If excellent color accuracy for photo editing is a priority and you are willing to invest more, the Acer XB323U-GX would be a strong choice as it offers a wider color gamut and better suitability for print photo editing. On the other hand, if you're focused on gaming or general media consumption and prefer to save money, the LG 32GQ850, while less suited for professional photo editing, still provides a high refresh rate and good performance for casual and competitive gaming with a slightly better response time, reducing motion blur. Both monitors have similar screen size, resolution, and high refresh rates, making them versatile for various tasks, but the Acer has a slight edge in color performance if cost isn't a barrier. Give Feedback
this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the Acer XB323U-GX (IPS)
Good brightness
Advantages of the LG 32GQ850 (IPS)
The LG 32GQ850 (IPS) has no clear advantages over the Acer XB323U-GX (IPS).
Key differences
Cost
$1,147
$718
$0
$500
$1,000
$1,500
$2,000
The Acer XB323U-GX (IPS) has a price of $1,147 and the LG 32GQ850 (IPS) costs $718.
Key similarities
Casual Gaming
5.9/10
5.8/10
2560 x 1440
RESOLUTION
2560 x 1440
270Hz
REFRESH RATE
260Hz
1000:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
1000:1
400 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
150 nits
600 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
600 nits
95.0 %
DCI-P3 COLOR GAMUT
98.0 %
Matte
COATING
Matte
The Acer XB323U-GX (IPS) and LG 32GQ850 (IPS) are both poor for casual gaming.
Competitive Gaming
5.3/10
5.2/10
270Hz
REFRESH RATE
260Hz
8.0 ms
TOTAL RESPONSE TIME
8.0 ms
48 - 270 Hz
VARIABLE REFRESH RATE
48 - 260 Hz
Yes
STROBING / BFI
No
400 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
150 nits
The Acer XB323U-GX (IPS) and LG 32GQ850 (IPS) are both poor for competitive gaming.
Productivity
4.8/10
5.0/10
2560 x 1440
RESOLUTION
2560 x 1440
91 PPI
PIXELS PER INCH
93 PPI
Yes
ADJUSTABLE STAND
Yes
Matte
COATING
Matte
The LG 32GQ850 (IPS) and Acer XB323U-GX (IPS) are both poor for productivity.
Media Consumption
5.4/10
5.3/10
2560 x 1440
RESOLUTION
2560 x 1440
1000:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
1000:1
400 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
150 nits
600 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
600 nits
Matte
COATING
Matte
The Acer XB323U-GX (IPS) and LG 32GQ850 (IPS) are both poor for media consumption.
HDR Gaming and Media Consumption
No
No
Both the Acer XB323U-GX (IPS) and LG 32GQ850 (IPS) are not suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption.
Digital Photo Editing
Yes
Yes
Both the Acer XB323U-GX (IPS) and LG 32GQ850 (IPS) are suitable for digital photo editing.
HDR Video Editing and Color Grading
No
No
Both the Acer XB323U-GX (IPS) and LG 32GQ850 (IPS) are not suitable for HDR video editing and color grading.
Print Photo Editing
Yes
Yes
Both the Acer XB323U-GX (IPS) and LG 32GQ850 (IPS) are suitable for print photo editing.
Give feedback
We’re constantly working to improve.
How the Acer XB323U-GX (IPS) and the LG 32GQ850 (IPS) compare to other monitors
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec monitors team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest monitor information and makes it digestible for you.
By the numbers
210
Monitors evaluated
10,500
Monitors stats compiled
15
Proprietary Monitors ratings developed
116,600
Recommendations made
17,490
Consumer hours saved
About the monitor team
Joe Golden, Ph.D
CEO and Monitors Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.
Jason Lew
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.
Chandradeep Chowdhury
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.