When choosing between the Acer Nitro 16 and the ASUS TUF Gaming A15, consider that the Nitro has a slightly larger and higher-resolution screen, which may offer a crisper display, especially for multimedia and gaming. However, the TUF Gaming A15, albeit with a lower resolution screen, provides a larger storage capacity. Both have the same graphics card and RAM, ensuring similar high-level gaming and multitasking performance, but the TUF features a more advanced processor, potentially offering better performance in demanding tasks. The ASUS is also lighter and slimmer, enhancing portability. If budget is a primary concern, the Acer provides a strong option with a lower price, though with trade-offs in screen resolution, storage, and CPU prowess. If you prioritize higher performance and portability and don't mind spending slightly more, the ASUS could be the better choice. Give Feedback
this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the Acer Nitro 16
Very good overall display quality
Good speakers
Very good keyboard
Advantages of the ASUS TUF Gaming A15
Very good for content creation
Good portability
Very good battery life
Key differences
Screen Quality
8.3/10
7.2/10
16.0in
SIZE
15.6in
2560 x 1600
RESOLUTION
1920 x 1080
IPS
DISPLAY TECHNOLOGY
IPS
165Hz
REFRESH RATE
144Hz
494.0 nits
BRIGHTNESS
271.0 nits
The Acer Nitro 16 has a better screen than the ASUS TUF Gaming A15 for general use, gaming and AI, and engineering and design, while the ASUS TUF Gaming A15 has a better screen for software development.
If you prioritize a vibrant display with sharp detail for routine tasks or engineering software, the Acer Nitro 16's superior resolution and panel quality can make texts and images crisp and colors more accurate. Meanwhile, the ASUS TUF Gaming A15, though adequate for day-to-day and professional work, may not present color details as finely. However, for gaming or 3D applications, both models fall short due to their lower refresh rates, which can limit the smoothness and responsiveness needed in fast-paced visual content.
Battery
9.0 Hours
11.0 Hours
The Acer Nitro 16 has 9 hours of battery life. The ASUS TUF Gaming A15 has 11 hours of battery life.
Battery life estimate is based on a mix of common use patterns. More portable and higher performing laptops tend to have less battery life.
Portability
Fair
Good
16.0in
SIZE
15.6in
5.9 lbs
WEIGHT
4.8 lbs
1.1in
THICKNESS
0.9in
The ASUS TUF Gaming A15 has good portability, while the Acer Nitro 16 has only fair portability.
The most portable laptops are small, thin, and light.
Cost
$1,050
$1,712
$500
$1,000
$1,500
$2,000
$2,500
$3,000
The Acer Nitro 16 has a price of $1,050 and the ASUS TUF Gaming A15 costs $1,712.
The ASUS TUF Gaming A15 and Acer Nitro 16 are both good for general use.
The Acer Nitro 16 is well-suited for general use due to its balance of a strong CPU, sufficient RAM, and a high-resolution screen that offers good detail for multiple applications, but it's a bit heavier and bulkier which could affect portability. In contrast, the ASUS TUF Gaming A15 also provides powerful performance with a robust CPU and plenty of RAM, offers a higher storage capacity that's beneficial for various applications, and is more portable due to its lighter weight, but its lower-resolution screen may not be as sharp for certain tasks. Both laptops have good battery life that supports longer use without the need for constant charging.
Gaming and AI
8.0/10
8.0/10
8.9/10
OVERALL GPU SCORE
8.9/10
2560 x 1600
RESOLUTION
1920 x 1080
165Hz
REFRESH RATE
144Hz
Yes
SUPPORTS DLSS
Yes
Yes
MUX SWITCH / ADVANCED OPTIMUS
Yes
7.0/10
FAN NOISE SCORE
6.7/10
The ASUS TUF Gaming A15 and Acer Nitro 16 are both very good for gaming and AI.
The Acer Nitro 16 boasts a higher screen refresh rate and a better screen resolution, enhancing gaming and 3D experience compared to the ASUS TUF Gaming A15, which while offering solid gaming performance with the same GPU, has a lower screen refresh rate and resolution which is somewhat important for intensive tasks like gaming and 3D applications. Both laptops have powerful CPUs and high-quality IPS screens, which are key factors for improved gaming and 3D modeling efficiency; however, the Acer's advantage in refresh rate and resolution delivers a visibly smoother and crisper visual experience.
