Acer Swift 3 vs ASUS TUF Dash 15

The Acer Swift 3 has an integrated graphics unit, less suited for gaming and 3D tasks, and a standard refresh rate screen, which is not as smooth for fast-paced scenes as higher refresh rates. In contrast, the ASUS TUF Dash 15 comes equipped with a dedicated Nvidia graphics card well-known for better gaming and 3D performance, and a high refresh rate screen for a more fluid visual experience.

The Acer Swift 3, with its Intel CPU and integrated graphics, is well-suited for engineering tasks where portability and screen touch capability are beneficial, while the ASUS TUF Dash 15 offers a higher performance Intel CPU and dedicated Nvidia GPU ideal for more demanding engineering and design software that requires better graphics handling. The Swift 3 has a higher screen brightness and color coverage which can be crucial for design work, but the TUF Dash 15 compensates with a far superior contrast ratio and refresh rate, making it better for tasks where visual fidelity and fluid motion are key.

For general use, both the Acer Swift 3 and the ASUS TUF Dash 15 have screens that deliver sharp images and vibrant colors thanks to their resolution and panel technology, providing an enjoyable viewing experience for everyday tasks like browsing and video streaming. For engineering and design work, where accurate color representation is critical, both laptops' screens cover a broad range of color gamuts, ensuring that designers can expect reliable color fidelity in their projects. However, gamers and 3D artists may find the screens lacking due to lower refresh rates, meaning less fluid motion and slower response times, which are crucial in fast-paced gaming and smooth 3D rendering.

Battery life estimate is based on a mix of common use patterns. More portable and higher performing laptops tend to have less battery life.

The Acer Swift 3 provides a balance for general use with its lightweight design, respectable battery life, and full HD touchscreen, which contribute to its very good portability and screen quality, complemented by capable CPU and sufficient RAM; however, its speaker and build quality are just good, and it lacks a dedicated GPU for intensive tasks. The ASUS TUF Dash 15, on the other hand, offers a powerful CPU with a high-end GPU suitable for demanding applications and gaming, has a high-refresh-rate screen, but is heavier and has less battery life, making it less portable, while maintaining good levels of keyboard, speaker quality, and heat management.

PerfectRec’s Content Creation Score takes into account the many different features of the laptop that make it more or less suitable for photo editing, video editing and other content creation tasks.

PerfectRec’s Software Development Score takes into account the many different features of the laptop that make it more or less suitable for software developers.

PerfectRec’s Build Quality Score incorporates case materials, display and keyboard flex, hinge quality, and overall reliability.