A comparison of specs, key information, reviews, and best pricing from top retailers
Last updated -- hours ago | Report incorrect information
24G2SPU
Company ProductName Specs




27EP950
Company ProductName Specs




What we think

Chevron down
PerfectRec Logo
The PerfectRec monitor team Learn more
Updated April 11, 2024·

If you're on a budget and need a monitor mainly for casual gaming or productivity with decent color accuracy for digital photo editing, the AOC 24G2SPU might be the better choice. However, if you're willing to invest in superior image clarity, higher resolution, and a monitor that excels at media consumption and HDR gaming, the LG 27EP950 would be more suitable. Keep in mind, the LG offers a more vivid color experience but isn't tailored for competitive gaming due to its lower refresh rate, while the AOC has a higher refresh rate for smoother gameplay but lesser resolution and color fidelity. Give Feedback

this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the AOC 24G2SPU (IPS)
  • Good refresh rate
Advantages of the LG 27EP950 (W-OLED)
  • Best in class for casual gaming
  • Good for media consumption
  • Very good image clarity
  • Best in class contrast
  • Best in class response time

Key differences

Chevron down

Casual Gaming

5.8
24G2SPU
27EP950
9.5
1920 x 1080
RESOLUTION
3840 x 2160
165Hz
REFRESH RATE
60Hz
1000:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
Inf:1
300 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
250 nits
N/A
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
N/A
89.0 %
DCI-P3 COLOR GAMUT
99.0 %
Matte
COATING
Matte
The LG 27EP950 (W-OLED) is best in class for casual gaming, while the AOC 24G2SPU (IPS) is poor.

Productivity

4.9
24G2SPU
27EP950
6.6
1920 x 1080
RESOLUTION
3840 x 2160
92 PPI
PIXELS PER INCH
163 PPI
Yes
ADJUSTABLE STAND
Yes
Matte
COATING
Matte
The LG 27EP950 (W-OLED) is only fair for productivity, while the AOC 24G2SPU (IPS) is poor.

Media Consumption

5.4
24G2SPU
27EP950
7.9
1920 x 1080
RESOLUTION
3840 x 2160
1000:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
Inf:1
300 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
250 nits
N/A
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
N/A
Matte
COATING
Matte
The LG 27EP950 (W-OLED) is good for media consumption, while the AOC 24G2SPU (IPS) is poor.

Cost

$140
24G2SPU
27EP950
$3,000
Product image
Product image

$0

$1,000

$2,000

$3,000

$4,000

The AOC 24G2SPU (IPS) has a price of $140 and the LG 27EP950 (W-OLED) costs $3,000.

HDR Gaming and Media Consumption

No
24G2SPU
27EP950
Yes
The AOC 24G2SPU (IPS) is not suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption while the LG 27EP950 (W-OLED) is suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption.

Digital Photo Editing

Yes
24G2SPU
27EP950
No
The AOC 24G2SPU (IPS) is suitable for digital photo editing while the LG 27EP950 (W-OLED) is not suitable for digital photo editing.

Key similarities

Chevron down

Competitive Gaming

5.8
24G2SPU
27EP950
5.4
165Hz
REFRESH RATE
60Hz
4.0 ms
TOTAL RESPONSE TIME
1.0 ms
48 - 165 Hz
VARIABLE REFRESH RATE
N/A
No
STROBING / BFI
No
300 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
250 nits
The AOC 24G2SPU (IPS) and LG 27EP950 (W-OLED) are both poor for competitive gaming.

HDR Video Editing and Color Grading

No
24G2SPU
27EP950
No
Both the AOC 24G2SPU (IPS) and LG 27EP950 (W-OLED) are not suitable for HDR video editing and color grading.

Print Photo Editing

No
24G2SPU
27EP950
No
Both the AOC 24G2SPU (IPS) and LG 27EP950 (W-OLED) are not suitable for print photo editing.

Give feedback

We’re constantly working to improve.

How the AOC 24G2SPU (IPS) and the LG 27EP950 (W-OLED) compare to other monitors

Chevron down

Spec Comparison

Chevron down
AOC 24G2SPU (IPS)LG 27EP950 (W-OLED)
AOC 24G2SPU (IPS)LG 27EP950 (W-OLED)

GENERAL

Price
$140
$3,000
Screen Size
24"27"
Resolution
1920 x 10803840 x 2160
Screen Type
LEDOLED
Screen Sub-type
IPSW-OLED
Refresh Rate
165Hz60Hz

COLOR, CONTRAST & BRIGHTNESS

Native Contrast
1000:1Inf:1
SDR Peak Brightness
300 nits250 nits
Suitable for HDR Gaming and Media Consumption
NoYes
sRGB Color Gamut
126 %99 %
Suitable for Digital Photo Editing
YesNo

MOTION CHARACTERISTICS

Total Response Time
4 ms1 ms
Variable Refresh Rate
48 - 165 HzN/A
Strobing / BFI
NoNo
Persistence Blur Score
7.1/105/10
Ghosting Score
8.3/109.6/10

TEXT & IMAGE CLARITY

Pixels Per Inch
92 PPI163 PPI
Coating
MatteMatte
Text Clarity Score
6.2/106.9/10
Image Clarity Score
6.2/108/10

PORTS & CONNECTIVITY

HDMI 1.4 Ports
20
HDMI 2.0 Ports
01
HDMI 2.1 Ports
00
Micro HDMI Ports
00
DisplayPort 1.2 Ports
10

Give feedback

We're constantly perfecting our model

FAQs

Chevron down

Why trust us

Chevron down
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec monitors team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest monitor information and makes it digestible for you.

By the numbers

210
Monitors evaluated
10,500
Monitors stats compiled
15
Proprietary Monitors ratings developed
116,600
Recommendations made
17,490
Consumer hours saved

About the monitor team

Joe Golden, Ph.D

CEO and Monitors Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.

Jason Lew

Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.

Chandradeep Chowdhury

Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.

Featured in

Color LTT LogoGeekwire logo9to5 Mac logoPhone Arena LogoColor Daring Fireball logo