Engineering and Design
8.2/10
8.2/10
7.9/10
OVERALL CPU SCORE
9.1/10
8.9/10
OVERALL GPU SCORE
8.9/10
16.0 GB
RAM
16.0 GB
The ASUS TUF Gaming A15 and Acer Nitro 16 are both very good for engineering and design.
The Acer Nitro 16 and ASUS TUF Gaming A15 are well-suited for engineering and design due to their strong CPUs and dedicated GPUs, which are crucial for demanding software used in these fields. The Acer offers a larger, higher resolution screen with a favorable aspect ratio for design work, while the ASUS is lighter, making it more portable but with a lower screen resolution and smaller size that may not be as optimal for detailed work. Both have ample RAM and high-quality keyboards, but the Acer has a slight edge in screen color accuracy and brightness, which can be important for design precision.
Content Creation
7.8/10
8.0/10
7.9/10
OVERALL CPU SCORE
9.1/10
2560 x 1600
RESOLUTION
1920 x 1080
16.0 GB
RAM
16.0 GB
IPS
DISPLAY TECHNOLOGY
IPS
Although they have very similar scores, PerfectRec considers ASUS TUF Gaming A15 to be very good for content creation, while the Acer Nitro 16 is good.
PerfectRec’s Content Creation Score takes into account the many different features of the laptop that make it more or less suitable for photo editing, video editing and other content creation tasks.
Software Development
7.7/10
7.6/10
7.9/10
OVERALL CPU SCORE
9.1/10
16.0 GB
RAM
16.0 GB
2560 x 1600
RESOLUTION
1920 x 1080
8.0/10
KEYBOARD QUALITY SCORE
7.0/10
The Acer Nitro 16 and ASUS TUF Gaming A15 are both good for software development.
PerfectRec’s Software Development Score takes into account the many different features of the laptop that make it more or less suitable for software developers.
Build Quality
7.4/10
7.2/10
The Acer Nitro 16 and ASUS TUF Gaming A15 both have good build quality.
PerfectRec’s Build Quality Score incorporates case materials, display and keyboard flex, hinge quality, and overall reliability.
Give feedback
We’re constantly working to improve.
How the Acer Nitro 16 and the ASUS TUF Gaming A15 compare to other laptops
"Video editing, rendering and, of course, gaming represent the Nitro 16's core competencies with a Ryzen 7 7735HS and GeForce RTX 4070 providing the necessary power. Both chips run at consistently high clock speeds. A fast PCIe 4 SSD (1 TB) provides the required storage space and ensures short loading times. With the Nitro 16 AN16-41, Acer has a well-specced, mid-range gaming laptop in its portfolio."
"With the release of the TUF Gaming A15, Asos have concentrated on the essentials: gaming performance. Our base version, which can be had for around $1,169, already provided enough power to play current games smoothly in a native resolution of 1080p and with maximum details - thanks to its new Nvidia GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop. If you utilize upscaling, then you can even manage to run ray tracing."
Get a great deal on the Acer Nitro 16 or the ASUS TUF Gaming A15
About Acer
Acer is a prominent Taiwanese electronics brand which makes a wide range of laptops, with multiple product lines catering to personal use, gaming, and business use. They are renowned for having exceptional value for money, as they frequently offer good specifications at a lower price than other manufacturers.
About ASUS
ASUS, a Taiwanese electronics brand, is one of the largest personal computer vendor by market share. The majority of their laptops are targeted towards personal use or gaming. Their most popular product lines include the budget-friendly VivoBook, more premium ZenBook, and their TUF and ROG gaming laptops, the latter of which has a reputation for excellent gaming performance.
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec laptops team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest laptop information and makes it digestible for you.
By the numbers
380
Laptops evaluated
48,640
Laptops stats compiled
13
Proprietary Laptops ratings developed
109,995
Recommendations made
23,833
Consumer hours saved
About the laptop team
Joe Golden, Ph.D
CEO and Laptops Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.
Jason Lew
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.
Chandradeep Chowdhury
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.
Craig Russell
Laptops Expert
Craig is a UK-based laptops expert. Craig works in IT, where he recommends and supports laptops and PCs for clients and has been recommending laptops on Reddit for five years.