If you are looking for a monitor that enhances competitive gaming with higher refresh rates and responsiveness, the Acer XB323U-GX might be a better fit, despite its higher price tag. However, the LG 32GP850 offers a more budget-friendly option for casual gaming and general productivity, with good performance at a significantly lower cost. Both monitors have similar screen sizes, resolutions, and color performance for digital photo editing, but for high-level HDR gaming and video editing, neither monitor is ideally suited. It comes down to prioritizing competitive gaming features and being willing to invest more, or opting for a more affordable all-around performer. Give Feedback
this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the Acer XB323U-GX (IPS)
Very good refresh rate
Advantages of the LG 32GP850 (IPS)
Very good response time
Key differences
Competitive Gaming
5.3/10
4.8/10
270Hz
REFRESH RATE
180Hz
8.0 ms
TOTAL RESPONSE TIME
6.2 ms
48 - 270 Hz
VARIABLE REFRESH RATE
20 - 180 Hz
Yes
STROBING / BFI
Yes
400 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
412 nits
The Acer XB323U-GX (IPS) and LG 32GP850 (IPS) are both poor for competitive gaming, though the Acer XB323U-GX (IPS) is somewhat better.
Cost
$1,147
$600
$0
$500
$1,000
$1,500
$2,000
The Acer XB323U-GX (IPS) has a price of $1,147 and the LG 32GP850 (IPS) costs $600.
Print Photo Editing
Yes
No
The Acer XB323U-GX (IPS) is suitable for print photo editing while the LG 32GP850 (IPS) is not suitable for print photo editing.
Key similarities
Casual Gaming
5.9/10
5.8/10
2560 x 1440
RESOLUTION
2560 x 1440
270Hz
REFRESH RATE
180Hz
1000:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
1037:1
400 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
412 nits
600 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
430 nits
95.0 %
DCI-P3 COLOR GAMUT
95.5 %
Matte
COATING
Matte
The Acer XB323U-GX (IPS) and LG 32GP850 (IPS) are both poor for casual gaming.
Productivity
4.8/10
5.0/10
2560 x 1440
RESOLUTION
2560 x 1440
91 PPI
PIXELS PER INCH
93 PPI
Yes
ADJUSTABLE STAND
Yes
Matte
COATING
Matte
The LG 32GP850 (IPS) and Acer XB323U-GX (IPS) are both poor for productivity.
Media Consumption
5.4/10
5.5/10
2560 x 1440
RESOLUTION
2560 x 1440
1000:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
1037:1
400 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
412 nits
600 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
430 nits
Matte
COATING
Matte
The LG 32GP850 (IPS) and Acer XB323U-GX (IPS) are both poor for media consumption.
HDR Gaming and Media Consumption
No
No
Both the Acer XB323U-GX (IPS) and LG 32GP850 (IPS) are not suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption.
Digital Photo Editing
Yes
Yes
Both the Acer XB323U-GX (IPS) and LG 32GP850 (IPS) are suitable for digital photo editing.
HDR Video Editing and Color Grading
No
No
Both the Acer XB323U-GX (IPS) and LG 32GP850 (IPS) are not suitable for HDR video editing and color grading.
Give feedback
We’re constantly working to improve.
How the Acer XB323U-GX (IPS) and the LG 32GP850 (IPS) compare to other monitors
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec monitors team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest monitor information and makes it digestible for you.
By the numbers
210
Monitors evaluated
10,500
Monitors stats compiled
15
Proprietary Monitors ratings developed
116,600
Recommendations made
17,490
Consumer hours saved
About the monitor team
Joe Golden, Ph.D
CEO and Monitors Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.
Jason Lew
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.
Chandradeep Chowdhury
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.