Acer Swift X (2023) vs ASUS ROG Strix Scar 17

The Acer Swift X (2023) is good for gaming and 3D applications due to its Nvidia RTX 3050 graphics card and a screen refresh rate of 120; however, the ASUS ROG Strix Scar 17 offers higher performance in the same use cases attributing to a superior Nvidia RTX 3070 Ti GPU and a higher refresh rate of 360, which provides smoother visuals and enhanced gaming experience. The ASUS ROG Strix Scar 17 also benefits from a more powerful CPU, but the Swift X's higher screen resolution may offer better screen quality for detailed work despite a lower refresh rate.

The ASUS ROG Strix Scar 17 is more suited for demanding engineering and design tasks with its higher-end CPU and more powerful GPU, ensuring smoother handling of complex software; however, it's heavier and less portable compared to the Acer Swift X, which offers respectable performance for engineering with a capable processor and GPU but prioritizes a balance between power and portability. While both laptops have high-quality screens, the Strix Scar 17's larger size and higher refresh rate may be more advantageous for design work, even as the Swift X offers a higher resolution and better color accuracy, which might make it more appealing for certain engineering applications.

When considering screen quality for general use, the Acer Swift X stands out due to its higher resolution and brightness, making images and text crisper and more vibrant, whereas the ASUS ROG Strix Scar 17, while still good, may not be as bright or as sharp. For engineering and design, the Acer Swift X likely offers wider color gamuts, which ensures more accurate color reproduction, a necessity for precision work, whereas the ASUS may have good color coverage but not to the same extent. However, in terms of 3D applications, the ASUS might be at a disadvantage because it may lack the high refresh rate that is critical for smooth rendering of fast-moving images, something the Acer also doesn't excel in, thus both may not be optimal for high-end gaming or complex 3D work despite their other strengths.

Battery life estimate is based on a mix of common use patterns. More portable and higher performing laptops tend to have less battery life.

PerfectRec’s Build Quality Score incorporates case materials, display and keyboard flex, hinge quality, and overall reliability.

The Acer Swift X is praised for its balance of portability and performance, with a lightweight design, longer battery life, and a CPU and RAM setup fit for general tasks. Meanwhile, the ASUS ROG Strix Scar 17 offers superior CPU, screen size, and storage, catering well to intensive applications, but it sacrifices portability and battery life due to its heavier build and more power-hungry components.

PerfectRec’s Content Creation Score takes into account the many different features of the laptop that make it more or less suitable for photo editing, video editing and other content creation tasks.

PerfectRec’s Software Development Score takes into account the many different features of the laptop that make it more or less suitable for software developers.