For casual gaming on a budget, the AOC monitor is suitable with a high refresh rate and good gaming performance. However, its smaller size and lower resolution limit productivity and media enjoyment. The Innocn monitor, while pricier, gives you a larger, crisper display with higher resolution and excellent color accuracy, making it ideal for productivity tasks and media consumption, including HDR content. It also has better overall image quality, which is important if you're into digital photo editing or consuming HDR videos. If competitive gaming is also on your radar, though, the AOC's higher refresh rate might be more appealing despite less visual fidelity. Choose the AOC for budget-friendly, responsive gaming or the Innocn for superior image quality and multi-use capabilities at a higher cost. Give Feedback
this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the AOC 24G2SPU (IPS)
Good refresh rate
Very good response time
Advantages of the Innocn 32M2V (IPS MiniLED)
Good for casual gaming
Best in class for productivity
Good for media consumption
Good text clarity
Good image clarity
Good contrast
Good brightness
Very good color volume
Key differences
Casual Gaming
5.8/10
7.6/10
1920 x 1080
RESOLUTION
3840 x 2160
165Hz
REFRESH RATE
144Hz
1000:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
1000:1
300 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
600 nits
N/A
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
1200 nits
89.0 %
DCI-P3 COLOR GAMUT
99.0 %
Matte
COATING
Matte
The Innocn 32M2V (IPS MiniLED) is good for casual gaming, while the AOC 24G2SPU (IPS) is poor.
Competitive Gaming
5.8/10
4.6/10
165Hz
REFRESH RATE
144Hz
4.0 ms
TOTAL RESPONSE TIME
8.3 ms
48 - 165 Hz
VARIABLE REFRESH RATE
48 - 144 Hz
No
STROBING / BFI
No
300 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
600 nits
The AOC 24G2SPU (IPS) and Innocn 32M2V (IPS MiniLED) are both poor for competitive gaming, though the AOC 24G2SPU (IPS) is somewhat better.
Productivity
4.9/10
9.7/10
1920 x 1080
RESOLUTION
3840 x 2160
92 PPI
PIXELS PER INCH
139 PPI
Yes
ADJUSTABLE STAND
Yes
Matte
COATING
Matte
The Innocn 32M2V (IPS MiniLED) is best in class for productivity, while the AOC 24G2SPU (IPS) is poor.
Media Consumption
5.4/10
7.8/10
1920 x 1080
RESOLUTION
3840 x 2160
1000:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
1000:1
300 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
600 nits
N/A
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
1200 nits
Matte
COATING
Matte
The Innocn 32M2V (IPS MiniLED) is good for media consumption, while the AOC 24G2SPU (IPS) is poor.
Cost
$140
$800
$0
$200
$400
$600
$800
$1,000
$1,200
The AOC 24G2SPU (IPS) has a price of $140 and the Innocn 32M2V (IPS MiniLED) costs $800.
HDR Gaming and Media Consumption
No
Yes
The AOC 24G2SPU (IPS) is not suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption while the Innocn 32M2V (IPS MiniLED) is suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption.
Print Photo Editing
No
Yes
The AOC 24G2SPU (IPS) is not suitable for print photo editing while the Innocn 32M2V (IPS MiniLED) is suitable for print photo editing.
Key similarities
Digital Photo Editing
Yes
Yes
Both the AOC 24G2SPU (IPS) and Innocn 32M2V (IPS MiniLED) are suitable for digital photo editing.
HDR Video Editing and Color Grading
No
No
Both the AOC 24G2SPU (IPS) and Innocn 32M2V (IPS MiniLED) are not suitable for HDR video editing and color grading.
Give feedback
We’re constantly working to improve.
How the AOC 24G2SPU (IPS) and the Innocn 32M2V (IPS MiniLED) compare to other monitors
"Whlie not perfect, the Innocn 32M2V is an excellent HDR gaming monitor if you want a 32″ 4K high refresh rate display – just make sure you’re familiar with all its flaws. If you’ve been waiting for a 32″ 4K high refresh rate gaming monitor with proper HDR support, the Innocn 32M2V is the first model available at a reasonable price."
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec monitors team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest monitor information and makes it digestible for you.
By the numbers
210
Monitors evaluated
10,500
Monitors stats compiled
15
Proprietary Monitors ratings developed
116,600
Recommendations made
17,490
Consumer hours saved
About the monitor team
Joe Golden, Ph.D
CEO and Monitors Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.
Jason Lew
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.
Chandradeep Chowdhury
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.