Since you're looking at both the Acer Nitro 16 and the MSI Thin GF63, you're likely interested in the balance between cost and performance, especially for gaming or intensive tasks. The Acer Nitro 16 generally commands a higher price, likely due to better performance or additional features that enhance gaming or high-demand applications. It may have a more powerful processor, superior graphics, a higher-quality display, or better cooling system, which justify its price for those who need that extra edge in performance. On the other hand, if you're looking for a more budget-friendly option that can handle everyday tasks and some light gaming, the MSI Thin GF63 offers portability and decent performance for its price point but may not fare as well with more demanding software or games. If you travel frequently or simply prefer a lighter laptop, the MSI may also appeal to you for its portability aspect. Ultimately, if you are willing to invest more for higher performance, especially for gaming or creative work, the Acer Nitro 16 is a strong choice, but if you need a more affordable, portable laptop for general use, the MSI Thin GF63 could be the way to go. Give Feedback
this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the Acer Nitro 16
Very good for engineering and design
Very good for gaming and AI
Very good overall display quality
Good overall build quality
Good battery life
Good speakers
Very good keyboard
Advantages of the MSI Thin GF63
Good portability
Key differences
Gaming and AI
8.0/10
6.9/10
8.9/10
OVERALL GPU SCORE
5.6/10
2560 x 1600
RESOLUTION
1920 x 1080
165Hz
REFRESH RATE
144Hz
Yes
SUPPORTS DLSS
Yes
Yes
MUX SWITCH / ADVANCED OPTIMUS
No
7.0/10
FAN NOISE SCORE
8.0/10
The Acer Nitro 16 is very good for gaming and AI, while the MSI Thin GF63 is only fair.
The Acer Nitro 16 is very good for gaming and 3D due to its higher-end graphics card and a screen with a higher refresh rate, which results in smoother visuals and performance in demanding scenarios. In comparison, the MSI Thin GF63 also performs well for gaming and 3D tasks with a competent graphics card but has a slightly lower screen refresh rate, impacting fluidity in fast-paced games and applications.
Engineering and Design
8.2/10
7.5/10
7.9/10
OVERALL CPU SCORE
8.7/10
8.9/10
OVERALL GPU SCORE
5.6/10
16.0 GB
RAM
16.0 GB
The Acer Nitro 16 is very good for engineering and design, while the MSI Thin GF63 is good.
The Acer Nitro 16 stands out for engineering and design due to a higher-end CPU and GPU, which translates to more efficient processing in intensive tasks and better graphics rendering, plus a higher resolution and color coverage screen that benefits design work. Meanwhile, the MSI Thin GF63, while still capable with a competent CPU and GPU, compromises slightly on screen quality and color accuracy, which might be less ideal for high-fidelity design but benefits from being lighter and thus more portable for daily travel..
Screen Quality
8.3/10
6.8/10
16.0in
SIZE
15.6in
2560 x 1600
RESOLUTION
1920 x 1080
IPS
DISPLAY TECHNOLOGY
IPS
165Hz
REFRESH RATE
144Hz
494.0 nits
BRIGHTNESS
262.0 nits
The Acer Nitro 16 has a better screen than the MSI Thin GF63 for general use, gaming and AI, engineering and design, software development, and content creation.
If you're focused on day-to-day tasks like browsing or office work, the Acer Nitro 16's superior resolution and brightness make it a clear winner, ensuring crisp text and vivid images. For engineering and design professionals who require accurate color representation, the Nitro's wider color gamuts provide the fidelity needed for precise work. However, gamers and 3D artists will find both laptops less than ideal due to the low refresh rates, but the Nitro's better panel type and resolution still offer a somewhat better visual experience for less demanding games and 3D tasks.
Battery
9.0 Hours
4.5 Hours
The Acer Nitro 16 has 9 hours of battery life. The MSI Thin GF63 has 4.5 hours of battery life.
Battery life estimate is based on a mix of common use patterns. More portable and higher performing laptops tend to have less battery life.
Portability
Fair
Good
16.0in
SIZE
15.6in
5.9 lbs
WEIGHT
4.1 lbs
1.1in
THICKNESS
0.8in
The MSI Thin GF63 has good portability, while the Acer Nitro 16 has only fair portability.
The most portable laptops are small, thin, and light.
