If you're looking for a monitor that excels in casual gaming and general productivity at a midrange price, the AOC 24G2SPU is a solid choice. It offers a good refresh rate and is suitable for digital photo editing. However, it's not the best option for competitive gaming, HDR gaming, or media consumption, and its image clarity and color performance are adequate but not exceptional. On the other hand, the Asus PA32UCG-K, while at a premium price, provides excellent image quality, is suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption, and its high color accuracy makes it fantastic for digital and print photo editing. It's also better suited for productivity with its larger screen and higher resolution. This monitor is ideal if you're seeking top-notch performance and are willing to invest more. Give Feedback
this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the AOC 24G2SPU (IPS)
Good refresh rate
Very good response time
Advantages of the Asus PA32UCG-K (IPS MiniLED)
Very good for casual gaming
Best in class for productivity
Very good for media consumption
Good text clarity
Good image clarity
Good contrast
Best in class brightness
Very good color volume
Key differences
Casual Gaming
5.8/10
8.3/10
1920 x 1080
RESOLUTION
3840 x 2160
165Hz
REFRESH RATE
120Hz
1000:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
1000:1
300 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
1000 nits
N/A
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
1000 nits
89.0 %
DCI-P3 COLOR GAMUT
98.0 %
Matte
COATING
Matte
The Asus PA32UCG-K (IPS MiniLED) is very good for casual gaming, while the AOC 24G2SPU (IPS) is poor.
Competitive Gaming
5.8/10
4.4/10
165Hz
REFRESH RATE
120Hz
4.0 ms
TOTAL RESPONSE TIME
10.0 ms
48 - 165 Hz
VARIABLE REFRESH RATE
48 - 120 Hz
No
STROBING / BFI
No
300 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
1000 nits
The AOC 24G2SPU (IPS) and Asus PA32UCG-K (IPS MiniLED) are both poor for competitive gaming, though the AOC 24G2SPU (IPS) is somewhat better.
Productivity
4.9/10
9.8/10
1920 x 1080
RESOLUTION
3840 x 2160
92 PPI
PIXELS PER INCH
137 PPI
Yes
ADJUSTABLE STAND
Yes
Matte
COATING
Matte
The Asus PA32UCG-K (IPS MiniLED) is best in class for productivity, while the AOC 24G2SPU (IPS) is poor.
Media Consumption
5.4/10
8.8/10
1920 x 1080
RESOLUTION
3840 x 2160
1000:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
1000:1
300 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
1000 nits
N/A
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
1000 nits
Matte
COATING
Matte
The Asus PA32UCG-K (IPS MiniLED) is very good for media consumption, while the AOC 24G2SPU (IPS) is poor.
Cost
$140
$2,999
$0
$1,000
$2,000
$3,000
$4,000
The AOC 24G2SPU (IPS) has a price of $140 and the Asus PA32UCG-K (IPS MiniLED) costs $2,999.
HDR Gaming and Media Consumption
No
Yes
The AOC 24G2SPU (IPS) is not suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption while the Asus PA32UCG-K (IPS MiniLED) is suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption.
HDR Video Editing and Color Grading
No
Yes
The AOC 24G2SPU (IPS) is not suitable for HDR video editing and color grading while the Asus PA32UCG-K (IPS MiniLED) is suitable for HDR video editing and color grading.
Print Photo Editing
No
Yes
The AOC 24G2SPU (IPS) is not suitable for print photo editing while the Asus PA32UCG-K (IPS MiniLED) is suitable for print photo editing.
Key similarities
Digital Photo Editing
Yes
Yes
Both the AOC 24G2SPU (IPS) and Asus PA32UCG-K (IPS MiniLED) are suitable for digital photo editing.
Give feedback
We’re constantly working to improve.
How the AOC 24G2SPU (IPS) and the Asus PA32UCG-K (IPS MiniLED) compare to other monitors
"Combining features that designers and content makers need, the Asus ProArt PA32UCG-K Display represents the true cost of accurate colour. It’s expensive, heavy and has weird OSD controls, but the screen is glorious when working with HDR video or game graphics."
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec monitors team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest monitor information and makes it digestible for you.
By the numbers
210
Monitors evaluated
10,500
Monitors stats compiled
15
Proprietary Monitors ratings developed
116,600
Recommendations made
17,490
Consumer hours saved
About the monitor team
Joe Golden, Ph.D
CEO and Monitors Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.
Jason Lew
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.
Chandradeep Chowdhury
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.