Choosing between the MSI GP66 Leopard and the Razer Blade 18 depends on your priorities. The MSI is more affordable and adequate for general use and gaming but has lower battery life and less power than the Razer. Conversely, the Razer Blade 18 offers top-end performance suitable for demanding tasks like 3D rendering and engineering but comes at a higher cost, with more RAM and storage, better screen quality, and a larger display. However, it is heavier and thus less portable, with a slightly shorter battery life due to its more powerful components. Give Feedback
this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the MSI GP66 Leopard
The MSI GP66 Leopard has no clear advantages over the Razer Blade 18.
Advantages of the Razer Blade 18
Very good for general use
Excellent for engineering and design
Very good for gaming and AI
Very good for software development
Very good for content creation
Very good overall display quality
Best in class speakers
Excellent keyboard
Key differences
General Use
7.5/10
8.5/10
1920 x 1080
RESOLUTION
2560 x 1600
IPS
DISPLAY TECHNOLOGY
IPS
362.0 nits
DISPLAY BRIGHTNESS
524.0 nits
5.0 Hours
BATTERY LIFE
4.0 Hours
8.0/10
KEYBOARD QUALITY SCORE
9.0/10
6.8/10
PORTABILITY SCORE
6.1/10
The Razer Blade 18 is very good for general use, while the MSI GP66 Leopard is good.
The Razer Blade 18 outshines the MSI GP66 Leopard for general use due to its superior CPU and double the RAM, ensuring smoother multitasking and faster performance, paired with a larger, higher-resolution screen that offers more vibrant colors and greater detail for an enhanced viewing experience. Although the Razer Blade 18 is less portable and has a slightly shorter battery life than the MSI GP66 Leopard, its overall build quality, keyboard, and speaker scores indicate a premium experience, which might justify its tradeoffs if one values power and screen quality above mobility and battery longevity.
Gaming and AI
7.8/10
8.9/10
8.7/10
OVERALL GPU SCORE
8.9/10
1920 x 1080
RESOLUTION
2560 x 1600
144Hz
REFRESH RATE
240Hz
Yes
SUPPORTS DLSS
Yes
Yes
MUX SWITCH / ADVANCED OPTIMUS
Yes
6.5/10
FAN NOISE SCORE
7.2/10
The Razer Blade 18 is very good for gaming and AI, while the MSI GP66 Leopard is good.
The MSI GP66 Leopard offers solid gaming and 3D performance with an Nvidia RTX 3080 GPU and a 144Hz screen refresh rate, which are highly suitable for smooth gameplay and graphics rendering. In contrast, the Razer Blade 18 steps up the game with an even more powerful Nvidia RTX 4070 GPU and a higher 240Hz refresh rate, making it exceptional for gaming and demanding 3D work, while also providing a larger display and higher resolution for more detailed visuals.
Engineering and Design
7.9/10
9.3/10
7.4/10
OVERALL CPU SCORE
9.9/10
8.7/10
OVERALL GPU SCORE
8.9/10
16.0 GB
RAM
32.0 GB
The Razer Blade 18 is excellent for engineering and design, while the MSI GP66 Leopard is good.
The Razer Blade 18 offers a more powerful CPU and double the RAM compared to the MSI GP66 Leopard, inherently providing higher performance for engineering and design tasks which often demand substantial computing resources. Additionally, with a superior GPU and higher resolution, color-accurate screen, the Razer Blade 18 ensures detailed and vibrant visuals essential for design work, though the MSI GP66 Leopard still delivers robust performance in a more portable package.
Content Creation
7.4/10
8.6/10
7.4/10
OVERALL CPU SCORE
9.9/10
1920 x 1080
RESOLUTION
2560 x 1600
16.0 GB
RAM
32.0 GB
IPS
DISPLAY TECHNOLOGY
IPS
The Razer Blade 18 is very good for content creation, while the MSI GP66 Leopard is good.
PerfectRec’s Content Creation Score takes into account the many different features of the laptop that make it more or less suitable for photo editing, video editing and other content creation tasks.
