If you prioritize high-end gaming with deeper blacks and more vibrant colors, the AOC AG456UCZD (W-OLED) might suit you well, despite its higher cost. However, it's not the best for productivity due to lower text and image clarity. On the other hand, the LG 32GP850 (IPS) offers a good balance for casual gaming and productivity at a lower price point, but it won't match the AOC's performance for competitive gaming or HDR media. Its color accuracy is adequate for digital photo editing but falls short for professional HDR video editing. Both monitors have their strengths, so your choice should align with your primary use: exceptional gaming or well-rounded everyday use. Give Feedback
this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the AOC AG456UCZD (W-OLED)
Best in class for casual gaming
Very good refresh rate
Best in class contrast
Best in class response time
Advantages of the LG 32GP850 (IPS)
Good brightness
Key differences
Casual Gaming
9.6/10
5.8/10
3440 x 1440
RESOLUTION
2560 x 1440
240Hz
REFRESH RATE
180Hz
Inf:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
1037:1
200 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
412 nits
Unknown
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
430 nits
98.5 %
DCI-P3 COLOR GAMUT
95.5 %
Matte
COATING
Matte
The AOC AG456UCZD (W-OLED) is best in class for casual gaming, while the LG 32GP850 (IPS) is poor.
Competitive Gaming
6.0/10
4.8/10
240Hz
REFRESH RATE
180Hz
0.0 ms
TOTAL RESPONSE TIME
6.2 ms
48 - 240 Hz
VARIABLE REFRESH RATE
20 - 180 Hz
No
STROBING / BFI
Yes
200 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
412 nits
The AOC AG456UCZD (W-OLED) is only fair for competitive gaming, while the LG 32GP850 (IPS) is poor.
Productivity
3.8/10
5.0/10
3440 x 1440
RESOLUTION
2560 x 1440
83 PPI
PIXELS PER INCH
93 PPI
Yes
ADJUSTABLE STAND
Yes
Matte
COATING
Matte
The LG 32GP850 (IPS) and AOC AG456UCZD (W-OLED) are both poor for productivity, though the LG 32GP850 (IPS) is somewhat better.
Cost
$1,400
$600
$0
$500
$1,000
$1,500
$2,000
$2,500
The AOC AG456UCZD (W-OLED) has a price of $1,400 and the LG 32GP850 (IPS) costs $600.
HDR Gaming and Media Consumption
Yes
No
The AOC AG456UCZD (W-OLED) is suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption while the LG 32GP850 (IPS) is not suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption.
Print Photo Editing
Yes
No
The AOC AG456UCZD (W-OLED) is suitable for print photo editing while the LG 32GP850 (IPS) is not suitable for print photo editing.
Key similarities
Media Consumption
5.9/10
5.5/10
3440 x 1440
RESOLUTION
2560 x 1440
Inf:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
1037:1
200 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
412 nits
Unknown
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
430 nits
Matte
COATING
Matte
The AOC AG456UCZD (W-OLED) and LG 32GP850 (IPS) are both poor for media consumption.
Digital Photo Editing
Yes
Yes
Both the AOC AG456UCZD (W-OLED) and LG 32GP850 (IPS) are suitable for digital photo editing.
HDR Video Editing and Color Grading
No
No
Both the AOC AG456UCZD (W-OLED) and LG 32GP850 (IPS) are not suitable for HDR video editing and color grading.
Give feedback
We’re constantly working to improve.
How the AOC AG456UCZD (W-OLED) and the LG 32GP850 (IPS) compare to other monitors
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec monitors team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest monitor information and makes it digestible for you.
By the numbers
210
Monitors evaluated
10,500
Monitors stats compiled
15
Proprietary Monitors ratings developed
116,900
Recommendations made
17,535
Consumer hours saved
About the monitor team
Joe Golden, Ph.D
CEO and Monitors Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.
Jason Lew
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.
Chandradeep Chowdhury
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.