A comparison of specs, key information, reviews, and best pricing from top retailers
Last updated -- hours ago | Report incorrect information
AG456UCZD
Company ProductName Specs




27GR95QL
Company ProductName Specs




What we think

Chevron down
PerfectRec Logo
The PerfectRec monitor team Learn more
Updated April 23, 2024·

The AOC monitor's larger screen and ultrawide aspect ratio are better suited for an immersive experience in gaming and media consumption, with excellent contrast. Its extra width makes multitasking easier, hence it's good for productivity. However, it's less sharp due to its size and resolution, could be an issue for detailed work. The LG offers a more balanced experience with a higher pixel density for sharp images, making it suitable for gaming and general use, but it has a smaller screen which may be less immersive. If you prioritize a wide display and can afford it, go for the AOC, but for sharper images and a lower cost, the LG is a strong option. Give Feedback

this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the AOC AG456UCZD (W-OLED)
  • The AOC AG456UCZD (W-OLED) has no clear advantages over the LG 27GR95QL (W-OLED).
Advantages of the LG 27GR95QL (W-OLED)
  • Best in class for competitive gaming
  • Very good for media consumption
  • Good brightness

Key differences

Chevron down

Competitive Gaming

6.0
AG456UCZD
27GR95QL
9.6
240Hz
REFRESH RATE
240Hz
0.0 ms
TOTAL RESPONSE TIME
0.3 ms
48 - 240 Hz
VARIABLE REFRESH RATE
48 - 240 Hz
No
STROBING / BFI
No
200 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
600 nits
The LG 27GR95QL (W-OLED) is best in class for competitive gaming, while the AOC AG456UCZD (W-OLED) is only fair.

Productivity

3.8
AG456UCZD
27GR95QL
5.8
3440 x 1440
RESOLUTION
2560 x 1440
83 PPI
PIXELS PER INCH
108 PPI
Yes
ADJUSTABLE STAND
Yes
Matte
COATING
Matte
The LG 27GR95QL (W-OLED) and AOC AG456UCZD (W-OLED) are both poor for productivity, though the LG 27GR95QL (W-OLED) is somewhat better.

Media Consumption

5.9
AG456UCZD
27GR95QL
8.2
3440 x 1440
RESOLUTION
2560 x 1440
Inf:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
Inf:1
200 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
600 nits
Unknown
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
Unknown
Matte
COATING
Matte
The LG 27GR95QL (W-OLED) is very good for media consumption, while the AOC AG456UCZD (W-OLED) is poor.

Cost

$1,400
AG456UCZD
27GR95QL
$992
Product image
Product image

$500

$1,000

$1,500

$2,000

$2,500

The AOC AG456UCZD (W-OLED) has a price of $1,400 and the LG 27GR95QL (W-OLED) costs $992.

Print Photo Editing

Yes
AG456UCZD
27GR95QL
No
The AOC AG456UCZD (W-OLED) is suitable for print photo editing while the LG 27GR95QL (W-OLED) is not suitable for print photo editing.

Key similarities

Chevron down

Casual Gaming

9.6
AG456UCZD
27GR95QL
9.8
3440 x 1440
RESOLUTION
2560 x 1440
240Hz
REFRESH RATE
240Hz
Inf:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
Inf:1
200 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
600 nits
Unknown
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
Unknown
98.5 %
DCI-P3 COLOR GAMUT
98.5 %
Matte
COATING
Matte
The LG 27GR95QL (W-OLED) and AOC AG456UCZD (W-OLED) are both best in class for casual gaming.

HDR Gaming and Media Consumption

Yes
AG456UCZD
27GR95QL
Yes
Both the AOC AG456UCZD (W-OLED) and LG 27GR95QL (W-OLED) are suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption.

Digital Photo Editing

Yes
AG456UCZD
27GR95QL
Yes
Both the AOC AG456UCZD (W-OLED) and LG 27GR95QL (W-OLED) are suitable for digital photo editing.

HDR Video Editing and Color Grading

No
AG456UCZD
27GR95QL
No
Both the AOC AG456UCZD (W-OLED) and LG 27GR95QL (W-OLED) are not suitable for HDR video editing and color grading.

Give feedback

We’re constantly working to improve.

How the AOC AG456UCZD (W-OLED) and the LG 27GR95QL (W-OLED) compare to other monitors

Chevron down

Spec Comparison

Chevron down
AOC AG456UCZD (W-OLED)LG 27GR95QL (W-OLED)
AOC AG456UCZD (W-OLED)LG 27GR95QL (W-OLED)

GENERAL

Price
$1,400
$992
Screen Size
44.5"27"
Resolution
3440 x 14402560 x 1440
Screen Type
OLEDOLED
Screen Sub-type
W-OLEDW-OLED
Refresh Rate
240Hz240Hz

COLOR, CONTRAST & BRIGHTNESS

Native Contrast
Inf:1Inf:1
SDR Peak Brightness
200 nits600 nits
HDR Peak Brightness
UnknownUnknown
Suitable for HDR Gaming and Media Consumption
YesYes
sRGB Color Gamut
100 %100 %

MOTION CHARACTERISTICS

Total Response Time
0.03 ms0.3 ms
Variable Refresh Rate
48 - 240 Hz48 - 240 Hz
Strobing / BFI
NoNo
Persistence Blur Score
8/108/10
Ghosting Score
10/109.9/10

TEXT & IMAGE CLARITY

Pixels Per Inch
83 PPI108 PPI
Coating
MatteMatte
Text Clarity Score
3.8/106.6/10
Image Clarity Score
4.9/107/10

PORTS & CONNECTIVITY

HDMI 1.4 Ports
00
HDMI 2.0 Ports
00
HDMI 2.1 Ports
32
Micro HDMI Ports
00
DisplayPort 1.2 Ports
00

Give feedback

We're constantly perfecting our model

FAQs

Chevron down

Why trust us

Chevron down
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec monitors team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest monitor information and makes it digestible for you.

By the numbers

210
Monitors evaluated
10,500
Monitors stats compiled
15
Proprietary Monitors ratings developed
116,900
Recommendations made
17,535
Consumer hours saved

About the monitor team

Joe Golden, Ph.D

CEO and Monitors Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.

Jason Lew

Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.

Chandradeep Chowdhury

Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.

Featured in

Color LTT LogoGeekwire logo9to5 Mac logoPhone Arena LogoColor Daring Fireball logo