A comparison of specs, key information, reviews, and best pricing from top retailers
Last updated -- hours ago | Report incorrect information
Company ProductName Specs
Company ProductName Specs
What we think
The PerfectRec monitor team Learn more
Updated April 11, 2024·
If you're an avid gamer looking for a high refresh rate and rapid response time without spending as much, the AOC monitor provides a very good gaming experience due to its exceptional contrast and virtually no ghosting, but it's less suitable for productivity and media consumption tasks where image clarity and color accuracy are crucial. Alternatively, if you're a creative professional seeking unparalleled color precision and image clarity for tasks like HDR video editing and digital photo editing, and willing to invest more, the Apple Pro Display XDR with its superior resolution and color gamut may be the better choice, although it's not ideal for gaming due to its lower refresh rate. Give Feedback
this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the AOC AG276QZD (W-OLED)
- Best in class for casual gaming
- Best in class for competitive gaming
- Very good refresh rate
- Best in class contrast
- Best in class response time
Advantages of the Apple Pro Display XDR (IPS FALD)
- Best in class for productivity
- Very good for media consumption
- Excellent text clarity
- Excellent image clarity
- Best in class brightness
- Good color volume
Key differences
Casual Gaming
9.7
7.8
2560 x 1440
RESOLUTION
6016 x 3384
240Hz
REFRESH RATE
60Hz
Inf:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
1000:1
284 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
1600 nits
379 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
1600 nits
96.0 %
DCI-P3 COLOR GAMUT
98.7 %
Matte
COATING
Glossy
The AOC AG276QZD (W-OLED) is best in class for casual gaming, while the Apple Pro Display XDR (IPS FALD) is good.
Competitive Gaming
9.6
3.9
240Hz
REFRESH RATE
60Hz
0.3 ms
TOTAL RESPONSE TIME
20.0 ms
20 - 240 Hz
VARIABLE REFRESH RATE
N/A
No
STROBING / BFI
No
284 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
1600 nits
The AOC AG276QZD (W-OLED) is best in class for competitive gaming, while the Apple Pro Display XDR (IPS FALD) is poor.
Productivity
5.7
9.8
2560 x 1440
RESOLUTION
6016 x 3384
108 PPI
PIXELS PER INCH
216 PPI
Yes
ADJUSTABLE STAND
Yes
Matte
COATING
Glossy
The Apple Pro Display XDR (IPS FALD) is best in class for productivity, while the AOC AG276QZD (W-OLED) is poor.
Cost
$700
$4,999
$0
$1,000
$2,000
$3,000
$4,000
The AOC AG276QZD (W-OLED) has a price of $700 and the Apple Pro Display XDR (IPS FALD) costs $4,999.
Digital Photo Editing
Yes
No
The AOC AG276QZD (W-OLED) is suitable for digital photo editing while the Apple Pro Display XDR (IPS FALD) is not suitable for digital photo editing.
HDR Video Editing and Color Grading
No
Yes
The AOC AG276QZD (W-OLED) is not suitable for HDR video editing and color grading while the Apple Pro Display XDR (IPS FALD) is suitable for HDR video editing and color grading.
Print Photo Editing
No
Yes
The AOC AG276QZD (W-OLED) is not suitable for print photo editing while the Apple Pro Display XDR (IPS FALD) is suitable for print photo editing.
Key similarities
Media Consumption
7.8
8.1
2560 x 1440
RESOLUTION
6016 x 3384
Inf:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
1000:1
284 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
1600 nits
379 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
1600 nits
Matte
COATING
Glossy
Although they have very similar scores, PerfectRec considers Apple Pro Display XDR (IPS FALD) to be very good for media consumption, while the AOC AG276QZD (W-OLED) is good.
HDR Gaming and Media Consumption
Yes
Yes
Both the AOC AG276QZD (W-OLED) and Apple Pro Display XDR (IPS FALD) are suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption.
Give feedback
We’re constantly working to improve.
