitive gaming, though the Apple Studio Display (IPS) is somewhat better.
Media Consumption
8.1/10
7.0/10
6016 x 3384
RESOLUTION
5120 x 2880
1000:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
1052:1
1600 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
584 nits
1600 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
N/A
Glossy
COATING
Glossy
The Apple Pro Display XDR (IPS FALD) is very good for media consumption, while the Apple Studio Display (IPS) is good.
Cost
$4,999
$1,599
$500
$1,000
$1,500
$2,000
$2,500
$3,000
$3,500
$4,000
The Apple Pro Display XDR (IPS FALD) has a price of $4,999 and the Apple Studio Display (IPS) costs $1,599.
HDR Gaming and Media Consumption
Yes
No
The Apple Pro Display XDR (IPS FALD) is suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption while the Apple Studio Display (IPS) is not suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption.
Digital Photo Editing
No
Yes
The Apple Pro Display XDR (IPS FALD) is not suitable for digital photo editing while the Apple Studio Display (IPS) is suitable for digital photo editing.
HDR Video Editing and Color Grading
Yes
No
The Apple Pro Display XDR (IPS FALD) is suitable for HDR video editing and color grading while the Apple Studio Display (IPS) is not suitable for HDR video editing and color grading.
Print Photo Editing
Yes
No
The Apple Pro Display XDR (IPS FALD) is suitable for print photo editing while the Apple Studio Display (IPS) is not suitable for print photo editing.
Key similarities
Productivity
9.8/10
9.5/10
6016 x 3384
RESOLUTION
5120 x 2880
216 PPI
PIXELS PER INCH
218 PPI
Yes
ADJUSTABLE STAND
No
Glossy
COATING
Glossy
The Apple Pro Display XDR (IPS FALD) and Apple Studio Display (IPS) are both best in class for productivity.
Give feedback
We’re constantly working to improve.
How the Apple Pro Display XDR (IPS FALD) and the Apple Studio Display (IPS) compare to other monitors
"Apple's Pro Display XDR provides exceptional color accuracy and build quality at a price that's quite competitive with those of reference-grade pro monitors. It's exquisite enough that swallowing the wildly extravagant cost of its Pro Stand is worth it."
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec monitors team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest monitor information and makes it digestible for you.
By the numbers
210
Monitors evaluated
10,500
Monitors stats compiled
15
Proprietary Monitors ratings developed
116,900
Recommendations made
17,535
Consumer hours saved
About the monitor team
Joe Golden, Ph.D
CEO and Monitors Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.
Jason Lew
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.
Chandradeep Chowdhury
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.