When deciding between the Acer Nitro 17 and the Razer Blade 18, consider that the Acer Nitro 17 might give you more value for money with respectable performance for general use and mid-tier gaming. However, the Razer Blade 18 is typically more expensive due to its premium build, slim design, and likely higher performance, which can be crucial for heavy gaming, 3D rendering, or computational tasks. Expect the Razer to have a stronger graphics card and possibly better display quality, but at the expense of higher cost and potentially shorter battery life. The Acer may have a longer battery life and be more cost-effective, but with tradeoffs in performance and build quality. Thus, if budget is a major concern and your tasks aren't overly demanding, the Acer Nitro 17 could be the better choice, whereas if you require top-notch performance and a sleeker design, and are willing to invest more, the Razer Blade 18 may be preferable. Give Feedback
this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the Acer Nitro 17
Good battery life
Advantages of the Razer Blade 18
Very good for general use
Excellent for engineering and design
Very good for gaming and AI
Very good for software development
Very good for content creation
Very good overall display quality
Very good overall build quality
Best in class speakers
Excellent keyboard
Key differences
General Use
7.8/10
8.5/10
1920 x 1080
RESOLUTION
2560 x 1600
IPS
DISPLAY TECHNOLOGY
IPS
280.0 nits
DISPLAY BRIGHTNESS
524.0 nits
8.0 Hours
BATTERY LIFE
4.0 Hours
7.0/10
KEYBOARD QUALITY SCORE
9.0/10
5.5/10
PORTABILITY SCORE
6.1/10
The Razer Blade 18 is very good for general use, while the Acer Nitro 17 is good.
The Razer Blade 18 offers a superior experience for general use with its higher RAM, which improves multitasking, and its screen that boasts a better resolution and color accuracy compared to the Acer Nitro 17, thus enhancing visual tasks. These advantages, however, are set against the Razer Blade's lower portability due to its larger screen size and shorter battery life relative to the Acer Nitro 17, which may be more appealing for users seeking mobility and longer use away from a power source.
Gaming and AI
7.4/10
8.9/10
7.3/10
OVERALL GPU SCORE
8.9/10
1920 x 1080
RESOLUTION
2560 x 1600
165Hz
REFRESH RATE
240Hz
Yes
SUPPORTS DLSS
Yes
Yes
MUX SWITCH / ADVANCED OPTIMUS
Yes
6.7/10
FAN NOISE SCORE
7.2/10
The Razer Blade 18 is very good for gaming and AI, while the Acer Nitro 17 is good.
The Razer Blade 18 is excellent for gaming and 3D because it comes with a more powerful Nvidia RTX 4070 GPU and a higher screen refresh rate of 240, which makes for smoother visuals and gameplay. The Acer Nitro 17, while good for gaming and 3D, has a less powerful RTX 4050 GPU and a lower refresh rate at 165, meaning it won't perform as well in the most demanding situations.
Engineering and Design
7.9/10
9.3/10
7.9/10
OVERALL CPU SCORE
9.9/10
7.3/10
OVERALL GPU SCORE
8.9/10
16.0 GB
RAM
32.0 GB
The Razer Blade 18 is excellent for engineering and design, while the Acer Nitro 17 is good.
The Razer Blade 18 stands out for engineering and design use with its more powerful CPU, increased RAM capacity, and higher-end GPU, resulting in excellent performance for demanding tasks, and a superior screen with higher resolution and brightness. In contrast, while the Acer Nitro 17 also has commendable specifications, including a capable CPU and GPU for engineering work, its screen quality and half the RAM of the Razer make it less optimal for highly intensive work, though it may offer better portability and battery life.
Content Creation
7.8/10
8.6/10
7.9/10
OVERALL CPU SCORE
9.9/10
1920 x 1080
RESOLUTION
2560 x 1600
16.0 GB
RAM
32.0 GB
IPS
DISPLAY TECHNOLOGY
IPS
The Razer Blade 18 is very good for content creation, while the Acer Nitro 17 is good.
PerfectRec’s Content Creation Score takes into account the many different features of the laptop that make it more or less suitable for photo editing, video editing and other content creation tasks.
Software Development
7.4/10
8.5/10
7.9/10
OVERALL CPU SCORE
9.9/10
16.0 GB
RAM
32.0 GB
1920 x 1080
RESOLUTION
2560 x 1600
7.0/10
KEYBOARD QUALITY SCORE
9.0/10
The Razer Blade 18 is very good for software development, while the Acer Nitro 17 is good.
