The Acer Swift Go 14 offers a lower upfront cost, light weight, and longer battery life, which makes it a strong choice for general use and good portability. However, the Gigabyte Aero 17, while more expensive and heavier, provides significantly higher performance for 3D rendering, machine learning, and intensive engineering tasks due to its powerful processor and high-end graphics card. The Aero 17 also has a larger, higher resolution display that’s better for color-intensive work and multimedia, but its higher weight and larger size reduce portability. If your priority is performance for demanding tasks and a top-tier display, the Aero 17 is recommended, but for day-to-day tasks and ease of carrying around, the Swift Go 14 is the better option. Give Feedback
this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the Acer Swift Go 14
Excellent portability
Good battery life
Advantages of the Gigabyte Aero 17
Very good for general use
Very good for engineering and design
Good for gaming and AI
Very good for content creation
Excellent overall display quality
Very good overall build quality
Good speakers
Key differences
Gaming and AI
6.4/10
7.9/10
3.7/10
OVERALL GPU SCORE
7.8/10
1920 x 1200
RESOLUTION
3840 x 2160
60Hz
REFRESH RATE
120Hz
No
SUPPORTS DLSS
Yes
No
MUX SWITCH / ADVANCED OPTIMUS
No
8.7/10
FAN NOISE SCORE
6.5/10
The Gigabyte Aero 17 is good for gaming and AI, while the Acer Swift Go 14 is only fair.
The Acer Swift Go 14 has an integrated GPU and a standard screen refresh rate, which constrains its gaming and 3D performance, whereas the Gigabyte Aero 17 is equipped with a high-performance Nvidia dedicated GPU and offers a higher screen refresh rate, making it more suited for demanding gaming and 3D applications. Despite their similar CPUs and good screen quality, the Aero's superior graphics capabilities and refresh rate are the primary reasons for its enhanced gaming and 3D performance.
Engineering and Design
7.2/10
8.8/10
7.4/10
OVERALL CPU SCORE
9.1/10
3.7/10
OVERALL GPU SCORE
7.8/10
16.0 GB
RAM
16.0 GB
The Gigabyte Aero 17 is very good for engineering and design, while the Acer Swift Go 14 is good.
The Gigabyte Aero 17 is ideal for engineering and design work due to its high-performance CPU, ample RAM paired with a powerful GPU, and a superior screen quality including Mini LED display with a higher resolution and refresh rate, contributing to precise visual detail necessary for such tasks. In contrast, the Acer Swift Go 14, while suitable for engineering and design due to its capable processor and sufficient RAM and GPU, compromises on screen quality and performance in favor of enhanced portability and reduced weight.
Content Creation
7.6/10
8.4/10
7.4/10
OVERALL CPU SCORE
9.1/10
1920 x 1200
RESOLUTION
3840 x 2160
16.0 GB
RAM
16.0 GB
IPS
DISPLAY TECHNOLOGY
Mini LED
The Gigabyte Aero 17 is very good for content creation, while the Acer Swift Go 14 is good.
PerfectRec’s Content Creation Score takes into account the many different features of the laptop that make it more or less suitable for photo editing, video editing and other content creation tasks.
Screen Quality
6.8/10
9.2/10
14.0in
SIZE
17.3in
1920 x 1200
RESOLUTION
3840 x 2160
IPS
DISPLAY TECHNOLOGY
Mini LED
60Hz
REFRESH RATE
120Hz
300.0 nits
BRIGHTNESS
368.0 nits
The Gigabyte Aero 17 has a better screen than the Acer Swift Go 14 for general use, gaming and AI, engineering and design, content creation, and software development.
The Acer Swift Go 14 offers adequate resolution and brightness suitable for everyday tasks like browsing and video calls but may lack the advanced color range designers need and the high refresh rate required for smooth 3D rendering. The Gigabyte Aero 17, with its superior color accuracy covering wide color gamuts, excels for tasks demanding precise hues in engineering and design, while its high resolution ensures crisp imagery, although its lower refresh rate isn't optimal for fast-paced 3D applications. Overall, the Swift Go 14 is sufficient for casual users, whereas the Aero 17 is geared towards professionals in creative fields, at the expense of gaming enthusiasts.
