The Acer Swift 3 offers a budget-friendly option with adequate performance for general use, good battery life, and reasonable portability, making it suitable for everyday tasks and light engineering work. On the other hand, the Razer Blade 15 is significantly more expensive, provides powerful performance for 3D rendering, machine learning, and intensive gaming due to its high-end graphics card and processor, and has a high-resolution screen with excellent color coverage, but it is heavier and has a shorter battery life, making it less portable. If budget is a constraint and your use is mainly for general tasks with some occasional demanding applications, the Acer Swift 3 could be the better choice. If performance in graphics-intensive tasks is a priority and you're willing to invest more, the Razer Blade 15 is appropriate despite its portability tradeoff. Give Feedback
this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the Acer Swift 3
Very good portability
Very good battery life
Advantages of the Razer Blade 15
Very good for engineering and design
Very good for gaming and AI
Very good for content creation
Very good overall display quality
Very good overall build quality
Very good speakers
Excellent keyboard
Key differences
Gaming and AI
6.3/10
8.0/10
3.7/10
OVERALL GPU SCORE
8.0/10
1920 x 1080
RESOLUTION
2560 x 1440
60Hz
REFRESH RATE
240Hz
No
SUPPORTS DLSS
Yes
No
MUX SWITCH / ADVANCED OPTIMUS
Yes
8.7/10
FAN NOISE SCORE
7.0/10
The Razer Blade 15 is very good for gaming and AI, while the Acer Swift 3 is only fair.
The Razer Blade 15, with its Nvidia RTX 3070 Ti graphics card and a screen refresh rate of up to 240, is better suited for gaming and 3D tasks compared to the Acer Swift 3 which has an Intel i5-1240P Iris Xe GPU and tops out at a 60 refresh rate. While both models share similar CPU performance and screen quality, the superior GPU and higher refresh rate of the Razer Blade 15 are what make it stand out for those specific demands.
Engineering and Design
7.1/10
8.5/10
7.1/10
OVERALL CPU SCORE
9.0/10
3.7/10
OVERALL GPU SCORE
8.0/10
16.0 GB
RAM
16.0 GB
The Razer Blade 15 is very good for engineering and design, while the Acer Swift 3 is good.
The Razer Blade 15 outshines the Acer Swift 3 for engineering and design use primarily due to its stronger CPU, superior graphics card, and higher quality, higher resolution screen, which are crucial for intensive tasks and detailed work. While both have the same amount of RAM, which is important for multitasking and complex projects, the Acer Swift 3 offers better portability and less operating noise, but those factors are less critical for the performance demands of engineering and design.
Screen Quality
6.8/10
8.2/10
14.0in
SIZE
15.6in
1920 x 1080
RESOLUTION
2560 x 1440
IPS
DISPLAY TECHNOLOGY
IPS
60Hz
REFRESH RATE
240Hz
309.0 nits
BRIGHTNESS
271.0 nits
The Razer Blade 15 has a better screen than the Acer Swift 3 for general use, gaming and AI, engineering and design, and software development.
The Acer Swift 3's panel offers clear images and ample brightness for documents and browsing, but lacks the high color accuracy engineers and designers need, and its modest refresh rate dims its appeal for 3D applications. The Razer Blade 15 shines with vibrant and precise color representation vital for engineering and design tasks, and a good display for everyday tasks, yet for gaming and 3D, despite its quality, it falls short due to limited refresh rates. Both laptops cater well to general use and professional design work, but serious gamers or 3D artists should consider models with faster screen refresh rates to ensure smoother visuals.
Battery
12.0 Hours
5.0 Hours
The Acer Swift 3 has 12 hours of battery life. The Razer Blade 15 has 5 hours of battery life.
Battery life estimate is based on a mix of common use patterns. More portable and higher performing laptops tend to have less battery life.
Portability
Very Good
Good
14.0in
SIZE
15.6in
2.7 lbs
WEIGHT
4.4 lbs
0.6in
THICKNESS
0.6in
The Acer Swift 3 has very good portability, while the Razer Blade 15 has good portability.
The most portable laptops are small, thin, and light.
