A comparison of specs, key information, reviews, and best pricing from top retailers
Last updated -- hours ago | Report incorrect information
X34V
Company ProductName Specs




PG32UCDM
Company ProductName Specs




What we think

Chevron down
PerfectRec Logo
The PerfectRec monitor team Learn more
Updated April 11, 2024·

If budget is a concern and you prefer ultrawide displays for immersive gaming and multitasking, the Acer X34V makes sense, especially for casual gaming and media consumption. However, if you're a serious gamer who wants a higher pixel density and is prepared to spend more, the Asus PG32UCDM offers better performance for competitive gaming and a higher resolution for sharper images, though it's not as wide which might affect multitasking. Neither are ideal for productivity due to their fair text quality, but both excel in color and contrast for HDR gaming and media. Give Feedback

this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the Acer X34V (QD-OLED)
  • The Acer X34V (QD-OLED) has no clear advantages over the Asus PG32UCDM (QD-OLED).
Advantages of the Asus PG32UCDM (QD-OLED)
  • Good for productivity
  • Very good refresh rate

Key differences

Chevron down

Competitive Gaming

5.2
X34V
PG32UCDM
6.4
175Hz
REFRESH RATE
240Hz
1.0 ms
TOTAL RESPONSE TIME
0.0 ms
48 - 175 Hz
VARIABLE REFRESH RATE
48 - 240 Hz
No
STROBING / BFI
Yes
250 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
250 nits
The Asus PG32UCDM (QD-OLED) is only fair for competitive gaming, while the Acer X34V (QD-OLED) is poor.

Productivity

5.7
X34V
PG32UCDM
7.0
3440 x 1440
RESOLUTION
3840 x 2160
109 PPI
PIXELS PER INCH
140 PPI
Yes
ADJUSTABLE STAND
Yes
Matte
COATING
Glossy
The Asus PG32UCDM (QD-OLED) is good for productivity, while the Acer X34V (QD-OLED) is poor.

Cost

$700
X34V
PG32UCDM
$1,300
Product image
Product image

$0

$500

$1,000

$1,500

$2,000

The Acer X34V (QD-OLED) has a price of $700 and the Asus PG32UCDM (QD-OLED) costs $1,300.

Key similarities

Chevron down

Casual Gaming

9.6
X34V
PG32UCDM
9.8
3440 x 1440
RESOLUTION
3840 x 2160
175Hz
REFRESH RATE
240Hz
Inf:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
Inf:1
250 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
250 nits
1000 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
250 nits
99.0 %
DCI-P3 COLOR GAMUT
99.0 %
Matte
COATING
Glossy
The Asus PG32UCDM (QD-OLED) and Acer X34V (QD-OLED) are both best in class for casual gaming.

Media Consumption

9.5
X34V
PG32UCDM
9.7
3440 x 1440
RESOLUTION
3840 x 2160
Inf:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
Inf:1
250 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
250 nits
1000 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
250 nits
Matte
COATING
Glossy
The Asus PG32UCDM (QD-OLED) and Acer X34V (QD-OLED) are both best in class for media consumption.

HDR Gaming and Media Consumption

Yes
X34V
PG32UCDM
Yes
Both the Acer X34V (QD-OLED) and Asus PG32UCDM (QD-OLED) are suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption.

Digital Photo Editing

Yes
X34V
PG32UCDM
Yes
Both the Acer X34V (QD-OLED) and Asus PG32UCDM (QD-OLED) are suitable for digital photo editing.

HDR Video Editing and Color Grading

No
X34V
PG32UCDM
No
Both the Acer X34V (QD-OLED) and Asus PG32UCDM (QD-OLED) are not suitable for HDR video editing and color grading.

Print Photo Editing

No
X34V
PG32UCDM
No
Both the Acer X34V (QD-OLED) and Asus PG32UCDM (QD-OLED) are not suitable for print photo editing.

Give feedback

We’re constantly working to improve.

How the Acer X34V (QD-OLED) and the Asus PG32UCDM (QD-OLED) compare to other monitors

Chevron down

Spec Comparison

Chevron down
Acer X34V (QD-OLED)Asus PG32UCDM (QD-OLED)
Acer X34V (QD-OLED)Asus PG32UCDM (QD-OLED)

GENERAL

Price
$700
$1,300
Screen Size
34"31.5"
Resolution
3440 x 14403840 x 2160
Screen Type
OLEDOLED
Screen Sub-type
QD-OLEDQD-OLED
Refresh Rate
175Hz240Hz

COLOR, CONTRAST & BRIGHTNESS

Native Contrast
Inf:1Inf:1
SDR Peak Brightness
250 nits250 nits
HDR Peak Brightness
1000 nits250 nits
Suitable for HDR Gaming and Media Consumption
YesYes
sRGB Color Gamut
104 %100 %

MOTION CHARACTERISTICS

Total Response Time
1 ms0.03 ms
Variable Refresh Rate
48 - 175 Hz48 - 240 Hz
Strobing / BFI
NoYes
Persistence Blur Score
7.2/108/10
Ghosting Score
9.6/1010/10

TEXT & IMAGE CLARITY

Pixels Per Inch
109 PPI140 PPI
Coating
MatteGlossy
Text Clarity Score
6.6/106.9/10
Image Clarity Score
7/108/10

PORTS & CONNECTIVITY

HDMI 1.4 Ports
00
HDMI 2.0 Ports
10
HDMI 2.1 Ports
02
Micro HDMI Ports
00
DisplayPort 1.2 Ports
00

Give feedback

We're constantly perfecting our model

FAQs

Chevron down

Why trust us

Chevron down
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec monitors team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest monitor information and makes it digestible for you.

By the numbers

210
Monitors evaluated
10,500
Monitors stats compiled
15
Proprietary Monitors ratings developed
116,300
Recommendations made
17,445
Consumer hours saved

About the monitor team

Joe Golden, Ph.D

CEO and Monitors Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.

Jason Lew

Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.

Chandradeep Chowdhury

Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.

Featured in

Color LTT LogoGeekwire logo9to5 Mac logoPhone Arena LogoColor Daring Fireball logo