A comparison of specs, key information, reviews, and best pricing from top retailers
Last updated -- hours ago | Report incorrect information
X27U
Company ProductName Specs




32GP850
Company ProductName Specs




What we think

Chevron down
PerfectRec Logo
The PerfectRec monitor team Learn more
Updated April 11, 2024·

If your focus is on competitive gaming and experiencing the best contrast and response times for a more immersive experience, the Acer X27U with its OLED panel is a superior choice, particularly for HDR gaming and media consumption. However, this comes at a premium price. On the other hand, the LG 32GP850 offers a larger screen with good performance for casual gaming and productivity at a more affordable cost. It does not perform as well for HDR content, and its response times aren't as swift, which could be less ideal for fast-paced competitive games. Give Feedback

this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the Acer X27U (W-OLED)
  • Best in class for casual gaming
  • Very good for competitive gaming
  • Good for media consumption
  • Very good refresh rate
  • Good image clarity
  • Best in class contrast
  • Best in class response time
Advantages of the LG 32GP850 (IPS)
  • Good brightness

Key differences

Chevron down

Casual Gaming

9.5
X27U
32GP850
5.8
2560 x 1440
RESOLUTION
2560 x 1440
240Hz
REFRESH RATE
180Hz
Inf:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
1037:1
211 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
412 nits
603 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
430 nits
95.5 %
DCI-P3 COLOR GAMUT
95.5 %
Matte
COATING
Matte
The Acer X27U (W-OLED) is best in class for casual gaming, while the LG 32GP850 (IPS) is poor.

Competitive Gaming

8.8
X27U
32GP850
4.8
240Hz
REFRESH RATE
180Hz
1.4 ms
TOTAL RESPONSE TIME
6.2 ms
20 - 240 Hz
VARIABLE REFRESH RATE
20 - 180 Hz
No
STROBING / BFI
Yes
211 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
412 nits
The Acer X27U (W-OLED) is very good for competitive gaming, while the LG 32GP850 (IPS) is poor.

Productivity

5.8
X27U
32GP850
5.0
2560 x 1440
RESOLUTION
2560 x 1440
111 PPI
PIXELS PER INCH
93 PPI
Yes
ADJUSTABLE STAND
Yes
Matte
COATING
Matte
The Acer X27U (W-OLED) and LG 32GP850 (IPS) are both poor for productivity, though the Acer X27U (W-OLED) is somewhat better.

Media Consumption

7.5
X27U
32GP850
5.5
2560 x 1440
RESOLUTION
2560 x 1440
Inf:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
1037:1
211 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
412 nits
603 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
430 nits
Matte
COATING
Matte
The Acer X27U (W-OLED) is good for media consumption, while the LG 32GP850 (IPS) is poor.

Cost

$1,000
X27U
32GP850
$600
Product image
Product image

$200

$400

$600

$800

$1,000

$1,200

$1,400

$1,600

The Acer X27U (W-OLED) has a price of $1,000 and the LG 32GP850 (IPS) costs $600.

HDR Gaming and Media Consumption

Yes
X27U
32GP850
No
The Acer X27U (W-OLED) is suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption while the LG 32GP850 (IPS) is not suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption.

Key similarities

Chevron down

Digital Photo Editing

Yes
X27U
32GP850
Yes
Both the Acer X27U (W-OLED) and LG 32GP850 (IPS) are suitable for digital photo editing.

HDR Video Editing and Color Grading

No
X27U
32GP850
No
Both the Acer X27U (W-OLED) and LG 32GP850 (IPS) are not suitable for HDR video editing and color grading.

Print Photo Editing

No
X27U
32GP850
No
Both the Acer X27U (W-OLED) and LG 32GP850 (IPS) are not suitable for print photo editing.

Give feedback

We’re constantly working to improve.

How the Acer X27U (W-OLED) and the LG 32GP850 (IPS) compare to other monitors

Chevron down

Spec Comparison

Chevron down
Acer X27U (W-OLED)LG 32GP850 (IPS)
Acer X27U (W-OLED)LG 32GP850 (IPS)

GENERAL

Price
$1,000
$600
Screen Size
27"32"
Resolution
2560 x 14402560 x 1440
Screen Type
OLEDLED
Screen Sub-type
W-OLEDIPS
Refresh Rate
240Hz180Hz

COLOR, CONTRAST & BRIGHTNESS

Native Contrast
Inf:11037:1
SDR Peak Brightness
211 nits412 nits
HDR Peak Brightness
603 nits430 nits
Suitable for HDR Gaming and Media Consumption
YesNo
sRGB Color Gamut
100 %100 %

MOTION CHARACTERISTICS

Total Response Time
1.4 ms6.2 ms
Variable Refresh Rate
20 - 240 Hz20 - 180 Hz
Strobing / BFI
NoYes
Persistence Blur Score
8/107.3/10
Ghosting Score
9.5/108/10

TEXT & IMAGE CLARITY

Pixels Per Inch
111 PPI93 PPI
Coating
MatteMatte
Text Clarity Score
6.7/106.3/10
Image Clarity Score
7.2/106.3/10

PORTS & CONNECTIVITY

HDMI 1.4 Ports
01
HDMI 2.0 Ports
22
HDMI 2.1 Ports
00
Micro HDMI Ports
00
DisplayPort 1.2 Ports
00

Give feedback

We're constantly perfecting our model

FAQs

Chevron down

Why trust us

Chevron down
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec monitors team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest monitor information and makes it digestible for you.

By the numbers

210
Monitors evaluated
10,500
Monitors stats compiled
15
Proprietary Monitors ratings developed
120,200
Recommendations made
18,030
Consumer hours saved

About the monitor team

Joe Golden, Ph.D

CEO and Monitors Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.

Jason Lew

Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.

Chandradeep Chowdhury

Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.

Featured in

Color LTT LogoGeekwire logo9to5 Mac logoPhone Arena LogoColor Daring Fireball logo