Acer Swift Go 14 vs HP EliteBook 845 G9

For general use, both the Acer Swift Go 14 and the HP EliteBook 845 G9 have panels with sufficient resolution and brightness, making them suitable for everyday tasks like browsing and video streaming. In engineering and design, their color accuracy is beneficial for working with detailed visuals and designs, although they might lack the full spectrum coverage that professional grade monitors offer. However, their refresh rates are lower than gaming-oriented laptops, which limits their ability to smoothly render fast-moving images, making them less ideal for gaming and high-end 3D applications.

Battery life estimate is based on a mix of common use patterns. More portable and higher performing laptops tend to have less battery life.

PerfectRec’s Build Quality Score incorporates case materials, display and keyboard flex, hinge quality, and overall reliability.

The Acer Swift Go 14 offers a balance of performance for general use featuring an Intel i7 processor with integrated graphics, ample RAM, and an IPS screen with good color coverage, complemented by its lightweight design and good battery life, making it highly portable. In contrast, the HP EliteBook 845 G9, although slightly heavier, provides a strong AMD Ryzen CPU and higher screen brightness with slightly better battery life, alongside robust build quality and good heat management, which suits professionals seeking a durable machine for daily tasks. Both laptops come with sound storage capacity, comfortable keyboards, and effective speakers, but trade-offs between the Acer's portability and the HP's endurance should be considered.

The Acer Swift Go 14 and the HP EliteBook 845 G9 are only fair for gaming and 3D because their integrated graphics, Intel Iris Xe and AMD Radeon 660M respectively, are not as powerful as dedicated gaming GPUs, plus both laptops have screens with a standard refresh rate of 60Hz which is lower than the higher refresh rates preferred for smooth gaming. While both CPUs can handle general tasks well, and their IPS screens deliver decent image quality, the lack of a dedicated high-performance GPU and a higher refresh rate means gaming and 3D applications won't perform optimally on either machine.

PerfectRec’s Engineering and Design Score takes into account the many different features of the laptop that make it more or less suitable for graphic design and 3D rendering work.

PerfectRec’s Content Creation Score takes into account the many different features of the laptop that make it more or less suitable for photo editing, video editing and other content creation tasks.

PerfectRec’s Software Development Score takes into account the many different features of the laptop that make it more or less suitable for software developers.