Software Development
7.2/10
8.5/10
7.4/10
OVERALL CPU SCORE
9.9/10
16.0 GB
RAM
32.0 GB
1920 x 1080
RESOLUTION
2560 x 1600
8.0/10
KEYBOARD QUALITY SCORE
9.0/10
The Razer Blade 18 is very good for software development, while the MSI GP66 Leopard is good.
PerfectRec’s Software Development Score takes into account the many different features of the laptop that make it more or less suitable for software developers.
Screen Quality
7.5/10
8.9/10
15.6in
SIZE
18.0in
1920 x 1080
RESOLUTION
2560 x 1600
IPS
DISPLAY TECHNOLOGY
IPS
144Hz
REFRESH RATE
240Hz
362.0 nits
BRIGHTNESS
524.0 nits
The Razer Blade 18 has a better screen than the MSI GP66 Leopard for general use, gaming and AI, engineering and design, content creation, and software development.
For general use, a laptop with a brighter display, higher resolution, and superior panel technology provides a more vibrant and sharper visual experience, which is why the Razer Blade 18 performs well in this regard. For engineering and design work, accurate colors are crucial, and a wide color gamut display, such as the one found on the Razer Blade 18, ensures that the colors you see on-screen are true to life, making it a solid choice. Meanwhile, for gaming and 3D applications, a high refresh rate is key to smooth motion rendering; however, the MSI GP66 Leopard and Razer Blade 18 may not satisfy the most demanding gamers due to poorer refresh rates compared to other gaming-focused laptops.
Portability
Fair
Fair
15.6in
SIZE
18.0in
5.2 lbs
WEIGHT
6.6 lbs
0.9in
THICKNESS
0.8in
The MSI GP66 Leopard and Razer Blade 18 both have only fair portability, though the MSI GP66 Leopard has somewhat better portability.
The most portable laptops are small, thin, and light.
Cost
$1,400
$10
$0
$500
$1,000
$1,500
$2,000
$2,500
The MSI GP66 Leopard has a price of $1,400 and the Razer Blade 18 costs $10.
"The MSI GP66 Leopard is a good budget high-performance gamer. The MSI also does a lot right outside of the pure performance despite it's low price. For example, the adaptive cooling system really surprised us positively, even in Extreme Performance Mode. And the display is not a budget panel either, but at least outshines the competition in terms of brightness. Of course, you also have to accept a few compromises in this price category. These include the Leopard's poor battery runtimes and the less than optimal build quality, which is also noticeable in the more complicated maintenance."
"Razer made a powerful laptop in the Blade 18, showing off a beautiful and fast display and the same high-quality build we’ve come to expect from this product line. It’s also quite expensive, which is hardly a surprise, but bears repeating even in this price range. It’s pricier than the Scar 18 despite an inferior GPU and half the storage, so you really have to want the Blade 18’s design to justify the cost."
Get a great deal on the MSI GP66 Leopard or the Razer Blade 18
About MSI
MSI, also known as Micro-Star International, is a Taiwanese technology corporation. MSI is known for their wide range of gaming devices. Their series include the entry-level Cyborg/Thin and Sword/Katana series, the mid-range Bravo/Delta and Crosshair/Pulse series, and their high-end Vector, Raider, Stealth, and Titan GT series. At every performance level, MSI offers a variety of devices with varying balances between performance, battery life, weight, and price, making them a solid option to consider at every price point.
About Razer
Razer is an American-Singaporean technology company. Razer is best known for their Blade series laptops, well known for their strong performance and sleek design. Although Razer charges a premium price tag for their laptops, buyers can expect a stealthy laptop with clean fit and finish and strong performance. All of their models offer great portability and build quality compared to other gaming laptops.
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec laptops team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest laptop information and makes it digestible for you.
By the numbers
380
Laptops evaluated
48,640
Laptops stats compiled
13
Proprietary Laptops ratings developed
97,095
Recommendations made
21,038
Consumer hours saved
About the laptop team
Joe Golden, Ph.D
CEO and Laptops Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.
Jason Lew
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.
Chandradeep Chowdhury
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.
Craig Russell
Laptops Expert
Craig is a UK-based laptops expert. Craig works in IT, where he recommends and supports laptops and PCs for clients and has been recommending laptops on Reddit for five years.