Acer Aspire 3 Spin 14 vs HP Stream 14"

If you prioritize screen quality for everyday tasks like browsing and watching videos, the Acer Aspire 3 Spin 14's screen is adequate, while the HP Stream 14 may disappoint with its lesser quality display. When it comes to engineering and design, the Aspire 3 Spin is just passable since color accuracy matters, but for the HP Stream, the lack of wide color gamut coverage could hinder detailed design work. For gaming and 3D applications, the Acer's screen falls short due to its refresh rate and the HP Stream even more so, making neither ideal for fast-paced or visually intensive tasks.

PerfectRec’s Build Quality Score incorporates case materials, display and keyboard flex, hinge quality, and overall reliability.

The Acer Aspire 3 Spin 14 offers a moderate performance CPU and RAM combination, which is adequate for general use, and has a high-quality IPS touchscreen, making it versatile for both laptop and tablet use, but storage might be limited for heavy users. In comparison, the HP Stream 14" offers more storage and RAM which may benefit heavy multitaskers, but its lower resolution, non-IPS screen could detract from the visual experience, and while it boasts a solid build and excellent heat management, its overall performance is constrained by a more basic CPU.

The Acer Aspire 3 Spin 14 offers fair gaming and 3D capabilities with its Intel UHD Graphics Xe, which perform moderately well for light gaming, and an IPS panel that provides better screen quality compared to the HP Stream 14's older TN panel and less capable Intel UHD Graphics 600, resulting in its poor gaming and 3D performance. Both laptops have the same screen refresh rate, but the Acer's improved GPU and screen quality, including better color coverage and brightness, contribute to a more suitable gaming experience than the HP Stream 14.

The Acer Aspire 3 Spin 14 offers a higher pixel density, a better screen aspect ratio suitable for multitasking, and acceptable processor and graphics for mainstream engineering and design tasks, while the HP Stream 14" has lesser screen quality and uses a processor and graphics that are less capable of handling such tasks efficiently. Additionally, while both devices are fairly portable and have good battery life, the increased screen resolution and better aspect ratio of the Acer contribute to a more conducive environment for engineering and design work compared to the HP's lower screen quality and less powerful hardware.

PerfectRec’s Content Creation Score takes into account the many different features of the laptop that make it more or less suitable for photo editing, video editing and other content creation tasks.

PerfectRec’s Software Development Score takes into account the many different features of the laptop that make it more or less suitable for software developers.

Battery life estimate is based on a mix of common use patterns. More portable and higher performing laptops tend to have less battery life.