Acer Aspire 3 14 vs ASUS Vivobook 16X

The Acer Aspire 3 14 is described as fair for general use due mainly to its adequate CPU and RAM for everyday tasks, a standard quality screen, and longer battery life making it more portable, whereas the ASUS Vivobook 16X offers better performance with a stronger CPU and more RAM, a higher quality and larger screen useful for multitasking, but with increased weight which slightly reduces portability and a shorter battery life expectancy. Additionally, while both have similar storage and decent build quality, the Vivobook 16X stands out with superior keyboard and speaker quality, but these enhancements also contribute to its higher weight, potentially impacting its ease of carrying around.

The Acer Aspire 3 14 has an AMD Radeon 610M GPU and a screen refresh rate of 60Hz, which are less powerful for gaming and 3D tasks compared to the ASUS Vivobook 16X, which boasts a superior Nvidia RTX 4060 GPU and a higher refresh rate of 120Hz, providing smoother visuals and improved gaming performance.

The ASUS Vivobook 16X offers a more powerful CPU and GPU, a larger and higher-resolution screen, and twice the RAM, making it very suitable for the demands of engineering and design tasks. In contrast, the Acer Aspire 3 14 has a more limited RAM and less powerful CPU and GPU, plus a smaller and dimmer screen, which makes it only fair for these tasks, but it does offer greater portability and silent operation.

The Acer Aspire 3 14's screen may not be as sharp or vibrant because it likely has a lower resolution and less brightness compared to screens found on more premium devices, which is adequate for general use but not optimal for visually demanding tasks. The ASUS Vivobook 16X, with better color accuracy and wider color gamuts, offers enhanced screen quality suitable for engineering and design work where precise color representation is crucial. However, both laptops have screens with limited refresh rates, meaning they won't be as smooth for gaming and 3D applications, where higher refresh rates contribute to a more fluid visual experience.

Battery life estimate is based on a mix of common use patterns. More portable and higher performing laptops tend to have less battery life.

PerfectRec’s Build Quality Score incorporates case materials, display and keyboard flex, hinge quality, and overall reliability.

PerfectRec’s Content Creation Score takes into account the many different features of the laptop that make it more or less suitable for photo editing, video editing and other content creation tasks.

PerfectRec’s Software Development Score takes into account the many different features of the laptop that make it more or less suitable for software developers.