The ASUS R410MA is more budget-friendly and lighter, suitable for basic tasks with its modest Intel Celeron processor and integrated graphics, and it has a longer battery life. If you require more power for activities like 3D rendering, machine learning, or gaming, the MSI GF63 Thin, while pricier, offers a significantly stronger Intel i5 processor and dedicated Nvidia graphics. The MSI also has a larger and sharper display, more storage, double the RAM, and a sturdier build, but it is heavier and has a shorter battery life, making it less ideal for frequent travel. Give Feedback
this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the ASUS R410MA
Very good portability
Good battery life
Advantages of the MSI GF63 Thin
Good keyboard
Key differences
Gaming and AI
5.4/10
6.0/10
3.5/10
OVERALL GPU SCORE
4.2/10
1366 x 768
RESOLUTION
1920 x 1080
60Hz
REFRESH RATE
60Hz
No
SUPPORTS DLSS
No
No
MUX SWITCH / ADVANCED OPTIMUS
No
7.0/10
FAN NOISE SCORE
8.0/10
The MSI GF63 Thin is only fair for gaming and AI, while the ASUS R410MA is poor.
The ASUS R410MA offers inferior gaming and 3D performance due to its basic onboard graphics chip, Intel UHD Graphics 600, which is not designed for demanding tasks, paired with a lower resolution and standard refresh rate screen. In contrast, the MSI GF63 Thin includes a dedicated Nvidia GTX 1650 Max-Q graphics card and a higher resolution display, providing a more suitable setup for gaming and 3D applications, though both laptops share the same screen refresh rate.
Engineering and Design
5.3/10
6.0/10
3.3/10
OVERALL CPU SCORE
4.3/10
3.5/10
OVERALL GPU SCORE
4.2/10
4.0 GB
RAM
8.0 GB
The MSI GF63 Thin is only fair for engineering and design, while the ASUS R410MA is poor.
The ASUS R410MA's Intel Celeron processor and Intel UHD Graphics are less suited for demanding engineering and design applications compared to the MSI GF63 Thin's stronger Intel i5 processor and Nvidia GTX graphics card, which significantly enhance performance. Additionally, the MSI has a higher quality IPS display with a full HD resolution that provides better screen clarity for detailed work, whereas the ASUS has a lower resolution TN panel with less impressive color and viewing angles.
Screen Quality
5.1/10
6.1/10
14.0in
SIZE
15.6in
1366 x 768
RESOLUTION
1920 x 1080
TN
DISPLAY TECHNOLOGY
IPS
60Hz
REFRESH RATE
60Hz
200.0 nits
BRIGHTNESS
249.0 nits
The MSI GF63 Thin has a better screen than the ASUS R410MA for general use, gaming and AI, engineering and design, content creation, and software development.
For general use, the ASUS R410MA's screen may disappoint due to lower resolution and dimmer display, which can affect the clarity and comfort during everyday tasks, while the MSI GF63 Thin offers a crisper and brighter image, making it more suitable. In engineering and design, where precise color reproduction is crucial, the ASUS's limited color range can hinder the accuracy needed for professional work, whereas the MSI's adequate coverage of color gamuts will serve better, though it's not top-tier. Lastly, the MSI GF63 Thin's higher refresh rate allows for smoother visuals important in 3D applications, but both laptops may fall short for high-end gaming or detailed 3D work due to their less than optimal refresh rates and moderate resolution.
Battery
8.5 Hours
4.2 Hours
The ASUS R410MA has 8.5 hours of battery life. The MSI GF63 Thin has 4.3 hours of battery life.
Battery life estimate is based on a mix of common use patterns. More portable and higher performing laptops tend to have less battery life.
Portability
Very Good
Good
14.0in
SIZE
15.6in
2.8 lbs
WEIGHT
4.1 lbs
0.7in
THICKNESS
0.8in
The ASUS R410MA has very good portability, while the MSI GF63 Thin has good portability.
The most portable laptops are small, thin, and light.
Build Quality
5.1/10
6.5/10
The MSI GF63 Thin has only fair build quality, while the ASUS R410MA has poor build quality.
PerfectRec’s Build Quality Score incorporates case materials, display and keyboard flex, hinge quality, and overall reliability.
