A comparison of specs, key information, reviews, and best pricing from top retailers
Last updated -- hours ago | Report incorrect information
AG276QZD
Company ProductName Specs




32GP850
Company ProductName Specs




What we think

Chevron down
PerfectRec Logo
The PerfectRec monitor team Learn more
Updated April 11, 2024·

If you prioritize top-notch contrast and response time for immersive and reactive gaming, the AOC AG276QZD with its OLED panel is an excellent choice, although it’s more expensive and not ideal for productivity due to its fair image clarity and text quality. On the other hand, the LG 32GP850 offers good gaming performance and better suitability for productivity at a lower price, but can’t match the perfect contrast of OLED and is less suitable for fast-paced competitive gaming due to its slightly slower response time. Neither monitor is optimal for professional color work or HDR video editing. Give Feedback

this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the AOC AG276QZD (W-OLED)
  • Best in class for casual gaming
  • Best in class for competitive gaming
  • Good for media consumption
  • Very good refresh rate
  • Best in class contrast
  • Best in class response time
Advantages of the LG 32GP850 (IPS)
  • Good brightness

Key differences

Chevron down

Casual Gaming

9.7
AG276QZD
32GP850
5.8
2560 x 1440
RESOLUTION
2560 x 1440
240Hz
REFRESH RATE
180Hz
Inf:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
1037:1
284 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
412 nits
379 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
430 nits
96.0 %
DCI-P3 COLOR GAMUT
95.5 %
Matte
COATING
Matte
The AOC AG276QZD (W-OLED) is best in class for casual gaming, while the LG 32GP850 (IPS) is poor.

Competitive Gaming

9.6
AG276QZD
32GP850
4.8
240Hz
REFRESH RATE
180Hz
0.3 ms
TOTAL RESPONSE TIME
6.2 ms
20 - 240 Hz
VARIABLE REFRESH RATE
20 - 180 Hz
No
STROBING / BFI
Yes
284 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
412 nits
The AOC AG276QZD (W-OLED) is best in class for competitive gaming, while the LG 32GP850 (IPS) is poor.

Productivity

5.7
AG276QZD
32GP850
5.0
2560 x 1440
RESOLUTION
2560 x 1440
108 PPI
PIXELS PER INCH
93 PPI
Yes
ADJUSTABLE STAND
Yes
Matte
COATING
Matte
The AOC AG276QZD (W-OLED) and LG 32GP850 (IPS) are both poor for productivity, though the AOC AG276QZD (W-OLED) is somewhat better.

Media Consumption

7.8
AG276QZD
32GP850
5.5
2560 x 1440
RESOLUTION
2560 x 1440
Inf:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
1037:1
284 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
412 nits
379 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
430 nits
Matte
COATING
Matte
The AOC AG276QZD (W-OLED) is good for media consumption, while the LG 32GP850 (IPS) is poor.

Cost

$700
AG276QZD
32GP850
$600
Product image
Product image

$200

$400

$600

$800

$1,000

$1,200

The AOC AG276QZD (W-OLED) has a price of $700 and the LG 32GP850 (IPS) costs $600.

HDR Gaming and Media Consumption

Yes
AG276QZD
32GP850
No
The AOC AG276QZD (W-OLED) is suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption while the LG 32GP850 (IPS) is not suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption.

Key similarities

Chevron down

Digital Photo Editing

Yes
AG276QZD
32GP850
Yes
Both the AOC AG276QZD (W-OLED) and LG 32GP850 (IPS) are suitable for digital photo editing.

HDR Video Editing and Color Grading

No
AG276QZD
32GP850
No
Both the AOC AG276QZD (W-OLED) and LG 32GP850 (IPS) are not suitable for HDR video editing and color grading.

Print Photo Editing

No
AG276QZD
32GP850
No
Both the AOC AG276QZD (W-OLED) and LG 32GP850 (IPS) are not suitable for print photo editing.

Give feedback

We’re constantly working to improve.

How the AOC AG276QZD (W-OLED) and the LG 32GP850 (IPS) compare to other monitors

Chevron down

Spec Comparison

Chevron down
AOC AG276QZD (W-OLED)LG 32GP850 (IPS)
AOC AG276QZD (W-OLED)LG 32GP850 (IPS)

GENERAL

Price
$700
$600
Screen Size
27"32"
Resolution
2560 x 14402560 x 1440
Screen Type
OLEDLED
Screen Sub-type
W-OLEDIPS
Refresh Rate
240Hz180Hz

COLOR, CONTRAST & BRIGHTNESS

Native Contrast
Inf:11037:1
SDR Peak Brightness
284 nits412 nits
HDR Peak Brightness
379 nits430 nits
Suitable for HDR Gaming and Media Consumption
YesNo
sRGB Color Gamut
100 %100 %

MOTION CHARACTERISTICS

Total Response Time
0.3 ms6.2 ms
Variable Refresh Rate
20 - 240 Hz20 - 180 Hz
Strobing / BFI
NoYes
Persistence Blur Score
8/107.3/10
Ghosting Score
9.9/108/10

TEXT & IMAGE CLARITY

Pixels Per Inch
108 PPI93 PPI
Coating
MatteMatte
Text Clarity Score
6.6/106.3/10
Image Clarity Score
7/106.3/10

PORTS & CONNECTIVITY

HDMI 1.4 Ports
01
HDMI 2.0 Ports
22
HDMI 2.1 Ports
00
Micro HDMI Ports
00
DisplayPort 1.2 Ports
00

Give feedback

We're constantly perfecting our model

FAQs

Chevron down

Why trust us

Chevron down
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec monitors team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest monitor information and makes it digestible for you.

By the numbers

210
Monitors evaluated
10,500
Monitors stats compiled
15
Proprietary Monitors ratings developed
116,900
Recommendations made
17,535
Consumer hours saved

About the monitor team

Joe Golden, Ph.D

CEO and Monitors Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.

Jason Lew

Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.

Chandradeep Chowdhury

Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.

Featured in

Color LTT LogoGeekwire logo9to5 Mac logoPhone Arena LogoColor Daring Fireball logo