A comparison of specs, key information, reviews, and best pricing from top retailers
Last updated -- hours ago | Report incorrect information
XB323U-GX
Company ProductName Specs




38WN95C
Company ProductName Specs




What we think

Chevron down
PerfectRec Logo
The PerfectRec monitor team Learn more
Updated April 11, 2024·

If competitive gaming is your priority, the Acer XB323U-GX, with its higher refresh rate and quicker response time, offers a smoother experience that might be preferable. However, if you're looking for a wider and larger screen for an immersive experience in productivity and media consumption, the LG 38WN95C with its unique aspect ratio and larger screen size could serve you better. Both monitors have good color accuracy suitable for digital photo editing; the main differences are in shape and performance in gaming scenarios. Give Feedback

this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the Acer XB323U-GX (IPS)
  • Very good refresh rate
Advantages of the LG 38WN95C (IPS)
  • Good text clarity
  • Good image clarity

Key differences

Chevron down

Competitive Gaming

5.3
XB323U-GX
38WN95C
4.5
270Hz
REFRESH RATE
144Hz
8.0 ms
TOTAL RESPONSE TIME
7.1 ms
48 - 270 Hz
VARIABLE REFRESH RATE
20 - 144 Hz
Yes
STROBING / BFI
No
400 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
477 nits
The Acer XB323U-GX (IPS) and LG 38WN95C (IPS) are both poor for competitive gaming, though the Acer XB323U-GX (IPS) is somewhat better.

Productivity

4.8
XB323U-GX
38WN95C
6.6
2560 x 1440
RESOLUTION
3840 x 1600
91 PPI
PIXELS PER INCH
111 PPI
Yes
ADJUSTABLE STAND
Yes
Matte
COATING
Matte
The LG 38WN95C (IPS) is only fair for productivity, while the Acer XB323U-GX (IPS) is poor.

Media Consumption

5.4
XB323U-GX
38WN95C
6.2
2560 x 1440
RESOLUTION
3840 x 1600
1000:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
898:1
400 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
477 nits
600 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
692 nits
Matte
COATING
Matte
The LG 38WN95C (IPS) is only fair for media consumption, while the Acer XB323U-GX (IPS) is poor.

Cost

$1,147
XB323U-GX
38WN95C
$950
Product image
Product image

$400

$600

$800

$1,000

$1,200

$1,400

$1,600

$1,800

The Acer XB323U-GX (IPS) has a price of $1,147 and the LG 38WN95C (IPS) costs $950.

Print Photo Editing

Yes
XB323U-GX
38WN95C
No
The Acer XB323U-GX (IPS) is suitable for print photo editing while the LG 38WN95C (IPS) is not suitable for print photo editing.

Key similarities

Chevron down

Casual Gaming

5.9
XB323U-GX
38WN95C
6.1
2560 x 1440
RESOLUTION
3840 x 1600
270Hz
REFRESH RATE
144Hz
1000:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
898:1
400 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
477 nits
600 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
692 nits
95.0 %
DCI-P3 COLOR GAMUT
94.1 %
Matte
COATING
Matte
Although they have very similar scores, PerfectRec considers LG 38WN95C (IPS) to be only fair for casual gaming, while the Acer XB323U-GX (IPS) is poor.

HDR Gaming and Media Consumption

No
XB323U-GX
38WN95C
No
Both the Acer XB323U-GX (IPS) and LG 38WN95C (IPS) are not suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption.

Digital Photo Editing

Yes
XB323U-GX
38WN95C
Yes
Both the Acer XB323U-GX (IPS) and LG 38WN95C (IPS) are suitable for digital photo editing.

HDR Video Editing and Color Grading

No
XB323U-GX
38WN95C
No
Both the Acer XB323U-GX (IPS) and LG 38WN95C (IPS) are not suitable for HDR video editing and color grading.

Give feedback

We’re constantly working to improve.

How the Acer XB323U-GX (IPS) and the LG 38WN95C (IPS) compare to other monitors

Chevron down

Spec Comparison

Chevron down
Acer XB323U-GX (IPS)LG 38WN95C (IPS)
Acer XB323U-GX (IPS)LG 38WN95C (IPS)

GENERAL

Price
$1,147
$950
Screen Size
32"38"
Resolution
2560 x 14403840 x 1600
Screen Type
LEDLED
Screen Sub-type
IPSIPS
Local Dimming Zones
164

COLOR, CONTRAST & BRIGHTNESS

Native Contrast
1000:1898:1
SDR Peak Brightness
400 nits477 nits
HDR Peak Brightness
600 nits692 nits
Suitable for HDR Gaming and Media Consumption
NoNo
sRGB Color Gamut
173.4 %100 %

MOTION CHARACTERISTICS

Total Response Time
8 ms7.1 ms
Variable Refresh Rate
48 - 270 Hz20 - 144 Hz
Strobing / BFI
YesNo
Persistence Blur Score
8.5/106.6/10
Ghosting Score
7.6/107.9/10

TEXT & IMAGE CLARITY

Pixels Per Inch
91 PPI111 PPI
Coating
MatteMatte
Text Clarity Score
6.1/107.2/10
Image Clarity Score
6.1/107.2/10

PORTS & CONNECTIVITY

HDMI 1.4 Ports
00
HDMI 2.0 Ports
12
HDMI 2.1 Ports
00
Micro HDMI Ports
00
DisplayPort 1.2 Ports
10

Give feedback

We're constantly perfecting our model

FAQs

Chevron down

Why trust us

Chevron down
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec monitors team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest monitor information and makes it digestible for you.

By the numbers

210
Monitors evaluated
10,500
Monitors stats compiled
15
Proprietary Monitors ratings developed
107,300
Recommendations made
16,095
Consumer hours saved

About the monitor team

Joe Golden, Ph.D

CEO and Monitors Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.

Jason Lew

Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.

Chandradeep Chowdhury

Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.

Featured in

Color LTT LogoGeekwire logo9to5 Mac logoPhone Arena LogoColor Daring Fireball logo