Choosing between the ASUS TUF Gaming A16 and the Gigabyte Aero 17, consider the Aero 17 if you need a higher-resolution screen for tasks like video editing or design. It also offers a more powerful graphics card, better for high-end gaming or professional 3D work. However, it is heavier, making it less convenient for travel. On the other hand, the TUF Gaming A16 is more affordable, and while it has a lower resolution screen and less graphically powerful, it is lighter, enhancing its portability. If you're after a gaming laptop and want to save money, the A16 may suit your needs without breaking the bank. Give Feedback
this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the ASUS TUF Gaming A16
Good portability
Very good battery life
Advantages of the Gigabyte Aero 17
Very good for general use
Very good for engineering and design
Very good for content creation
Excellent overall display quality
Very good overall build quality
Very good keyboard
Key differences
Engineering and Design
7.7/10
8.8/10
7.9/10
OVERALL CPU SCORE
9.1/10
7.7/10
OVERALL GPU SCORE
7.8/10
16.0 GB
RAM
16.0 GB
The Gigabyte Aero 17 is very good for engineering and design, while the ASUS TUF Gaming A16 is good.
The Gigabyte Aero 17 outperforms the ASUS TUF Gaming A16 in engineering and design due to its more powerful Intel CPU and Nvidia GPU, as well as its superior screen quality with a Mini LED display and higher resolution, providing sharper images and better color accuracy. Conversely, the ASUS TUF Gaming A16 offers greater portability with longer battery life and lower weight, which may benefit users needing mobility, but its performance and screen quality are less suited for intensive engineering and design tasks compared to the Aero 17.
Content Creation
7.6/10
8.4/10
7.9/10
OVERALL CPU SCORE
9.1/10
1920 x 1200
RESOLUTION
3840 x 2160
16.0 GB
RAM
16.0 GB
IPS
DISPLAY TECHNOLOGY
Mini LED
The Gigabyte Aero 17 is very good for content creation, while the ASUS TUF Gaming A16 is good.
PerfectRec’s Content Creation Score takes into account the many different features of the laptop that make it more or less suitable for photo editing, video editing and other content creation tasks.
Software Development
7.3/10
7.9/10
7.9/10
OVERALL CPU SCORE
9.1/10
16.0 GB
RAM
16.0 GB
1920 x 1200
RESOLUTION
3840 x 2160
7.0/10
KEYBOARD QUALITY SCORE
8.5/10
The Gigabyte Aero 17 and ASUS TUF Gaming A16 are both good for software development, though the Gigabyte Aero 17 is somewhat better.
PerfectRec’s Software Development Score takes into account the many different features of the laptop that make it more or less suitable for software developers.
Screen Quality
7.5/10
9.2/10
16.0in
SIZE
17.3in
1920 x 1200
RESOLUTION
3840 x 2160
IPS
DISPLAY TECHNOLOGY
Mini LED
165Hz
REFRESH RATE
120Hz
294.0 nits
BRIGHTNESS
368.0 nits
The Gigabyte Aero 17 has a better screen than the ASUS TUF Gaming A16 for general use, gaming and AI, engineering and design, content creation, and software development.
The ASUS TUF Gaming A16's screen offers a balance suitable for everyday tasks and professional design work due to its appropriate resolution, brightness, and color coverage, but falls short for gaming and 3D applications due to a lower refresh rate. The Gigabyte Aero 17, on the other hand, shines in general use and engineering with its superior resolution, high brightness, and wide color gamuts, ensuring precise color work, yet it isn't optimized for gaming or 3D modeling because of its lower refresh rate, despite decent resolution and panel quality. Both screens miss the mark for 3D work and gaming primarily because high refresh rates, which provide smoother motion and better responsiveness, are not their strength.
Battery
12.0 Hours
5.5 Hours
The ASUS TUF Gaming A16 has 12 hours of battery life. The Gigabyte Aero 17 has 5.5 hours of battery life.
Battery life estimate is based on a mix of common use patterns. More portable and higher performing laptops tend to have less battery life.
Build Quality
7.2/10
8.0/10
The Gigabyte Aero 17 has very good build quality, while the ASUS TUF Gaming A16 has good build quality.
PerfectRec’s Build Quality Score incorporates case materials, display and keyboard flex, hinge quality, and overall reliability.
