The Acer Nitro 16 offers superior performance with more RAM and a more powerful graphics card, making it better suited for gaming and intensive applications like 3D rendering or engineering tasks. With a larger screen and higher resolution, it's ideal for those prioritizing visual work and entertainment, although it's bulkier and heavier than the MSI GF65 Thin. The MSI, on the other hand, is lighter and thus more portable, which may benefit users who travel frequently. However, its older processor and graphics card mean it will not perform as well in demanding scenarios, despite being better for general use and multitasking. Both laptops are similarly priced, so the decision should be based on whether you require high performance and a larger display or a more portable device with adequate capability for everyday tasks. Give Feedback
this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the Acer Nitro 16
Good for general use
Very good for engineering and design
Very good for gaming and AI
Good for software development
Good for content creation
Very good overall display quality
Good overall build quality
Good battery life
Good speakers
Very good keyboard
Advantages of the MSI GF65 Thin
Good portability
Key differences
General Use
7.8/10
6.5/10
2560 x 1600
RESOLUTION
1920 x 1080
IPS
DISPLAY TECHNOLOGY
IPS
494.0 nits
DISPLAY BRIGHTNESS
262.0 nits
9.0 Hours
BATTERY LIFE
4.5 Hours
8.0/10
KEYBOARD QUALITY SCORE
7.0/10
6.0/10
PORTABILITY SCORE
7.3/10
The Acer Nitro 16 is good for general use, while the MSI GF65 Thin is only fair.
The Acer Nitro 16 offers more RAM, a more powerful CPU, and a higher screen quality with a larger battery, which are very important for general use, making it a capable option for a range of tasks. The MSI GF65 Thin, while more portable due to its lower weight, provides less RAM and CPU power, a lower resolution display, and shorter battery life, making it less ideal for demanding general use but more convenient for carrying around.
Gaming and AI
8.0/10
6.8/10
8.9/10
OVERALL GPU SCORE
6.1/10
2560 x 1600
RESOLUTION
1920 x 1080
165Hz
REFRESH RATE
144Hz
Yes
SUPPORTS DLSS
Yes
Yes
MUX SWITCH / ADVANCED OPTIMUS
No
7.0/10
FAN NOISE SCORE
6.5/10
The Acer Nitro 16 is very good for gaming and AI, while the MSI GF65 Thin is only fair.
The Acer Nitro 16 is better for gaming and 3D tasks primarily because it has a more powerful GPU, the Nvidia RTX 4070, and a higher screen refresh rate of 165Hz, which delivers smoother visuals during fast-paced scenes than the MSI GF65 Thin's Nvidia RTX 3060 and its 144Hz screen refresh rate. Furthermore, Acer's screen quality and CPU are likely superior, enhancing the overall gaming experience and task handling.
Engineering and Design
8.2/10
6.7/10
7.9/10
OVERALL CPU SCORE
4.6/10
8.9/10
OVERALL GPU SCORE
6.1/10
16.0 GB
RAM
8.0 GB
The Acer Nitro 16 is very good for engineering and design, while the MSI GF65 Thin is only fair.
The Acer Nitro 16 takes the lead in engineering and design use due to its combination of a potent AMD Ryzen processor and Nvidia RTX 4070 GPU, allowing for better handling of complex tasks and graphics-intensive applications, along with more RAM for effective multitasking. While the MSI GF65 Thin is also equipped for such tasks with a capable Intel processor and Nvidia RTX GPU, it has less RAM and a less powerful GPU than the Nitro 16, which can impact performance in demanding engineering software and detailed design work.
Content Creation
7.8/10
6.8/10
7.9/10
OVERALL CPU SCORE
4.6/10
2560 x 1600
RESOLUTION
1920 x 1080
16.0 GB
RAM
8.0 GB
IPS
DISPLAY TECHNOLOGY
IPS
The Acer Nitro 16 is good for content creation, while the MSI GF65 Thin is only fair.
PerfectRec’s Content Creation Score takes into account the many different features of the laptop that make it more or less suitable for photo editing, video editing and other content creation tasks.
Software Development
7.7/10
6.3/10
7.9/10
OVERALL CPU SCORE
4.6/10
16.0 GB
RAM
8.0 GB
2560 x 1600
RESOLUTION
1920 x 1080
8.0/10
KEYBOARD QUALITY SCORE
7.0/10
The Acer Nitro 16 is good for software development, while the MSI GF65 Thin is only fair.
