If you're looking for better image quality and more screen real estate for productivity or digital photo editing, the MSI G274QPF-QD with its higher resolution and larger screen would be beneficial. However, if you prefer fast-paced gaming with minimal ghosting, the AOC 24G2SPU offers a slightly better experience in this regard. Both monitors have a high refresh rate and support variable refresh rate, making them suitable for casual gaming. The AOC model's smaller size might make text appear clearer, which can be advantageous for reading or tasks requiring attention to detail. Those interested in print photo editing will find the MSI's wider color gamut and color depth more appealing. Give Feedback
this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the AOC 24G2SPU (IPS)
Very good response time
Advantages of the MSI G274QPF-QD (IPS)
The MSI G274QPF-QD (IPS) has no clear advantages over the AOC 24G2SPU (IPS).
Key differences
Productivity
4.9/10
6.0/10
1920 x 1080
RESOLUTION
2560 x 1440
92 PPI
PIXELS PER INCH
108 PPI
Yes
ADJUSTABLE STAND
Yes
Matte
COATING
Matte
The MSI G274QPF-QD (IPS) is only fair for productivity, while the AOC 24G2SPU (IPS) is poor.
Cost
$140
$270
$50
$100
$150
$200
$250
$300
$350
$400
The AOC 24G2SPU (IPS) has a price of $140 and the MSI G274QPF-QD (IPS) costs $270.
Print Photo Editing
No
Yes
The AOC 24G2SPU (IPS) is not suitable for print photo editing while the MSI G274QPF-QD (IPS) is suitable for print photo editing.
Key similarities
Casual Gaming
5.8/10
5.9/10
1920 x 1080
RESOLUTION
2560 x 1440
165Hz
REFRESH RATE
170Hz
1000:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
1000:1
300 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
300 nits
N/A
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
Unknown
89.0 %
DCI-P3 COLOR GAMUT
95.0 %
Matte
COATING
Matte
The MSI G274QPF-QD (IPS) and AOC 24G2SPU (IPS) are both poor for casual gaming.
Competitive Gaming
5.8/10
5.8/10
165Hz
REFRESH RATE
170Hz
4.0 ms
TOTAL RESPONSE TIME
8.0 ms
48 - 165 Hz
VARIABLE REFRESH RATE
48 - 170 Hz
No
STROBING / BFI
No
300 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
300 nits
The MSI G274QPF-QD (IPS) and AOC 24G2SPU (IPS) are both poor for competitive gaming.
Media Consumption
5.4/10
5.9/10
1920 x 1080
RESOLUTION
2560 x 1440
1000:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
1000:1
300 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
300 nits
N/A
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
Unknown
Matte
COATING
Matte
The MSI G274QPF-QD (IPS) and AOC 24G2SPU (IPS) are both poor for media consumption.
HDR Gaming and Media Consumption
No
No
Both the AOC 24G2SPU (IPS) and MSI G274QPF-QD (IPS) are not suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption.
Digital Photo Editing
Yes
Yes
Both the AOC 24G2SPU (IPS) and MSI G274QPF-QD (IPS) are suitable for digital photo editing.
HDR Video Editing and Color Grading
No
No
Both the AOC 24G2SPU (IPS) and MSI G274QPF-QD (IPS) are not suitable for HDR video editing and color grading.
Give feedback
We’re constantly working to improve.
How the AOC 24G2SPU (IPS) and the MSI G274QPF-QD (IPS) compare to other monitors
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec monitors team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest monitor information and makes it digestible for you.
By the numbers
210
Monitors evaluated
10,500
Monitors stats compiled
15
Proprietary Monitors ratings developed
116,600
Recommendations made
17,490
Consumer hours saved
About the monitor team
Joe Golden, Ph.D
CEO and Monitors Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.
Jason Lew
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.
Chandradeep Chowdhury
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.