Cost
$111
$599
$0
$200
$400
$600
$800
$1,000
The ASUS R410MA has a price of $111 and the MSI GF63 Thin costs $599.
Although they have very similar scores, PerfectRec considers MSI GF63 Thin to be only fair for general use, while the ASUS R410MA is poor.
The ASUS R410MA's less powerful Intel Celeron processor, lower RAM, and lower quality TN screen contribute to its poor performance in general use compared to the MSI GF63 Thin, which has a more robust Intel i5 processor, greater RAM, and a higher quality IPS display ensuring better multitasking capability and viewing experience. Additionally, the MSI GF63 Thin, while heavier and with potentially shorter battery life, offers a backlit keyboard and better heat management, making it a fair option for general use despite being less portable than the ASUS model.
Content Creation
5.7/10
6.0/10
3.3/10
OVERALL CPU SCORE
4.3/10
1366 x 768
RESOLUTION
1920 x 1080
4.0 GB
RAM
8.0 GB
TN
DISPLAY TECHNOLOGY
IPS
Although they have very similar scores, PerfectRec considers MSI GF63 Thin to be only fair for content creation, while the ASUS R410MA is poor.
PerfectRec’s Content Creation Score takes into account the many different features of the laptop that make it more or less suitable for photo editing, video editing and other content creation tasks.
Software Development
5.6/10
6.0/10
3.3/10
OVERALL CPU SCORE
4.3/10
4.0 GB
RAM
8.0 GB
1366 x 768
RESOLUTION
1920 x 1080
5.3/10
KEYBOARD QUALITY SCORE
7.0/10
Although they have very similar scores, PerfectRec considers MSI GF63 Thin to be only fair for software development, while the ASUS R410MA is poor.
PerfectRec’s Software Development Score takes into account the many different features of the laptop that make it more or less suitable for software developers.
Give feedback
We’re constantly working to improve.
How the ASUS R410MA and the MSI GF63 Thin compare to other laptops
"The Asus Laptop L410 is a super-affordable PC, even among budget notebooks, compromising on the display and processing power to deliver a serviceable Windows machine with good battery life and useful ports. The build is reasonably solid, there’s a good mix of ports, battery life is long enough, and it can perform basic everyday tasks. On the flip side, the screen is poor, anything other than basic tasks is a tough ask, and it has little memory and even less storage."
"If you leave aside the meagre port selection (no card reader, no DisplayPort, no Thunderbolt 3 or USB 3.1 Gen2), the fan control that could be improved (idle mode!) and the relatively dark and slow display, the MSI GF63 Thin 9SC does not have any major weaknesses. The 15-inch gamer is compact, has a low weight and offers a good price-to-performance ratio, which should please gamers that are looking for both a portable and an affordable gaming notebook. Input devices, battery life, case quality and performance are all appropriate for this purchase price."
Get a great deal on the ASUS R410MA or the MSI GF63 Thin
About ASUS
ASUS, a Taiwanese electronics brand, is one of the largest personal computer vendor by market share. The majority of their laptops are targeted towards personal use or gaming. Their most popular product lines include the budget-friendly VivoBook, more premium ZenBook, and their TUF and ROG gaming laptops, the latter of which has a reputation for excellent gaming performance.
About MSI
MSI, also known as Micro-Star International, is a Taiwanese technology corporation. MSI is known for their wide range of gaming devices. Their series include the entry-level Cyborg/Thin and Sword/Katana series, the mid-range Bravo/Delta and Crosshair/Pulse series, and their high-end Vector, Raider, Stealth, and Titan GT series. At every performance level, MSI offers a variety of devices with varying balances between performance, battery life, weight, and price, making them a solid option to consider at every price point.
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec laptops team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest laptop information and makes it digestible for you.
By the numbers
380
Laptops evaluated
48,640
Laptops stats compiled
13
Proprietary Laptops ratings developed
102,495
Recommendations made
22,208
Consumer hours saved
About the laptop team
Joe Golden, Ph.D
CEO and Laptops Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.
Jason Lew
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.
Chandradeep Chowdhury
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.
Craig Russell
Laptops Expert
Craig is a UK-based laptops expert. Craig works in IT, where he recommends and supports laptops and PCs for clients and has been recommending laptops on Reddit for five years.