Cost
$838
$2,071
$0
$500
$1,000
$1,500
$2,000
$2,500
$3,000
$3,500
The ASUS TUF Gaming A16 has a price of $838 and the Gigabyte Aero 17 costs $2,071.
Although they have very similar scores, PerfectRec considers Gigabyte Aero 17 to be very good for general use, while the ASUS TUF Gaming A16 is good.
The ASUS TUF Gaming A16 offers a solid balance for general use with a high-refresh-rate screen, robust battery life, and sufficient power for everyday tasks through its AMD CPU and RAM, making it also portable due to its manageable weight. In contrast, the Gigabyte Aero 17 provides a superior screen quality with a higher resolution and wider color gamut, along with more storage and a high-performance CPU, but at the cost of less portability and shorter battery life, catering to those who need a more powerful workstation on the go.
Gaming and AI
7.4/10
7.9/10
7.7/10
OVERALL GPU SCORE
7.8/10
1920 x 1200
RESOLUTION
3840 x 2160
165Hz
REFRESH RATE
120Hz
No
SUPPORTS DLSS
Yes
Yes
MUX SWITCH / ADVANCED OPTIMUS
No
6.7/10
FAN NOISE SCORE
6.5/10
The Gigabyte Aero 17 and ASUS TUF Gaming A16 are both good for gaming and AI.
The ASUS TUF Gaming A16 offers good gaming and 3D performance with its AMD RX 7600S GPU and a high screen refresh rate, while the Gigabyte Aero 17 is considered even better due to its superior Nvidia RTX 3070 Ti GPU and a slightly better screen refresh rate, alongside a Mini LED display for higher screen quality compared to the A16's IPS display.
Portability
Good
Fair
16.0in
SIZE
17.3in
4.8 lbs
WEIGHT
5.7 lbs
0.9in
THICKNESS
0.9in
Although they have very similar scores, PerfectRec considers ASUS TUF Gaming A16 to have good portability, while the Gigabyte Aero 17 has only fair portability.
The most portable laptops are small, thin, and light.
Give feedback
We’re constantly working to improve.
How the ASUS TUF Gaming A16 and the Gigabyte Aero 17 compare to other laptops
"The A16 makes an excellent case against more expensive laptops like the Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 and the MSI Katana GF76, especially if you’re into 1080p gaming. However, although its affordable, it doesn’t skimp on performance or a robust chassis. But for me, the biggest factor that sets it apart from these options is its incredible battery life. In my time reviewing laptops, I can’t remember when I last saw a gaming laptop lasted 11 and a half hours on a single charge, which makes the A16, in my book, truly outstanding."
"Not only is the Aero 17 a very good laptop for gamers but also for content creators. With the upgrade to the Intel Core i9-11980HK, Gigabyte particularly improved the system performance. In addition, the hardware package is rounded by the extremely fast SSD and 32 GB of working memory in dual-channel mode. Compared to the predecessor, the battery life is reduced only moderately, and the 4K display also basically keeps its good qualities."
Get a great deal on the ASUS TUF Gaming A16 or the Gigabyte Aero 17
About ASUS
ASUS, a Taiwanese electronics brand, is one of the largest personal computer vendor by market share. The majority of their laptops are targeted towards personal use or gaming. Their most popular product lines include the budget-friendly VivoBook, more premium ZenBook, and their TUF and ROG gaming laptops, the latter of which has a reputation for excellent gaming performance.
About Gigabyte
Gigabyte is a Taiwanese computer hardware manufacturer. While Gigabyte mainly focuses its business on desktop hardware, Gigabyte is known for its value-oriented G series laptops, thin and light Aero series, and performance-oriented Aorus series. Gigabyte laptops offer a strong value proposition to compete with mainstream alternatives.
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec laptops team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest laptop information and makes it digestible for you.
By the numbers
380
Laptops evaluated
48,640
Laptops stats compiled
13
Proprietary Laptops ratings developed
100,695
Recommendations made
21,818
Consumer hours saved
About the laptop team
Joe Golden, Ph.D
CEO and Laptops Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.
Jason Lew
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.
Chandradeep Chowdhury
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.
Craig Russell
Laptops Expert
Craig is a UK-based laptops expert. Craig works in IT, where he recommends and supports laptops and PCs for clients and has been recommending laptops on Reddit for five years.