If you prioritize higher performance for tasks like running intensive engineering software, 3D applications, or gaming, and don't mind spending more, the Acer Swift X is a better option, although it's less portable. In contrast, the Packard Bell Cloudbook 14" is much more budget-friendly and lightweight, making it suitable for general use like browsing and document editing, with the tradeoff being lower performance and potentially shorter battery life. Consider how you'll use the laptop most of the time to decide which tradeoffs are acceptable to you. Give Feedback
this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the Acer Swift X (2023)
Good for general use
Very good for engineering and design
Good for software development
Very good for content creation
Very good overall display quality
Good overall build quality
Very good battery life
Very good speakers
Very good keyboard
Advantages of the Packard Bell Cloudbook 14"
The Packard Bell Cloudbook 14" has no clear advantages over the Acer Swift X (2023).
Key differences
General Use
7.9/10
5.7/10
2560 x 1600
RESOLUTION
1920 x 1080
IPS
DISPLAY TECHNOLOGY
IPS
390.0 nits
DISPLAY BRIGHTNESS
200.0 nits
10.0 Hours
BATTERY LIFE
7.0 Hours
8.0/10
KEYBOARD QUALITY SCORE
4.6/10
8.2/10
PORTABILITY SCORE
8.1/10
The Acer Swift X (2023) is good for general use, while the Packard Bell Cloudbook 14" is poor.
The Acer Swift X (2023) is preferred for general use as it offers a powerful Intel i5 processor, ample 16GB of RAM, and a high-quality display, along with a solid build and excellent heat management, ensuring smooth performance and good visuals. On the other hand, the Packard Bell Cloudbook 14" has a basic Intel Celeron processor, lower 4GB of RAM, and a lower-resolution screen which, together with subpar build quality and poor keyboard, makes it less suitable for demanding tasks and extended use.
Gaming and AI
6.9/10
5.5/10
5.1/10
OVERALL GPU SCORE
3.5/10
2560 x 1600
RESOLUTION
1920 x 1080
120Hz
REFRESH RATE
60Hz
Yes
SUPPORTS DLSS
No
No
MUX SWITCH / ADVANCED OPTIMUS
No
8.0/10
FAN NOISE SCORE
8.7/10
The Acer Swift X (2023) is only fair for gaming and AI, while the Packard Bell Cloudbook 14" is poor.
The Acer Swift X (2023) is apt for gaming and 3D applications due to its powerful Nvidia RTX 3050 graphics card and higher screen refresh rate of 120 Hz, which allow for more fluid visuals and better handling of graphic-intensive tasks. In contrast, the Packard Bell Cloudbook 14" falters in performance for such tasks with its modest Intel UHD Graphics 600 and a lower screen refresh rate of 60 Hz, which are not suited for high-graphics gaming and 3D environments.
Engineering and Design
8.0/10
5.5/10
8.5/10
OVERALL CPU SCORE
3.3/10
5.1/10
OVERALL GPU SCORE
3.5/10
16.0 GB
RAM
4.0 GB
The Acer Swift X (2023) is very good for engineering and design, while the Packard Bell Cloudbook 14" is poor.
The Acer Swift X (2023) is better suited for engineering and design because it has a more powerful CPU, significantly more RAM, a higher-quality GPU, and a superior screen with better resolution, color accuracy, and brightness. In contrast, the Packard Bell Cloudbook 14" has a much less capable CPU and GPU, less RAM, and a lower-quality screen, making it less suitable for demanding engineering and design tasks.
Content Creation
8.0/10
5.9/10
8.5/10
OVERALL CPU SCORE
3.3/10
2560 x 1600
RESOLUTION
1920 x 1080
16.0 GB
RAM
4.0 GB
IPS
DISPLAY TECHNOLOGY
IPS
The Acer Swift X (2023) is very good for content creation, while the Packard Bell Cloudbook 14" is poor.
PerfectRec’s Content Creation Score takes into account the many different features of the laptop that make it more or less suitable for photo editing, video editing and other content creation tasks.
Software Development
7.9/10
5.9/10
8.5/10
OVERALL CPU SCORE
3.3/10
16.0 GB
RAM
4.0 GB
2560 x 1600
RESOLUTION
1920 x 1080
8.0/10
KEYBOARD QUALITY SCORE
4.6/10
The Acer Swift X (2023) is good for software development, while the Packard Bell Cloudbook 14" is poor.
PerfectRec’s Software Development Score takes into account the many different features of the laptop that make it more or less suitable for software developers.
Screen Quality
8.0/10
5.8/10
14.5in
SIZE
14.1in
2560 x 1600
RESOLUTION
1920 x 1080
IPS
DISPLAY TECHNOLOGY
IPS
120Hz
REFRESH RATE
60Hz
390.0 nits
BRIGHTNESS
200.0 nits
The Acer Swift X has a better screen than the Packard Bell Cloudbook 14 for general use, gaming and AI, engineering and design, software development, and content creation.
For general use, the Acer Swift X stands out with a clearer, brighter display and sharper image quality, making it superior to the Packard Bell Cloudbook, which has a dimmer and lower resolution screen that may strain the eyes over time. In engineering and design, color accuracy is crucial; thus, the Acer's broader color gamut ensures that designers see more accurate and vivid colors, whereas the Cloudbook's limited range can lead to less precise color representation. When it comes to gaming and 3D applications, the Swift X's lower refresh rate can cause motion blur or not feel as fluid, whereas the refresh rate is less of a concern for the Cloudbook since its overall poor screen quality is already a limiting factor for such demanding tasks.
Battery
10.0 Hours
7.0 Hours
The Acer Swift X has 10 hours of battery life. The Packard Bell Cloudbook 14 has 7 hours of battery life.
Battery life estimate is based on a mix of common use patterns. More portable and higher performing laptops tend to have less battery life.
Build Quality
7.6/10
5.1/10
The Acer Swift X (2023) has good build quality, while the Packard Bell Cloudbook 14" has poor build quality.
PerfectRec’s Build Quality Score incorporates case materials, display and keyboard flex, hinge quality, and overall reliability.
Cost
$1,100
$350
$0
$500
$1,000
$1,500
$2,000
The Acer Swift X (2023) has a price of $1,100 and the Packard Bell Cloudbook 14" costs $350.
"The Swift X is an Acer for entry-level gaming. With the entry-level graphics chip, our Acer not only beats every single current AMD and Intel iGPU, but also Intel's dGPU Iris Xe Max. However, despite being a GDDR6 version, the GTX does not match the expectations set by its own counterparts from our database. This may be a result of the single fan, which only produces moderate noise levels under load. The performance level of the thin and light 1.4 kg (~3.09 lbs) 14-inch laptop is impressive nonetheless."
Get a great deal on the Acer Swift X (2023) or the Packard Bell Cloudbook 14"
About Acer
Acer is a prominent Taiwanese electronics brand which makes a wide range of laptops, with multiple product lines catering to personal use, gaming, and business use. They are renowned for having exceptional value for money, as they frequently offer good specifications at a lower price than other manufacturers.
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec laptops team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest laptop information and makes it digestible for you.
By the numbers
380
Laptops evaluated
48,640
Laptops stats compiled
13
Proprietary Laptops ratings developed
131,895
Recommendations made
28,578
Consumer hours saved
About the laptop team
Joe Golden, Ph.D
CEO and Laptops Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.
Jason Lew
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.
Chandradeep Chowdhury
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.
Craig Russell
Laptops Expert
Craig is a UK-based laptops expert. Craig works in IT, where he recommends and supports laptops and PCs for clients and has been recommending laptops on Reddit for five years.