If you are on a budget and primarily interested in casual or competitive gaming, the AOC 24G2SPU offers a high refresh rate and quick response time, making it a solid choice for smooth gameplay. The smaller screen and lower resolution mean it's less ideal for productivity and media consumption. Conversely, the CoolerMaster GP27U will cost you more but provides superior image quality with high resolution, better color accuracy, and is great for HDR gaming and media consumption. It also offers a larger screen, making it better suited for productivity tasks and immersive experiences. If print photo editing or HDR video editing are priorities, the CoolerMaster GP27U is the better choice, while the AOC 24G2SPU is more tailored towards those who favor gaming performance and are looking to save money. Give Feedback
this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the AOC 24G2SPU (IPS)
The AOC 24G2SPU (IPS) has no clear advantages over the CoolerMaster GP27U (IPS MiniLED).
Advantages of the CoolerMaster GP27U (IPS MiniLED)
Very good for casual gaming
Best in class for productivity
Very good for media consumption
Very good text clarity
Very good image clarity
Very good contrast
Very good brightness
Very good color volume
Key differences
Casual Gaming
5.8/10
8.0/10
1920 x 1080
RESOLUTION
3840 x 2160
165Hz
REFRESH RATE
160Hz
1000:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
1072:1
300 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
697 nits
N/A
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
1550 nits
89.0 %
DCI-P3 COLOR GAMUT
N/A
Matte
COATING
Matte
The CoolerMaster GP27U (IPS MiniLED) is very good for casual gaming, while the AOC 24G2SPU (IPS) is poor.
Productivity
4.9/10
9.8/10
1920 x 1080
RESOLUTION
3840 x 2160
92 PPI
PIXELS PER INCH
163 PPI
Yes
ADJUSTABLE STAND
Yes
Matte
COATING
Matte
The CoolerMaster GP27U (IPS MiniLED) is best in class for productivity, while the AOC 24G2SPU (IPS) is poor.
Media Consumption
5.4/10
8.0/10
1920 x 1080
RESOLUTION
3840 x 2160
1000:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
1072:1
300 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
697 nits
N/A
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
1550 nits
Matte
COATING
Matte
The CoolerMaster GP27U (IPS MiniLED) is very good for media consumption, while the AOC 24G2SPU (IPS) is poor.
Cost
$140
$770
$0
$200
$400
$600
$800
$1,000
$1,200
The AOC 24G2SPU (IPS) has a price of $140 and the CoolerMaster GP27U (IPS MiniLED) costs $770.
HDR Gaming and Media Consumption
No
Yes
The AOC 24G2SPU (IPS) is not suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption while the CoolerMaster GP27U (IPS MiniLED) is suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption.
Digital Photo Editing
Yes
No
The AOC 24G2SPU (IPS) is suitable for digital photo editing while the CoolerMaster GP27U (IPS MiniLED) is not suitable for digital photo editing.
Print Photo Editing
No
Yes
The AOC 24G2SPU (IPS) is not suitable for print photo editing while the CoolerMaster GP27U (IPS MiniLED) is suitable for print photo editing.
Key similarities
Competitive Gaming
5.8/10
5.9/10
165Hz
REFRESH RATE
160Hz
4.0 ms
TOTAL RESPONSE TIME
6.2 ms
48 - 165 Hz
VARIABLE REFRESH RATE
20 - 160 Hz
No
STROBING / BFI
No
300 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
697 nits
The CoolerMaster GP27U (IPS MiniLED) and AOC 24G2SPU (IPS) are both poor for competitive gaming.
HDR Video Editing and Color Grading
No
No
Both the AOC 24G2SPU (IPS) and CoolerMaster GP27U (IPS MiniLED) are not suitable for HDR video editing and color grading.
Give feedback
We’re constantly working to improve.
How the AOC 24G2SPU (IPS) and the CoolerMaster GP27U (IPS MiniLED) compare to other monitors
"The Cooler Master Tempest GP27U leaves little to complain about. It delivers a stunning picture with high contrast, brightness, and vivid color. Professional-grade video processing means a superlative gaming experience. And it’s a little less expensive than the competition."
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec monitors team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest monitor information and makes it digestible for you.
By the numbers
210
Monitors evaluated
10,500
Monitors stats compiled
15
Proprietary Monitors ratings developed
116,600
Recommendations made
17,490
Consumer hours saved
About the monitor team
Joe Golden, Ph.D
CEO and Monitors Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.
Jason Lew
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.
Chandradeep Chowdhury
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.