A comparison of specs, key information, reviews, and best pricing from top retailers
Last updated -- hours ago | Report incorrect information
X27U
Company ProductName Specs




24G2SPU
Company ProductName Specs




What we think

Chevron down
PerfectRec Logo
The PerfectRec monitor team Learn more
Updated April 12, 2024·

If you're a competitive gamer or involved in digital photo editing, the Acer X27U with its superior response times and color accuracy will serve you well, but it comes at a premium price. Conversely, if you're on a budget and mostly engage in casual gaming, productivity tasks, or if price is a significant concern, the AOC 24G2SPU is a cost-effective choice with good performance for everyday use, though it won't match the Acer's prowess in high-speed gaming or color-intensive tasks. Neither are ideal for HDR video editing, but for HDR gaming and media consumption, only the Acer X27U is suitable. Give Feedback

this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the Acer X27U (W-OLED)
  • Best in class for casual gaming
  • Very good for competitive gaming
  • Good for media consumption
  • Very good refresh rate
  • Good image clarity
  • Best in class contrast
  • Best in class response time
Advantages of the AOC 24G2SPU (IPS)
  • The AOC 24G2SPU (IPS) has no clear advantages over the Acer X27U (W-OLED).

Key differences

Chevron down

Casual Gaming

9.5
X27U
24G2SPU
5.8
2560 x 1440
RESOLUTION
1920 x 1080
240Hz
REFRESH RATE
165Hz
Inf:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
1000:1
211 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
300 nits
603 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
N/A
95.5 %
DCI-P3 COLOR GAMUT
89.0 %
Matte
COATING
Matte
The Acer X27U (W-OLED) is best in class for casual gaming, while the AOC 24G2SPU (IPS) is poor.

Competitive Gaming

8.8
X27U
24G2SPU
5.8
240Hz
REFRESH RATE
165Hz
1.4 ms
TOTAL RESPONSE TIME
4.0 ms
20 - 240 Hz
VARIABLE REFRESH RATE
48 - 165 Hz
No
STROBING / BFI
No
211 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
300 nits
The Acer X27U (W-OLED) is very good for competitive gaming, while the AOC 24G2SPU (IPS) is poor.

Productivity

5.8
X27U
24G2SPU
4.9
2560 x 1440
RESOLUTION
1920 x 1080
111 PPI
PIXELS PER INCH
92 PPI
Yes
ADJUSTABLE STAND
Yes
Matte
COATING
Matte
The Acer X27U (W-OLED) and AOC 24G2SPU (IPS) are both poor for productivity, though the Acer X27U (W-OLED) is somewhat better.

Media Consumption

7.5
X27U
24G2SPU
5.4
2560 x 1440
RESOLUTION
1920 x 1080
Inf:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
1000:1
211 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
300 nits
603 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
N/A
Matte
COATING
Matte
The Acer X27U (W-OLED) is good for media consumption, while the AOC 24G2SPU (IPS) is poor.

Cost

$1,000
X27U
24G2SPU
$140
Product image
Product image

$0

$500

$1,000

$1,500

$2,000

The Acer X27U (W-OLED) has a price of $1,000 and the AOC 24G2SPU (IPS) costs $140.

HDR Gaming and Media Consumption

Yes
X27U
24G2SPU
No
The Acer X27U (W-OLED) is suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption while the AOC 24G2SPU (IPS) is not suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption.

Key similarities

Chevron down

Digital Photo Editing

Yes
X27U
24G2SPU
Yes
Both the Acer X27U (W-OLED) and AOC 24G2SPU (IPS) are suitable for digital photo editing.

HDR Video Editing and Color Grading

No
X27U
24G2SPU
No
Both the Acer X27U (W-OLED) and AOC 24G2SPU (IPS) are not suitable for HDR video editing and color grading.

Print Photo Editing

No
X27U
24G2SPU
No
Both the Acer X27U (W-OLED) and AOC 24G2SPU (IPS) are not suitable for print photo editing.

Give feedback

We’re constantly working to improve.

How the Acer X27U (W-OLED) and the AOC 24G2SPU (IPS) compare to other monitors

Chevron down

Spec Comparison

Chevron down
Acer X27U (W-OLED)AOC 24G2SPU (IPS)
Acer X27U (W-OLED)AOC 24G2SPU (IPS)

GENERAL

Price
$1,000
$140
Screen Size
27"24"
Resolution
2560 x 14401920 x 1080
Screen Type
OLEDLED
Screen Sub-type
W-OLEDIPS
Refresh Rate
240Hz165Hz

COLOR, CONTRAST & BRIGHTNESS

Native Contrast
Inf:11000:1
SDR Peak Brightness
211 nits300 nits
HDR Peak Brightness
603 nitsN/A
Suitable for HDR Gaming and Media Consumption
YesNo
sRGB Color Gamut
100 %126 %

MOTION CHARACTERISTICS

Total Response Time
1.4 ms4 ms
Variable Refresh Rate
20 - 240 Hz48 - 165 Hz
Strobing / BFI
NoNo
Persistence Blur Score
8/107.1/10
Ghosting Score
9.5/108.3/10

TEXT & IMAGE CLARITY

Pixels Per Inch
111 PPI92 PPI
Coating
MatteMatte
Text Clarity Score
6.7/106.2/10
Image Clarity Score
7.2/106.2/10

PORTS & CONNECTIVITY

HDMI 1.4 Ports
02
HDMI 2.0 Ports
20
HDMI 2.1 Ports
00
Micro HDMI Ports
00
DisplayPort 1.2 Ports
01

Give feedback

We're constantly perfecting our model

FAQs

Chevron down

Why trust us

Chevron down
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec monitors team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest monitor information and makes it digestible for you.

By the numbers

210
Monitors evaluated
10,500
Monitors stats compiled
15
Proprietary Monitors ratings developed
116,300
Recommendations made
17,445
Consumer hours saved

About the monitor team

Joe Golden, Ph.D

CEO and Monitors Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.

Jason Lew

Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.

Chandradeep Chowdhury

Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.

Featured in

Color LTT LogoGeekwire logo9to5 Mac logoPhone Arena LogoColor Daring Fireball logo