If budget is a concern and you prefer ultrawide displays for immersive gaming and multitasking, the Acer X34V makes sense, especially for casual gaming and media consumption. However, if you're a serious gamer who wants a higher pixel density and is prepared to spend more, the Asus PG32UCDM offers better performance for competitive gaming and a higher resolution for sharper images, though it's not as wide which might affect multitasking. Neither are ideal for productivity due to their fair text quality, but both excel in color and contrast for HDR gaming and media. Give Feedback
this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the Acer X34V (QD-OLED)
The Acer X34V (QD-OLED) has no clear advantages over the Asus PG32UCDM (QD-OLED).
Advantages of the Asus PG32UCDM (QD-OLED)
Good for productivity
Very good refresh rate
Key differences
Competitive Gaming
5.2/10
6.4/10
175Hz
REFRESH RATE
240Hz
1.0 ms
TOTAL RESPONSE TIME
0.0 ms
48 - 175 Hz
VARIABLE REFRESH RATE
48 - 240 Hz
No
STROBING / BFI
Yes
250 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
250 nits
The Asus PG32UCDM (QD-OLED) is only fair for competitive gaming, while the Acer X34V (QD-OLED) is poor.
Productivity
5.7/10
7.0/10
3440 x 1440
RESOLUTION
3840 x 2160
109 PPI
PIXELS PER INCH
140 PPI
Yes
ADJUSTABLE STAND
Yes
Matte
COATING
Glossy
The Asus PG32UCDM (QD-OLED) is good for productivity, while the Acer X34V (QD-OLED) is poor.
Cost
$700
$1,300
$0
$500
$1,000
$1,500
$2,000
The Acer X34V (QD-OLED) has a price of $700 and the Asus PG32UCDM (QD-OLED) costs $1,300.
Key similarities
Casual Gaming
9.6/10
9.8/10
3440 x 1440
RESOLUTION
3840 x 2160
175Hz
REFRESH RATE
240Hz
Inf:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
Inf:1
250 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
250 nits
1000 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
250 nits
99.0 %
DCI-P3 COLOR GAMUT
99.0 %
Matte
COATING
Glossy
The Asus PG32UCDM (QD-OLED) and Acer X34V (QD-OLED) are both best in class for casual gaming.
Media Consumption
9.5/10
9.7/10
3440 x 1440
RESOLUTION
3840 x 2160
Inf:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
Inf:1
250 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
250 nits
1000 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
250 nits
Matte
COATING
Glossy
The Asus PG32UCDM (QD-OLED) and Acer X34V (QD-OLED) are both best in class for media consumption.
HDR Gaming and Media Consumption
Yes
Yes
Both the Acer X34V (QD-OLED) and Asus PG32UCDM (QD-OLED) are suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption.
Digital Photo Editing
Yes
Yes
Both the Acer X34V (QD-OLED) and Asus PG32UCDM (QD-OLED) are suitable for digital photo editing.
HDR Video Editing and Color Grading
No
No
Both the Acer X34V (QD-OLED) and Asus PG32UCDM (QD-OLED) are not suitable for HDR video editing and color grading.
Print Photo Editing
No
No
Both the Acer X34V (QD-OLED) and Asus PG32UCDM (QD-OLED) are not suitable for print photo editing.
Give feedback
We’re constantly working to improve.
How the Acer X34V (QD-OLED) and the Asus PG32UCDM (QD-OLED) compare to other monitors
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec monitors team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest monitor information and makes it digestible for you.
By the numbers
210
Monitors evaluated
10,500
Monitors stats compiled
15
Proprietary Monitors ratings developed
116,300
Recommendations made
17,445
Consumer hours saved
About the monitor team
Joe Golden, Ph.D
CEO and Monitors Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.
Jason Lew
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.
Chandradeep Chowdhury
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.