A comparison of specs, key information, reviews, and best pricing from top retailers
Last updated -- hours ago | Report incorrect information
X27U
Company ProductName Specs




32GS95UE
Company ProductName Specs




What we think

Chevron down
PerfectRec Logo
The PerfectRec monitor team Learn more
Updated April 22, 2024·

If budget is a concern and you're looking for a solid gaming performance with a lower resolution that's more forgiving on your graphics hardware, the Acer X27U could be a good fit. Its smaller screen size and high refresh rate could be advantageous for competitive gaming. On the other hand, if you're interested in a larger screen with higher resolution for sharper images and you engage in professional photo editing or value more screen real estate for productivity, the LG 32GS95UE could be worth the extra investment. However, the higher resolution might demand more from your computer for gaming. Both monitors have OLED technology which means deep blacks and vivid colors, but this can vary in different lighting conditions due to their matte coatings. The LG's superior size and resolution make it better suited for media consumption and productivity tasks that benefit from crisper text and image clarity. Give Feedback

this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the Acer X27U (W-OLED)
  • Very good for competitive gaming
Advantages of the LG 32GS95UE (W-OLED)
  • Good for productivity
  • Very good for media consumption

Key differences

Chevron down

Competitive Gaming

8.8
X27U
32GS95UE
6.2
240Hz
REFRESH RATE
240Hz
1.4 ms
TOTAL RESPONSE TIME
0.3 ms
20 - 240 Hz
VARIABLE REFRESH RATE
48 - 240 Hz
No
STROBING / BFI
No
211 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
275 nits
The Acer X27U (W-OLED) is very good for competitive gaming, while the LG 32GS95UE (W-OLED) is only fair.

Productivity

5.8
X27U
32GS95UE
7.0
2560 x 1440
RESOLUTION
3840 x 2160
111 PPI
PIXELS PER INCH
140 PPI
Yes
ADJUSTABLE STAND
Yes
Matte
COATING
Matte
The LG 32GS95UE (W-OLED) is good for productivity, while the Acer X27U (W-OLED) is poor.

Media Consumption

7.5
X27U
32GS95UE
8.5
2560 x 1440
RESOLUTION
3840 x 2160
Inf:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
Inf:1
211 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
275 nits
603 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
Unknown
Matte
COATING
Matte
The LG 32GS95UE (W-OLED) is very good for media consumption, while the Acer X27U (W-OLED) is good.

Cost

$1,000
X27U
32GS95UE
$1,400
Product image
Product image

$500

$1,000

$1,500

$2,000

$2,500

The Acer X27U (W-OLED) has a price of $1,000 and the LG 32GS95UE (W-OLED) costs $1,400.

Digital Photo Editing

Yes
X27U
32GS95UE
No
The Acer X27U (W-OLED) is suitable for digital photo editing while the LG 32GS95UE (W-OLED) is not suitable for digital photo editing.

Print Photo Editing

No
X27U
32GS95UE
Yes
The Acer X27U (W-OLED) is not suitable for print photo editing while the LG 32GS95UE (W-OLED) is suitable for print photo editing.

Key similarities

Chevron down

Casual Gaming

9.5
X27U
32GS95UE
9.7
2560 x 1440
RESOLUTION
3840 x 2160
240Hz
REFRESH RATE
240Hz
Inf:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
Inf:1
211 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
275 nits
603 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
Unknown
95.5 %
DCI-P3 COLOR GAMUT
98.5 %
Matte
COATING
Matte
The LG 32GS95UE (W-OLED) and Acer X27U (W-OLED) are both best in class for casual gaming.

HDR Gaming and Media Consumption

Yes
X27U
32GS95UE
Yes
Both the Acer X27U (W-OLED) and LG 32GS95UE (W-OLED) are suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption.

HDR Video Editing and Color Grading

No
X27U
32GS95UE
No
Both the Acer X27U (W-OLED) and LG 32GS95UE (W-OLED) are not suitable for HDR video editing and color grading.

Give feedback

We’re constantly working to improve.

How the Acer X27U (W-OLED) and the LG 32GS95UE (W-OLED) compare to other monitors

Chevron down

Spec Comparison

Chevron down
Acer X27U (W-OLED)LG 32GS95UE (W-OLED)
Acer X27U (W-OLED)LG 32GS95UE (W-OLED)

GENERAL

Price
$1,000
$1,400
Screen Size
27"32"
Resolution
2560 x 14403840 x 2160
Screen Type
OLEDOLED
Screen Sub-type
W-OLEDW-OLED
Refresh Rate
240Hz240Hz

COLOR, CONTRAST & BRIGHTNESS

Native Contrast
Inf:1Inf:1
SDR Peak Brightness
211 nits275 nits
HDR Peak Brightness
603 nitsUnknown
Suitable for HDR Gaming and Media Consumption
YesYes
sRGB Color Gamut
100 %98.5 %

MOTION CHARACTERISTICS

Total Response Time
1.4 ms0.3 ms
Variable Refresh Rate
20 - 240 Hz48 - 240 Hz
Strobing / BFI
NoNo
Persistence Blur Score
8/108/10
Ghosting Score
9.5/109.9/10

TEXT & IMAGE CLARITY

Pixels Per Inch
111 PPI140 PPI
Coating
MatteMatte
Text Clarity Score
6.7/106.9/10
Image Clarity Score
7.2/108/10

PORTS & CONNECTIVITY

HDMI 1.4 Ports
00
HDMI 2.0 Ports
20
HDMI 2.1 Ports
02
Micro HDMI Ports
00
DisplayPort 1.2 Ports
00

Give feedback

We're constantly perfecting our model

FAQs

Chevron down

Why trust us

Chevron down
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec monitors team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest monitor information and makes it digestible for you.

By the numbers

210
Monitors evaluated
10,500
Monitors stats compiled
15
Proprietary Monitors ratings developed
120,200
Recommendations made
18,030
Consumer hours saved

About the monitor team

Joe Golden, Ph.D

CEO and Monitors Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.

Jason Lew

Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.

Chandradeep Chowdhury

Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.

Featured in

Color LTT LogoGeekwire logo9to5 Mac logoPhone Arena LogoColor Daring Fireball logo