PerfectRec’s Software Development Score takes into account the many different features of the laptop that make it more or less suitable for software developers.
Screen Quality
7.4/10
8.9/10
17.3in
SIZE
18.0in
1920 x 1080
RESOLUTION
2560 x 1600
IPS
DISPLAY TECHNOLOGY
IPS
165Hz
REFRESH RATE
240Hz
280.0 nits
BRIGHTNESS
524.0 nits
The Razer Blade 18 has a better screen than the Acer Nitro 17 for general use, gaming and AI, engineering and design, content creation, and software development.
For general use, the Acer Nitro 17 and Razer Blade 18 both offer clarity and vibrancy due to their high-resolution displays and brightness, but the Razer Blade 18 steps up with a sharper image. When it comes to engineering and design, both laptops have color accuracy that caters to detail-oriented work, with the Razer Blade 18 likely delivering a wider color range, making it superior for tasks requiring precise color representation. However, for gaming and 3D, the lower refresh rates on both screens limit the fluidity of motion graphics, which is crucial for an immersive experience, making them less ideal for these particular activities.
Battery
8.0 Hours
4.0 Hours
The Acer Nitro 17 has 8 hours of battery life. The Razer Blade 18 has 4 hours of battery life.
Battery life estimate is based on a mix of common use patterns. More portable and higher performing laptops tend to have less battery life.
Portability
Poor
Fair
17.3in
SIZE
18.0in
6.8 lbs
WEIGHT
6.6 lbs
1.1in
THICKNESS
0.8in
The Razer Blade 18 has only fair portability, while the Acer Nitro 17 has poor portability.
The most portable laptops are small, thin, and light.
Build Quality
7.4/10
8.5/10
The Razer Blade 18 has very good build quality, while the Acer Nitro 17 has good build quality.
PerfectRec’s Build Quality Score incorporates case materials, display and keyboard flex, hinge quality, and overall reliability.
Cost
$970
$10
$0
$500
$1,000
$1,500
$2,000
The Acer Nitro 17 has a price of $970 and the Razer Blade 18 costs $10.
"The Acer Nitro 17 isn't an exceptional gaming laptop; it's kind of chunky even among 17.3-inch notebooks, with a lackluster keyboard, and it doesn't outperform comparably priced machines. But there's a lot to like about it, including a good array of ports, a screen that's sharp and bright for work and play alike, and battery life that soundly beats the competition. All this comes at an affordable price. If size and weight aren't big concerns, you'll find the Nitro 17 a dependable big-screen gaming rig. If you crave higher quality, consider a slight step down or up in screen size with the Lenovo Legion Slim 5 Gen 8 or Alienware m18 respectively."
"Razer made a powerful laptop in the Blade 18, showing off a beautiful and fast display and the same high-quality build we’ve come to expect from this product line. It’s also quite expensive, which is hardly a surprise, but bears repeating even in this price range. It’s pricier than the Scar 18 despite an inferior GPU and half the storage, so you really have to want the Blade 18’s design to justify the cost."
Get a great deal on the Acer Nitro 17 or the Razer Blade 18
About Acer
Acer is a prominent Taiwanese electronics brand which makes a wide range of laptops, with multiple product lines catering to personal use, gaming, and business use. They are renowned for having exceptional value for money, as they frequently offer good specifications at a lower price than other manufacturers.
About Razer
Razer is an American-Singaporean technology company. Razer is best known for their Blade series laptops, well known for their strong performance and sleek design. Although Razer charges a premium price tag for their laptops, buyers can expect a stealthy laptop with clean fit and finish and strong performance. All of their models offer great portability and build quality compared to other gaming laptops.
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec laptops team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest laptop information and makes it digestible for you.
By the numbers
380
Laptops evaluated
48,640
Laptops stats compiled
13
Proprietary Laptops ratings developed
110,895
Recommendations made
24,028
Consumer hours saved
About the laptop team
Joe Golden, Ph.D
CEO and Laptops Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.
Jason Lew
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.
Chandradeep Chowdhury
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.
Craig Russell
Laptops Expert
Craig is a UK-based laptops expert. Craig works in IT, where he recommends and supports laptops and PCs for clients and has been recommending laptops on Reddit for five years.