Acer Swift X (2022) vs LG Gram 16

For general use, screen quality is typically judged by how clear and vibrant the display is, and both the Acer Swift X and LG Gram 16 offer sharp resolutions and bright panels, making texts and images clear and easy on the eyes. In engineering and design tasks, accurate color reproduction is critical, and these laptops provide good coverage of color gamuts, ensuring that the designs you work on are color-accurate and true to life. However, for gaming and 3D applications, a high refresh rate is crucial for smooth motion and responsiveness, which neither of these laptops prioritize, resulting in less fluid visuals in fast-paced scenarios.

Battery life estimate is based on a mix of common use patterns. More portable and higher performing laptops tend to have less battery life.

PerfectRec’s Build Quality Score incorporates case materials, display and keyboard flex, hinge quality, and overall reliability.

The Acer Swift X (2022) is good for general use because it combines a strong CPU and discrete graphics with sufficient RAM and a high-quality screen, making it capable for a range of tasks while still maintaining portability and a reasonable battery life. The LG Gram 16, with a similar powerful CPU, ample RAM, and an excellent larger screen, emphasizes extreme portability and longer battery life, but trades off with less storage capacity and integrated graphics, making it slightly less suitable for graphics-intensive tasks.

The Acer Swift X (2022) and LG Gram 16 are both "fair" for gaming and 3D because they are equipped with mid-range and integrated GPUs respectively; neither are high-end gaming GPUs that provide peak performance for demanding games and 3D applications. Additionally, both have the same 60Hz display refresh rate, which is lower than gaming-targeted laptops, possibly leading to less smooth visuals in fast-paced games and less fluidity in 3D rendering tasks.

The Acer Swift X (2022) stands out for engineering and design due to its powerful Nvidia RTX 3050 GPU, which compliments its solid CPU and RAM foundation, whereas the LG Gram 16 offers a compelling blend of portability and screen quality with its lighter build and higher screen resolution, though it sacrifices GPU power with its integrated Intel graphics for quieter running noise, making it less suited for GPU-intensive tasks compared to the Acer. While both laptops have substantial RAM and capable CPUs necessary for engineering and design software, your choice may hinge on whether you need the Acer's higher graphics capabilities for tasks like 3D modeling or prefer the LG's portability and display for less graphically demanding work.

PerfectRec’s Content Creation Score takes into account the many different features of the laptop that make it more or less suitable for photo editing, video editing and other content creation tasks.

PerfectRec’s Software Development Score takes into account the many different features of the laptop that make it more or less suitable for software developers.