Acer Aspire 3 14 vs ASUS Vivobook 17

For general use, both the Acer Aspire 3 14 and ASUS Vivobook 17 offer screens that are likely to be adequate in resolution and brightness but may not have the most vibrant colors or sharpest panels, making them suitable for everyday tasks like browsing and document editing. When it comes to engineering and design, both laptops may fall short on delivering the full spectrum of colors professionals need due to limited color gamut coverage, impacting the accuracy of visual work. In gaming and 3D applications, the lower refresh rates of these screens can result in less fluid motion, while the resolution and panel quality may not meet the demands of high-fidelity visuals that gamers and 3D designers often seek.

Battery life estimate is based on a mix of common use patterns. More portable and higher performing laptops tend to have less battery life.

The Acer Aspire 3 14, with its AMD Ryzen 5 CPU, offers balanced performance for general tasks and benefits from a portable design and a battery life suitable for on-the-go use, but has less storage than the ASUS Vivobook 17, which might limit the amount of data and applications you can store directly on the device. The ASUS Vivobook 17 provides a larger screen, which might be more comfortable for extended viewing and multitasking, yet its bulkier size and heavier weight detract from its portability, and it offers a shorter battery life, which could be a drawback for users needing to work remotely for longer periods without access to power.

The Acer Aspire 3 14 and the ASUS Vivobook 17 are considered fair for gaming and 3D because both have graphics units that meet baseline requirements for casual gaming but may not handle intense graphics processing smoothly, and they both have standard screen refresh rates that are suitable for regular tasks but not ideal for high-end gaming that benefits from faster refresh rates. The Acer's AMD Radeon 610M and ASUS's integrated Intel graphics are moderate in terms of performance, while the CPUs and screen quality of both laptops support everyday use and offer decent visual experiences, but do not stand out for advanced gaming or professional 3D work.

The Acer Aspire 3 14 has a fair combination of CPU, GPU, and RAM adequate for general engineering and design tasks but might struggle with more demanding simulations or rendering due to its mid-range processor and entry-level graphics; its smaller screen size could constrain extensive design work, but it offers portability and quieter operation.

PerfectRec’s Content Creation Score takes into account the many different features of the laptop that make it more or less suitable for photo editing, video editing and other content creation tasks.

PerfectRec’s Software Development Score takes into account the many different features of the laptop that make it more or less suitable for software developers.

PerfectRec’s Build Quality Score incorporates case materials, display and keyboard flex, hinge quality, and overall reliability.