Build Quality
7.4/10
8.5/10
The Razer Blade 15 has very good build quality, while the Acer Swift 3 has good build quality.
PerfectRec’s Build Quality Score incorporates case materials, display and keyboard flex, hinge quality, and overall reliability.
Cost
$500
$2,500
$0
$1,000
$2,000
$3,000
$4,000
The Acer Swift 3 has a price of $500 and the Razer Blade 15 costs $2,500.
The Razer Blade 15 and Acer Swift 3 are both good for general use.
The Acer Swift 3 features a solid processor and ample RAM for smooth multitasking, an IPS touch screen with good color coverage for pleasant visuals, and boasts a light design combined with long battery life, making it well suited for on-the-go general use.
Content Creation
7.6/10
8.0/10
7.1/10
OVERALL CPU SCORE
9.0/10
1920 x 1080
RESOLUTION
2560 x 1440
16.0 GB
RAM
16.0 GB
IPS
DISPLAY TECHNOLOGY
IPS
Although they have very similar scores, PerfectRec considers Razer Blade 15 to be very good for content creation, while the Acer Swift 3 is good.
PerfectRec’s Content Creation Score takes into account the many different features of the laptop that make it more or less suitable for photo editing, video editing and other content creation tasks.
Software Development
7.6/10
7.7/10
7.1/10
OVERALL CPU SCORE
9.0/10
16.0 GB
RAM
16.0 GB
1920 x 1080
RESOLUTION
2560 x 1440
7.0/10
KEYBOARD QUALITY SCORE
9.0/10
The Razer Blade 15 and Acer Swift 3 are both good for software development.
PerfectRec’s Software Development Score takes into account the many different features of the laptop that make it more or less suitable for software developers.
Give feedback
We’re constantly working to improve.
How the Acer Swift 3 and the Razer Blade 15 compare to other laptops
"With the Swift 3, Acer delivers a 14-inch laptop with a sleek, slim metal chassis. The latter is of high quality and sturdy enough for everyday use, which is a real plus point among the 700-Euro (~$798) models. A new feature is Thunderbolt 4 in the Type-C format for peripherals or even displays (DisplayPort via Type-C). Unfortunately, a card reader is still missing, and the RAM is completely onboard, so there are no upgrade options here. Acer's 14-incher is affordable, yet it does everything most would want from a truly mobile laptop: Long battery life, a great display, quality, sufficient ports, light weight, and low noise and heat emissions."
"The 2022 Blade 15 offers roughly 15 to 25 percent faster graphics performance and 20 percent faster CPU performance over last year's Core i7-11800H and RTX 3080 model. Thankfully, the system doesn't need to run noticeably louder or warmer to achieve faster results, but both power consumption and battery life take a hit. The higher consumption in particular appears to be a trend amongst many 12th gen Core laptops including the Schenker Uniwill Technology GM7AG8P or MSI Vector GP66 when compared to their previous generation counterparts. We're also glad to not see below-average CPU performance which was the case for the 10th gen Core i7-10875H model."
Get a great deal on the Acer Swift 3 or the Razer Blade 15
About Acer
Acer is a prominent Taiwanese electronics brand which makes a wide range of laptops, with multiple product lines catering to personal use, gaming, and business use. They are renowned for having exceptional value for money, as they frequently offer good specifications at a lower price than other manufacturers.
About Razer
Razer is an American-Singaporean technology company. Razer is best known for their Blade series laptops, well known for their strong performance and sleek design. Although Razer charges a premium price tag for their laptops, buyers can expect a stealthy laptop with clean fit and finish and strong performance. All of their models offer great portability and build quality compared to other gaming laptops.
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec laptops team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest laptop information and makes it digestible for you.
By the numbers
380
Laptops evaluated
48,640
Laptops stats compiled
13
Proprietary Laptops ratings developed
131,295
Recommendations made
28,448
Consumer hours saved
About the laptop team
Joe Golden, Ph.D
CEO and Laptops Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.
Jason Lew
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.
Chandradeep Chowdhury
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.
Craig Russell
Laptops Expert
Craig is a UK-based laptops expert. Craig works in IT, where he recommends and supports laptops and PCs for clients and has been recommending laptops on Reddit for five years.