Acer Aspire Vero 15 vs ASUS Vivobook S 15

For general use, both the Acer Aspire Vero 15 and ASUS Vivobook S 15 offer acceptable screen quality due to sufficient resolution and brightness levels for everyday tasks like browsing and document editing, but their panel types may not provide the most vivid colors or sharpest images. When it comes to engineering and design, the same screens may fall short in delivering the wide color gamuts required for precise color work, potentially impacting color-sensitive projects. For gaming and 3D applications where smooth motion is key, the limited refresh rates on these laptops would result in less fluid visuals compared to models with higher refresh rates, which could affect the gaming experience.

Battery life estimate is based on a mix of common use patterns. More portable and higher performing laptops tend to have less battery life.

The Acer Aspire Vero 15 is appreciated for general use due to its balance of efficient CPU and adequate RAM, coupled with a quality screen and commendable portability, albeit with moderate battery life. Conversely, the ASUS Vivobook S 15 is also suitable for general purposes, offering a powerful CPU and substantial RAM, with a high-quality display and better battery life, but it is slightly heavier, which may affect its portability.

The Acer Aspire Vero 15 and ASUS Vivobook S 15 are fair for gaming and 3D due to their integrated GPUs, Intel Iris Xe for the Acer and Vega 8 for the ASUS, which can manage basic gaming but fall short for more intensive use, and both come with 60Hz screen refresh rates that aren't ideal for fast-paced games which benefit from higher rates. While both have competent CPUs, the ASUS holding a slight edge, and decent screen quality, they lack the high-performance graphics cards that dedicated gaming laptops offer, making them fair rather than excellent for demanding tasks.

The Acer Aspire Vero 15 offers a strong Intel processor with integrated graphics suitable for design tasks, while the ASUS Vivobook S 15 leverages a higher storage capacity and powerful AMD processor with integrated graphics, making it capable of handling demanding engineering workloads. Both have high-quality screens for detailed designs, although the Vivobook may offer a slightly better viewing experience and longer battery life, which, along with its newer release, might justify choosing it for more intensive and current engineering and design use.

PerfectRec’s Content Creation Score takes into account the many different features of the laptop that make it more or less suitable for photo editing, video editing and other content creation tasks.

PerfectRec’s Software Development Score takes into account the many different features of the laptop that make it more or less suitable for software developers.

PerfectRec’s Build Quality Score incorporates case materials, display and keyboard flex, hinge quality, and overall reliability.