Acer Aspire 3 15 vs Gigabyte Aorus 17G

The Acer Aspire 3 15, with its moderate processor and graphics, less RAM, and lower screen quality is suitable for basic tasks, but the Gigabyte Aorus 17G, offering a more powerful CPU, double the RAM, and a screen with higher brightness and color accuracy, excels in more demanding applications while also having a longer battery life; however, it's heavier, making it less portable.

The Gigabyte Aorus 17G offers better gaming and 3D capabilities with its more powerful Nvidia RTX 3070 GPU and a high refresh rate display of 300 versus the Acer Aspire 3 15's entry-level AMD Radeon 610M GPU and 60 refresh rate, both of which are very important for smooth and detailed visual performance. Additionally, the Aorus 17G's superior CPU and screen quality, which are somewhat important factors, contribute further to its enhanced gaming and 3D experience.

The Gigabyte Aorus 17G offers superior performance for engineering and design due to its more powerful Intel processor, higher RAM, and stronger Nvidia graphics card, along with better screen quality, hence it's suited for more demanding computational tasks. In contrast, the Acer Aspire 3 15, with its AMD Ryzen 3 processor and Radeon graphics, provides fair performance, but it's less capable for intensive applications, although it is lighter and quieter, making it more portable and convenient for less demanding engineering work.

When considering the Acer Aspire 3 15 for general use, its screen quality is adequate due to a satisfactory balance of resolution and brightness, which ensures comfortable everyday activities like browsing and video streaming. For engineering and design, although the Acer's screen resolution is sufficient for detail, its limited color gamut may not display colors as accurately as professionals require. Conversely, the Gigabyte Aorus 17G's screen displays colors more vividly and accurately, a boon for engineering and design, but its lower refresh rate, despite a decent resolution and panel type, falls short for the fluid visuals demanded by Gaming and 3D applications.

Battery life estimate is based on a mix of common use patterns. More portable and higher performing laptops tend to have less battery life.

PerfectRec’s Build Quality Score incorporates case materials, display and keyboard flex, hinge quality, and overall reliability.

PerfectRec’s Content Creation Score takes into account the many different features of the laptop that make it more or less suitable for photo editing, video editing and other content creation tasks.

PerfectRec’s Software Development Score takes into account the many different features of the laptop that make it more or less suitable for software developers.