Build Quality
7.4/10
6.5/10
The Acer Nitro 16 has good build quality, while the MSI Thin GF63 has only fair build quality.
PerfectRec’s Build Quality Score incorporates case materials, display and keyboard flex, hinge quality, and overall reliability.
Cost
$1,050
$1,150
$400
$600
$800
$1,000
$1,200
$1,400
$1,600
$1,800
The Acer Nitro 16 has a price of $1,050 and the MSI Thin GF63 costs $1,150.
The Acer Nitro 16 and MSI Thin GF63 are both good for general use.
The Acer Nitro 16 offers greater battery life, a larger and higher-resolution display, thereby enhancing screen quality, which, along with robust CPU and GPU, supports extensive general use, although it is heavier and less portable than the MSI Thin GF63. The MSI Thin GF63, on the other hand, while still providing good CPU and comparable GPU capacity, is lighter and thus easier to carry around, but it has shorter battery life and a smaller, lower-resolution screen, possibly impacting multitasking and high-definition content consumption. Both laptops have identical amounts of storage and RAM, ensuring good system responsiveness and capacity for general computing tasks.
Content Creation
7.8/10
7.4/10
7.9/10
OVERALL CPU SCORE
8.7/10
2560 x 1600
RESOLUTION
1920 x 1080
16.0 GB
RAM
16.0 GB
IPS
DISPLAY TECHNOLOGY
IPS
The Acer Nitro 16 and MSI Thin GF63 are both good for content creation.
PerfectRec’s Content Creation Score takes into account the many different features of the laptop that make it more or less suitable for photo editing, video editing and other content creation tasks.
Software Development
7.7/10
7.2/10
7.9/10
OVERALL CPU SCORE
8.7/10
16.0 GB
RAM
16.0 GB
2560 x 1600
RESOLUTION
1920 x 1080
8.0/10
KEYBOARD QUALITY SCORE
7.0/10
The Acer Nitro 16 and MSI Thin GF63 are both good for software development.
PerfectRec’s Software Development Score takes into account the many different features of the laptop that make it more or less suitable for software developers.
Give feedback
We’re constantly working to improve.
How the Acer Nitro 16 and the MSI Thin GF63 compare to other laptops
"Video editing, rendering and, of course, gaming represent the Nitro 16's core competencies with a Ryzen 7 7735HS and GeForce RTX 4070 providing the necessary power. Both chips run at consistently high clock speeds. A fast PCIe 4 SSD (1 TB) provides the required storage space and ensures short loading times. With the Nitro 16 AN16-41, Acer has a well-specced, mid-range gaming laptop in its portfolio."
"The MSI GF63 Thin 11SC can be an admirable value for gamers and power users on a minimal budget. For just $599 as reviewed in its base model, its Intel Core i5 H-class processor and Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 graphics perform much better than low-wattage CPUs and integrated graphics. That said, this is a light-class gaming laptop. Low scores in our demanding gaming benchmarks indicate using lower visual-quality settings will be required for playable performance."
Get a great deal on the Acer Nitro 16 or the MSI Thin GF63
About Acer
Acer is a prominent Taiwanese electronics brand which makes a wide range of laptops, with multiple product lines catering to personal use, gaming, and business use. They are renowned for having exceptional value for money, as they frequently offer good specifications at a lower price than other manufacturers.
About MSI
MSI, also known as Micro-Star International, is a Taiwanese technology corporation. MSI is known for their wide range of gaming devices. Their series include the entry-level Cyborg/Thin and Sword/Katana series, the mid-range Bravo/Delta and Crosshair/Pulse series, and their high-end Vector, Raider, Stealth, and Titan GT series. At every performance level, MSI offers a variety of devices with varying balances between performance, battery life, weight, and price, making them a solid option to consider at every price point.
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec laptops team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest laptop information and makes it digestible for you.
By the numbers
380
Laptops evaluated
48,640
Laptops stats compiled
13
Proprietary Laptops ratings developed
109,995
Recommendations made
23,833
Consumer hours saved
About the laptop team
Joe Golden, Ph.D
CEO and Laptops Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.
Jason Lew
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.
Chandradeep Chowdhury
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.
Craig Russell
Laptops Expert
Craig is a UK-based laptops expert. Craig works in IT, where he recommends and supports laptops and PCs for clients and has been recommending laptops on Reddit for five years.