The Acer Nitro 16 and the Acer Predator Triton 300 are similarly priced and both offer 512GB of storage and 16GB of RAM. The Nitro 16 stands out with a newer AMD Ryzen processor and a more powerful Nvidia RTX 4070 GPU, beneficial for intensive gaming, 3D rendering, and machine learning, and also boasts a larger 16-inch display with a higher resolution and refresh rate than the Triton 300, enhancing the visual experience and response in fast-paced games. In contrast, the Predator Triton 300 comes with an older Intel i7 processor and an Nvidia RTX 3060 GPU, which is still capable but less so for cutting-edge tasks. It has a slightly smaller and lighter design, contributing to better portability, and a longer release history. If longer battery life and portability are priorities, the Triton 300 may suit you better; however, if you're focused on higher performance and a better display for gaming and creative tasks, the Nitro 16 would be the superior choice. Give Feedback
this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the Acer Nitro 16
Very good for engineering and design
Very good for gaming and AI
Very good overall display quality
Good battery life
Very good keyboard
Advantages of the Acer Predator Triton 300
Good portability
Key differences
Gaming and AI
8.0/10
7.1/10
8.9/10
OVERALL GPU SCORE
6.5/10
2560 x 1600
RESOLUTION
1920 x 1080
165Hz
REFRESH RATE
144Hz
Yes
SUPPORTS DLSS
Yes
Yes
MUX SWITCH / ADVANCED OPTIMUS
No
7.0/10
FAN NOISE SCORE
7.5/10
The Acer Nitro 16 is very good for gaming and AI, while the Acer Predator Triton 300 is good.
The Acer Nitro 16 stands out for gaming and 3D with its advanced Nvidia RTX 4070 GPU, offering superior graphics performance and a higher screen refresh rate which provides smoother visuals, while the Acer Predator Triton 300, with its Nvidia RTX 3060 GPU, also offers a solid gaming experience but at a lower refresh rate, making it slightly less fluid in comparison. Both laptops have competent CPUs and high-quality IPS screens, but the better GPU and refresh rate in the Nitro 16 make it more suited for very intense gaming and 3D tasks.
Engineering and Design
8.2/10
7.5/10
7.9/10
OVERALL CPU SCORE
7.4/10
8.9/10
OVERALL GPU SCORE
6.5/10
16.0 GB
RAM
16.0 GB
The Acer Nitro 16 is very good for engineering and design, while the Acer Predator Triton 300 is good.
The Acer Nitro 16 has a more powerful GPU and a higher quality screen with better resolution and color coverage, making it particularly well-suited for demanding engineering and design tasks. However, the lighter and more compact Acer Predator Triton 300, while slightly less capable in terms of raw power and display quality, may be a better choice for those prioritizing portability and who are working on less graphics-intensive projects.
Software Development
7.7/10
7.1/10
7.9/10
OVERALL CPU SCORE
7.4/10
16.0 GB
RAM
16.0 GB
2560 x 1600
RESOLUTION
1920 x 1080
8.0/10
KEYBOARD QUALITY SCORE
7.5/10
The Acer Nitro 16 and Acer Predator Triton 300 are both good for software development, though the Acer Nitro 16 is somewhat better.
PerfectRec’s Software Development Score takes into account the many different features of the laptop that make it more or less suitable for software developers.
Screen Quality
8.3/10
7.3/10
16.0in
SIZE
15.6in
2560 x 1600
RESOLUTION
1920 x 1080
IPS
DISPLAY TECHNOLOGY
IPS
165Hz
REFRESH RATE
144Hz
494.0 nits
BRIGHTNESS
294.0 nits
The Acer Nitro 16 has a better screen than the Acer Predator Triton 300 for general use, gaming and AI, engineering and design, software development, and content creation.
The Acer Nitro 16 likely boasts better resolution and brightness, and a panel type that offers clearer and more vivid image quality, which is essential for tasks like document editing and web browsing that fall under general use. For engineering and design, the same device probably has wider color coverage, ensuring that professionals who rely on color accuracy for their work - like graphic designers and engineers - get the true-to-life representation they need. However, its lower refresh rate may not be ideal for Gaming and 3D applications, where smooth motion and rapid visual updates are crucial for an immersive experience.