PerfectRec’s Software Development Score takes into account the many different features of the laptop that make it more or less suitable for software developers.
Screen Quality
8.3/10
6.8/10
16.0in
SIZE
15.6in
2560 x 1600
RESOLUTION
1920 x 1080
IPS
DISPLAY TECHNOLOGY
IPS
165Hz
REFRESH RATE
144Hz
494.0 nits
BRIGHTNESS
262.0 nits
The Acer Nitro 16 has a better screen than the MSI GF65 Thin for general use, gaming and AI, engineering and design, software development, and content creation.
The Acer Nitro 16's robust resolution and brightness make it a strong choice for everyday tasks and detail-oriented engineering work, where clear visuals and accurate colors are vital. However, its lower refresh rate becomes a drawback for gaming and 3D applications, which benefit from smoother motion. The MSI GF65 Thin offers acceptable clarity for general and design needs but doesn't stand out for any particular use due to moderate screen specifications, leading to a compromise in vibrancy for design tasks and responsiveness in fast-paced gaming scenarios.
Battery
9.0 Hours
4.5 Hours
The Acer Nitro 16 has 9 hours of battery life. The MSI GF65 Thin has 4.5 hours of battery life.
Battery life estimate is based on a mix of common use patterns. More portable and higher performing laptops tend to have less battery life.
Portability
Fair
Good
16.0in
SIZE
15.6in
5.9 lbs
WEIGHT
4.1 lbs
1.1in
THICKNESS
0.8in
The MSI GF65 Thin has good portability, while the Acer Nitro 16 has only fair portability.
The most portable laptops are small, thin, and light.
Build Quality
7.4/10
6.7/10
The Acer Nitro 16 has good build quality, while the MSI GF65 Thin has only fair build quality.
PerfectRec’s Build Quality Score incorporates case materials, display and keyboard flex, hinge quality, and overall reliability.
Cost
$1,275
$1,100
$0
$500
$1,000
$1,500
$2,000
The Acer Nitro 16 has a price of $1,275 and the MSI GF65 Thin costs $1,100.
"Video editing, rendering and, of course, gaming represent the Nitro 16's core competencies with a Ryzen 7 7735HS and GeForce RTX 4070 providing the necessary power. Both chips run at consistently high clock speeds. A fast PCIe 4 SSD (1 TB) provides the required storage space and ensures short loading times. With the Nitro 16 AN16-41, Acer has a well-specced, mid-range gaming laptop in its portfolio."
"The MSI GF65 Thin offers a GeForce RTX 3060 on a budget. The MSI GF65 is a relatively inexpensive RTX 3060 laptop and, perhaps not coincidentally, it also comes with a slower-than-average RTX 3060 GPU. Other laptops we've tested thus far with the same GPU are about 10 to 15 percent faster. CPU performance is also slightly slower than average unless if users decide to enable Cooler Boost mode. Colors, black-white response times, Thunderbolt, and DisplayPort are either average or completely omitted. Gamers who want to maximize performance-per-dollar without sacrificing RAM or SSD upgradeability will find the lightweight MSI GF65 attractive."
Get a great deal on the Acer Nitro 16 or the MSI GF65 Thin
About Acer
Acer is a prominent Taiwanese electronics brand which makes a wide range of laptops, with multiple product lines catering to personal use, gaming, and business use. They are renowned for having exceptional value for money, as they frequently offer good specifications at a lower price than other manufacturers.
About MSI
MSI, also known as Micro-Star International, is a Taiwanese technology corporation. MSI is known for their wide range of gaming devices. Their series include the entry-level Cyborg/Thin and Sword/Katana series, the mid-range Bravo/Delta and Crosshair/Pulse series, and their high-end Vector, Raider, Stealth, and Titan GT series. At every performance level, MSI offers a variety of devices with varying balances between performance, battery life, weight, and price, making them a solid option to consider at every price point.
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec laptops team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest laptop information and makes it digestible for you.
By the numbers
380
Laptops evaluated
48,640
Laptops stats compiled
13
Proprietary Laptops ratings developed
124,695
Recommendations made
27,018
Consumer hours saved
About the laptop team
Joe Golden, Ph.D
CEO and Laptops Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.
Jason Lew
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.
Chandradeep Chowdhury
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.
Craig Russell
Laptops Expert
Craig is a UK-based laptops expert. Craig works in IT, where he recommends and supports laptops and PCs for clients and has been recommending laptops on Reddit for five years.