How the AOC AG276QZD (W-OLED) and the Apple Pro Display XDR (IPS FALD) compare to other monitors
Spec Comparison
 |  | |
| AOC AG276QZD (W-OLED) | Apple Pro Display XDR (IPS FALD) |
GENERAL | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Price | |||
$700 | $4,999 | ||
Screen Size | |||
Screen Size | 27" | 32" | |
Resolution | |||
Resolution | 2560 x 1440 | 6016 x 3384 | |
Screen Type | |||
Screen Type | OLED | LED | |
Screen Sub-type | |||
Screen Sub-type | W-OLED | IPS FALD | |
Local Dimming Zones | |||
Local Dimming Zones | N/A | 576 | |
COLOR, CONTRAST & BRIGHTNESS | |||
|---|---|---|---|
Native Contrast | |||
Native Contrast | Inf:1 | 1000:1 | |
SDR Peak Brightness | |||
SDR Peak Brightness | 284 nits | 1600 nits | |
HDR Peak Brightness | |||
HDR Peak Brightness | 379 nits | 1600 nits | |
Suitable for HDR Gaming and Media Consumption | |||
Suitable for HDR Gaming and Media Consumption | Yes | Yes | |
sRGB Color Gamut | |||
sRGB Color Gamut | 100 % | 94.3 % | |
MOTION CHARACTERISTICS | |||
|---|---|---|---|
Total Response Time | |||
Total Response Time | 0.3 ms | 20 ms | |
Variable Refresh Rate | |||
Variable Refresh Rate | 20 - 240 Hz | N/A | |
Strobing / BFI | |||
Strobing / BFI | No | No | |
Persistence Blur Score | |||
Persistence Blur Score | 8/10 | 5/10 | |
Ghosting Score | |||
Ghosting Score | 9.9/10 | 6/10 | |
TEXT & IMAGE CLARITY | |||
|---|---|---|---|
Pixels Per Inch | |||
Pixels Per Inch | 108 PPI | 216 PPI | |
Coating | |||
Coating | Matte | Glossy | |
Text Clarity Score | |||
Text Clarity Score | 6.6/10 | 9.5/10 | |
Image Clarity Score | |||
Image Clarity Score | 7/10 | 9.5/10 | |
PORTS & CONNECTIVITY | |||
|---|---|---|---|
HDMI 1.4 Ports | |||
HDMI 1.4 Ports | 0 | 0 | |
HDMI 2.0 Ports | |||
HDMI 2.0 Ports | 2 | 0 | |
HDMI 2.1 Ports | |||
HDMI 2.1 Ports | 0 | 0 | |
Micro HDMI Ports | |||
Micro HDMI Ports | 0 | 0 | |
DisplayPort 1.2 Ports | |||
DisplayPort 1.2 Ports | 0 | 0 | |
Shopping
Apple Pro Display XDR (IPS FALD)
See more
Dig into reviews and images
PC Mag
Chris Stobing | February 2020
"Apple's Pro Display XDR provides exceptional color accuracy and build quality at a price that's quite competitive with those of reference-grade pro monitors. It's exquisite enough that swallowing the wildly extravagant cost of its Pro Stand is worth it."
Give feedback
We're constantly perfecting our model
More comparisons for you
Compare AOC AG276QZD (W-OLED) vs. Acer X34V (QD-OLED)
VS
Compare AOC AG276QZD (W-OLED) vs. Pixio PX277 OLED Max (W-OLED)
VS
Compare AOC AG276QZD (W-OLED) vs. Nubia RedMagic GM001J (IPS MiniLED)
VS
Compare Apple Pro Display XDR (IPS FALD) vs. Asus PA32DC (Inkjet OLED)
VS
Compare Apple Pro Display XDR (IPS FALD) vs. LG 32EP950 (Inkjet OLED)
VS
Compare Apple Pro Display XDR (IPS FALD) vs. LG 27EP950 (W-OLED)
VS
FAQs
Why trust us
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec monitors team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest monitor information and makes it digestible for you.
By the numbers
210
Monitors evaluated
10,500
Monitors stats compiled
15
Proprietary Monitors ratings developed
116,900
Recommendations made
17,535
Consumer hours saved
About the monitor team
Joe Golden, Ph.D
CEO and Monitors Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.
Jason Lew
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.
Chandradeep Chowdhury
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.
Featured in