Battery
9.0 Hours
5.5 Hours
The Acer Nitro 16 has 9 hours of battery life. The Acer Predator Triton 300 has 5.5 hours of battery life.
Battery life estimate is based on a mix of common use patterns. More portable and higher performing laptops tend to have less battery life.
Portability
Fair
Good
16.0in
SIZE
15.6in
5.9 lbs
WEIGHT
4.4 lbs
1.1in
THICKNESS
0.7in
The Acer Predator Triton 300 has good portability, while the Acer Nitro 16 has only fair portability.
The most portable laptops are small, thin, and light.
Cost
$1,050
$1,150
$400
$600
$800
$1,000
$1,200
$1,400
$1,600
$1,800
The Acer Nitro 16 has a price of $1,050 and the Acer Predator Triton 300 costs $1,150.
The Acer Nitro 16 and Acer Predator Triton 300 are both good for general use.
The Acer Nitro 16 boasts a newer CPU, higher screen resolution, larger battery, and better heat management, making it well-suited for a variety of day-to-day tasks and longer use between charges, but it is less portable and heavier than the Predator Triton 300. In contrast, the Acer Predator Triton 300, while older and offering a lower screen resolution, is lighter and more portable with decent battery life, and is still capable for general use with a comparable CPU and RAM, and a good balance of keyboard and speaker quality.
Content Creation
7.8/10
7.3/10
7.9/10
OVERALL CPU SCORE
7.4/10
2560 x 1600
RESOLUTION
1920 x 1080
16.0 GB
RAM
16.0 GB
IPS
DISPLAY TECHNOLOGY
IPS
The Acer Nitro 16 and Acer Predator Triton 300 are both good for content creation.
PerfectRec’s Content Creation Score takes into account the many different features of the laptop that make it more or less suitable for photo editing, video editing and other content creation tasks.
Build Quality
7.4/10
7.6/10
The Acer Predator Triton 300 and Acer Nitro 16 both have good build quality.
PerfectRec’s Build Quality Score incorporates case materials, display and keyboard flex, hinge quality, and overall reliability.
Give feedback
We’re constantly working to improve.
How the Acer Nitro 16 and the Acer Predator Triton 300 compare to other laptops
"Video editing, rendering and, of course, gaming represent the Nitro 16's core competencies with a Ryzen 7 7735HS and GeForce RTX 4070 providing the necessary power. Both chips run at consistently high clock speeds. A fast PCIe 4 SSD (1 TB) provides the required storage space and ensures short loading times. With the Nitro 16 AN16-41, Acer has a well-specced, mid-range gaming laptop in its portfolio."
"In our particular review configuration, the Acer Predator Triton 300 turned out to be a fairly powerful gaming notebook. Both CPU and GPU performance were at a high level, and the aluminum case turned out to be fairly robust. Only the display lid could have been a bit more robust. For customers on a budget that do not mind tinkering with the device’s fan management the Acer Predator Triton 300 can be worth a closer look."
Get a great deal on the Acer Nitro 16 or the Acer Predator Triton 300
About Acer
Acer is a prominent Taiwanese electronics brand which makes a wide range of laptops, with multiple product lines catering to personal use, gaming, and business use. They are renowned for having exceptional value for money, as they frequently offer good specifications at a lower price than other manufacturers.
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec laptops team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest laptop information and makes it digestible for you.
By the numbers
380
Laptops evaluated
48,640
Laptops stats compiled
13
Proprietary Laptops ratings developed
109,995
Recommendations made
23,833
Consumer hours saved
About the laptop team
Joe Golden, Ph.D
CEO and Laptops Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.
Jason Lew
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.
Chandradeep Chowdhury
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.
Craig Russell
Laptops Expert
Craig is a UK-based laptops expert. Craig works in IT, where he recommends and supports laptops and PCs for clients and has been recommending laptops on Reddit for five years.