Battery
8.0 Hours
5.5 Hours
The Acer Swift Go 14 has 8 hours of battery life. The Gigabyte Aero 17 has 5.5 hours of battery life.
Battery life estimate is based on a mix of common use patterns. More portable and higher performing laptops tend to have less battery life.
Portability
Excellent
Fair
14.0in
SIZE
17.3in
2.7 lbs
WEIGHT
5.7 lbs
0.5in
THICKNESS
0.9in
The Acer Swift Go 14 has excellent portability, while the Gigabyte Aero 17 has only fair portability.
The most portable laptops are small, thin, and light.
Build Quality
7.4/10
8.0/10
The Gigabyte Aero 17 has very good build quality, while the Acer Swift Go 14 has good build quality.
PerfectRec’s Build Quality Score incorporates case materials, display and keyboard flex, hinge quality, and overall reliability.
Cost
$793
$2,071
$0
$500
$1,000
$1,500
$2,000
$2,500
$3,000
$3,500
The Acer Swift Go 14 has a price of $793 and the Gigabyte Aero 17 costs $2,071.
Although they have very similar scores, PerfectRec considers Gigabyte Aero 17 to be very good for general use, while the Acer Swift Go 14 is good.
The Acer Swift Go 14 excels in general use due to its lightweight design, solid CPU and RAM for multitasking, and better battery life, which is enhanced by its efficient screen and size, making it highly portable. In contrast, the Gigabyte Aero 17 offers outstanding screen quality and performance from its superior CPU and dedicated graphics card, suited for more demanding applications, but it sacrifices some portability and battery life due to its larger, power-intensive display and components.
Software Development
7.6/10
7.9/10
7.4/10
OVERALL CPU SCORE
9.1/10
16.0 GB
RAM
16.0 GB
1920 x 1200
RESOLUTION
3840 x 2160
8.0/10
KEYBOARD QUALITY SCORE
8.5/10
The Gigabyte Aero 17 and Acer Swift Go 14 are both good for software development.
PerfectRec’s Software Development Score takes into account the many different features of the laptop that make it more or less suitable for software developers.
Give feedback
We’re constantly working to improve.
How the Acer Swift Go 14 and the Gigabyte Aero 17 compare to other laptops
"The Acer Swift Go 14 is a surprising machine. Its performance, display, and battery life leave little to be desired from a device at this price. You might think it’d be cheaper given the “Go” in the name, or thinner given its close competition with thin-and-light laptops, but it manages to strike a decent enough balance between its capabilities and hardware to really stand out as an exceptional value."
"Not only is the Aero 17 a very good laptop for gamers but also for content creators. With the upgrade to the Intel Core i9-11980HK, Gigabyte particularly improved the system performance. In addition, the hardware package is rounded by the extremely fast SSD and 32 GB of working memory in dual-channel mode. Compared to the predecessor, the battery life is reduced only moderately, and the 4K display also basically keeps its good qualities."
Get a great deal on the Acer Swift Go 14 or the Gigabyte Aero 17
About Acer
Acer is a prominent Taiwanese electronics brand which makes a wide range of laptops, with multiple product lines catering to personal use, gaming, and business use. They are renowned for having exceptional value for money, as they frequently offer good specifications at a lower price than other manufacturers.
About Gigabyte
Gigabyte is a Taiwanese computer hardware manufacturer. While Gigabyte mainly focuses its business on desktop hardware, Gigabyte is known for its value-oriented G series laptops, thin and light Aero series, and performance-oriented Aorus series. Gigabyte laptops offer a strong value proposition to compete with mainstream alternatives.
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec laptops team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest laptop information and makes it digestible for you.
By the numbers
380
Laptops evaluated
48,640
Laptops stats compiled
13
Proprietary Laptops ratings developed
131,595
Recommendations made
28,513
Consumer hours saved
About the laptop team
Joe Golden, Ph.D
CEO and Laptops Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.
Jason Lew
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.
Chandradeep Chowdhury
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.
Craig Russell
Laptops Expert
Craig is a UK-based laptops expert. Craig works in IT, where he recommends and supports laptops and PCs for clients and has been recommending laptops on Reddit for five years.