A comparison of specs, key information, reviews, and best pricing from top retailers
Last updated -- hours ago | Report incorrect information
XB323U-GX
Company ProductName Specs




32GQ850
Company ProductName Specs




What we think

Chevron down
PerfectRec Logo
The PerfectRec monitor team Learn more
Updated April 11, 2024·

If excellent color accuracy for photo editing is a priority and you are willing to invest more, the Acer XB323U-GX would be a strong choice as it offers a wider color gamut and better suitability for print photo editing. On the other hand, if you're focused on gaming or general media consumption and prefer to save money, the LG 32GQ850, while less suited for professional photo editing, still provides a high refresh rate and good performance for casual and competitive gaming with a slightly better response time, reducing motion blur. Both monitors have similar screen size, resolution, and high refresh rates, making them versatile for various tasks, but the Acer has a slight edge in color performance if cost isn't a barrier. Give Feedback

this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the Acer XB323U-GX (IPS)
  • Good brightness
Advantages of the LG 32GQ850 (IPS)
  • The LG 32GQ850 (IPS) has no clear advantages over the Acer XB323U-GX (IPS).

Key differences

Chevron down

Cost

$1,147
XB323U-GX
32GQ850
$718
Product image
Product image

$0

$500

$1,000

$1,500

$2,000

The Acer XB323U-GX (IPS) has a price of $1,147 and the LG 32GQ850 (IPS) costs $718.

Key similarities

Chevron down

Casual Gaming

5.9
XB323U-GX
32GQ850
5.8
2560 x 1440
RESOLUTION
2560 x 1440
270Hz
REFRESH RATE
260Hz
1000:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
1000:1
400 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
150 nits
600 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
600 nits
95.0 %
DCI-P3 COLOR GAMUT
98.0 %
Matte
COATING
Matte
The Acer XB323U-GX (IPS) and LG 32GQ850 (IPS) are both poor for casual gaming.

Competitive Gaming

5.3
XB323U-GX
32GQ850
5.2
270Hz
REFRESH RATE
260Hz
8.0 ms
TOTAL RESPONSE TIME
8.0 ms
48 - 270 Hz
VARIABLE REFRESH RATE
48 - 260 Hz
Yes
STROBING / BFI
No
400 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
150 nits
The Acer XB323U-GX (IPS) and LG 32GQ850 (IPS) are both poor for competitive gaming.

Productivity

4.8
XB323U-GX
32GQ850
5.0
2560 x 1440
RESOLUTION
2560 x 1440
91 PPI
PIXELS PER INCH
93 PPI
Yes
ADJUSTABLE STAND
Yes
Matte
COATING
Matte
The LG 32GQ850 (IPS) and Acer XB323U-GX (IPS) are both poor for productivity.

Media Consumption

5.4
XB323U-GX
32GQ850
5.3
2560 x 1440
RESOLUTION
2560 x 1440
1000:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
1000:1
400 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
150 nits
600 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
600 nits
Matte
COATING
Matte
The Acer XB323U-GX (IPS) and LG 32GQ850 (IPS) are both poor for media consumption.

HDR Gaming and Media Consumption

No
XB323U-GX
32GQ850
No
Both the Acer XB323U-GX (IPS) and LG 32GQ850 (IPS) are not suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption.

Digital Photo Editing

Yes
XB323U-GX
32GQ850
Yes
Both the Acer XB323U-GX (IPS) and LG 32GQ850 (IPS) are suitable for digital photo editing.

HDR Video Editing and Color Grading

No
XB323U-GX
32GQ850
No
Both the Acer XB323U-GX (IPS) and LG 32GQ850 (IPS) are not suitable for HDR video editing and color grading.

Print Photo Editing

Yes
XB323U-GX
32GQ850
Yes
Both the Acer XB323U-GX (IPS) and LG 32GQ850 (IPS) are suitable for print photo editing.

Give feedback

We’re constantly working to improve.

How the Acer XB323U-GX (IPS) and the LG 32GQ850 (IPS) compare to other monitors

Chevron down

Spec Comparison

Chevron down
Acer XB323U-GX (IPS)LG 32GQ850 (IPS)
Acer XB323U-GX (IPS)LG 32GQ850 (IPS)

GENERAL

Price
$1,147
$718
Screen Size
32"32"
Resolution
2560 x 14402560 x 1440
Screen Type
LEDLED
Screen Sub-type
IPSIPS
Local Dimming Zones
1616

COLOR, CONTRAST & BRIGHTNESS

Native Contrast
1000:11000:1
SDR Peak Brightness
400 nits150 nits
HDR Peak Brightness
600 nits600 nits
Suitable for HDR Gaming and Media Consumption
NoNo
sRGB Color Gamut
173.4 %135 %

MOTION CHARACTERISTICS

Total Response Time
8 ms8 ms
Variable Refresh Rate
48 - 270 Hz48 - 260 Hz
Strobing / BFI
YesNo
Persistence Blur Score
8.5/108.3/10
Ghosting Score
7.6/107.6/10

TEXT & IMAGE CLARITY

Pixels Per Inch
91 PPI93 PPI
Coating
MatteMatte
Text Clarity Score
6.1/106.3/10
Image Clarity Score
6.1/106.3/10

PORTS & CONNECTIVITY

HDMI 1.4 Ports
00
HDMI 2.0 Ports
10
HDMI 2.1 Ports
01
Micro HDMI Ports
00
DisplayPort 1.2 Ports
10

Give feedback

We're constantly perfecting our model

FAQs

Chevron down

Why trust us

Chevron down
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec monitors team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest monitor information and makes it digestible for you.

By the numbers

210
Monitors evaluated
10,500
Monitors stats compiled
15
Proprietary Monitors ratings developed
107,300
Recommendations made
16,095
Consumer hours saved

About the monitor team

Joe Golden, Ph.D

CEO and Monitors Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.

Jason Lew

Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.

Chandradeep Chowdhury

Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.

Featured in

Color LTT LogoGeekwire logo9to5 Mac logoPhone Arena LogoColor Daring Fireball logo