A comparison of specs, key information, reviews, and best pricing from top retailers
Last updated -- hours ago | Report incorrect information
Company ProductName Specs
Company ProductName Specs
What we think
The PerfectRec monitor team Learn more
Updated April 11, 2024·
If cost is a significant factor and you're looking for a monitor that provides a decent gaming experience on a budget, the AOC 24G2SPU could serve you well for casual gaming and general productivity. However, if you're a competitive gamer seeking higher performance, better image clarity, and don't mind investing more, the Asus PG279QM would offer smoother gameplay due to its higher refresh rate and would also be superior for tasks requiring color accuracy, such as digital photo editing. Neither monitor is particularly suited for HDR gaming or HDR video editing, so if those are priorities, you might want to consider other options. Give Feedback
this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the AOC 24G2SPU (IPS)
- Very good response time
Advantages of the Asus PG279QM (IPS)
- Very good for competitive gaming
- Very good refresh rate
- Good text clarity
- Good image clarity
Key differences
Casual Gaming
5.8
6.4
1920 x 1080
RESOLUTION
2560 x 1440
165Hz
REFRESH RATE
240Hz
1000:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
1147:1
300 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
363 nits
N/A
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
478 nits
89.0 %
DCI-P3 COLOR GAMUT
95.8 %
Matte
COATING
Matte
The Asus PG279QM (IPS) is only fair for casual gaming, while the AOC 24G2SPU (IPS) is poor.
Competitive Gaming
5.8
8.0
165Hz
REFRESH RATE
240Hz
4.0 ms
TOTAL RESPONSE TIME
7.0 ms
48 - 165 Hz
VARIABLE REFRESH RATE
20 - 240 Hz
No
STROBING / BFI
No
300 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
363 nits
The Asus PG279QM (IPS) is very good for competitive gaming, while the AOC 24G2SPU (IPS) is poor.
Productivity
4.9
6.4
1920 x 1080
RESOLUTION
2560 x 1440
92 PPI
PIXELS PER INCH
109 PPI
Yes
ADJUSTABLE STAND
Yes
Matte
COATING
Matte
The Asus PG279QM (IPS) is only fair for productivity, while the AOC 24G2SPU (IPS) is poor.
Media Consumption
5.4
6.0
1920 x 1080
RESOLUTION
2560 x 1440
1000:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
1147:1
300 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
363 nits
N/A
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
478 nits
Matte
COATING
Matte
The Asus PG279QM (IPS) is only fair for media consumption, while the AOC 24G2SPU (IPS) is poor.
Cost
$140
$749
$0
$200
$400
$600
$800
$1,000
$1,200
The AOC 24G2SPU (IPS) has a price of $140 and the Asus PG279QM (IPS) costs $749.
Print Photo Editing
No
Yes
The AOC 24G2SPU (IPS) is not suitable for print photo editing while the Asus PG279QM (IPS) is suitable for print photo editing.
Key similarities
HDR Gaming and Media Consumption
No
No
Both the AOC 24G2SPU (IPS) and Asus PG279QM (IPS) are not suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption.
Digital Photo Editing
Yes
Yes
Both the AOC 24G2SPU (IPS) and Asus PG279QM (IPS) are suitable for digital photo editing.
HDR Video Editing and Color Grading
No
No
Both the AOC 24G2SPU (IPS) and Asus PG279QM (IPS) are not suitable for HDR video editing and color grading.
Give feedback
We’re constantly working to improve.
How the AOC 24G2SPU (IPS) and the Asus PG279QM (IPS) compare to other monitors
Spec Comparison
 |  | |
| AOC 24G2SPU (IPS) | Asus PG279QM (IPS) |
GENERAL | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Price | |||
$140 | $749 | ||
Screen Size | |||
Screen Size | 24" | 27" | |
Resolution | |||
Resolution | 1920 x 1080 | 2560 x 1440 | |
Screen Type | |||
Screen Type | LED | LED | |
Screen Sub-type | |||
Screen Sub-type | IPS | IPS | |
Local Dimming Zones | |||
Local Dimming Zones | N/A | 32 | |
COLOR, CONTRAST & BRIGHTNESS | |||
|---|---|---|---|
Native Contrast | |||
Native Contrast | 1000:1 | 1147:1 | |
SDR Peak Brightness | |||
SDR Peak Brightness | 300 nits | 363 nits | |
HDR Peak Brightness | |||
HDR Peak Brightness | N/A | 478 nits | |
Suitable for HDR Gaming and Media Consumption | |||
Suitable for HDR Gaming and Media Consumption | No | No | |
sRGB Color Gamut | |||
sRGB Color Gamut | 126 % | 103.1 % | |
MOTION CHARACTERISTICS | |||
|---|---|---|---|
Total Response Time | |||
Total Response Time | 4 ms | 7 ms | |
Variable Refresh Rate | |||
Variable Refresh Rate | 48 - 165 Hz | 20 - 240 Hz | |
Strobing / BFI | |||
Strobing / BFI | No | No | |
Persistence Blur Score | |||
Persistence Blur Score | 7.1/10 | 8/10 | |
Ghosting Score | |||
Ghosting Score | 8.3/10 | 8/10 | |
TEXT & IMAGE CLARITY | |||
|---|---|---|---|
Pixels Per Inch | |||
Pixels Per Inch | 92 PPI | 109 PPI | |
Coating | |||
Coating | Matte | Matte | |
Text Clarity Score | |||
Text Clarity Score | 6.2/10 | 7/10 | |
Image Clarity Score | |||
Image Clarity Score | 6.2/10 | 7/10 | |
PORTS & CONNECTIVITY | |||
|---|---|---|---|
HDMI 1.4 Ports | |||
HDMI 1.4 Ports | 2 | 0 | |
HDMI 2.0 Ports | |||
HDMI 2.0 Ports | 0 | 3 | |
HDMI 2.1 Ports | |||
HDMI 2.1 Ports | 0 | 0 | |
Micro HDMI Ports | |||
Micro HDMI Ports | 0 | 0 | |
DisplayPort 1.2 Ports | |||
DisplayPort 1.2 Ports | 1 | 0 | |
Shopping
Asus PG279QM (IPS)
See more
Dig into reviews and images
Tom's Hardware
Christian Eberle | April 2022
"The Asus ROG Swift PG279QM is one of the best gaming monitors I’ve reviewed, and one of the best all-around displays too. With perfect video processing, smooth gaming performance and tons of rich and accurate color."
Give feedback
We're constantly perfecting our model
More comparisons for you
Compare AOC 24G2SPU (IPS) vs. Gigabyte G24F-2 (IPS)
VS
Compare AOC 24G2SPU (IPS) vs. Lenovo G24-20 (IPS)
VS
Compare AOC 24G2SPU (IPS) vs. KTC H27T22 (IPS)
VS
Compare Asus PG279QM (IPS) vs. Dell Alienware AW3821DW (IPS)
VS
Compare Asus PG279QM (IPS) vs. LG 34GP83A (IPS)
VS
Compare Asus PG279QM (IPS) vs. LG 34GN850B (IPS)
VS
FAQs
Why trust us
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec monitors team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest monitor information and makes it digestible for you.
By the numbers
210
Monitors evaluated
10,500
Monitors stats compiled
15
Proprietary Monitors ratings developed
107,300
Recommendations made
16,095
Consumer hours saved
About the monitor team
Joe Golden, Ph.D
CEO and Monitors Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.
Jason Lew
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.
Chandradeep Chowdhury
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.
Featured in
